Complications after benign gynecologic surgery—How are they captured in register-based research? A national register study in Sweden

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Elin Collins, Per Liv, Annika Strandell, Maria Furberg, Sophia Ehrström, Mathias Pålsson, Annika Idahl
{"title":"Complications after benign gynecologic surgery—How are they captured in register-based research? A national register study in Sweden","authors":"Elin Collins,&nbsp;Per Liv,&nbsp;Annika Strandell,&nbsp;Maria Furberg,&nbsp;Sophia Ehrström,&nbsp;Mathias Pålsson,&nbsp;Annika Idahl","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The evidence on complication rates after gynecological surgery is based on multiple types of studies, and the level of evidence is generally low. We aimed to validate the registration of complications in the Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery (GynOp), by cross-linkage to multiple national registers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A national register-based study using prospectively collected data was conducted, including women who had surgery on the uterus or adnexa for benign indications from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020. In Sweden, complications after gynecological surgery are registered in GynOp, and if the complication has rendered any interaction with healthcare, it is also in national health registers. The GynOp register, the National Patient Register, the Prescribed Drugs Register, and the Cause of Death Register were cross-linked. Complications in GynOp and complications according to ICD10 were analyzed, as well as the cause of death if occurring within 3 months of surgery and prescription of antibiotics ≤30 days. Comparisons between the registries were descriptive.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During the study period 32 537 surgeries were performed, of which 26 214 (80.6%) were minimally invasive. Complications were reported in GynOp for 569 women (1.7%) at surgery, 1045 (3.2%) while admitted, and 3868 (13.7%) from discharge to 3 months after surgery. In comparison, according to the Patient Register, 2254 women (6.9%) had postoperative complications within 3 months of discharge (difference of 6.8 percentage points [95% confidence interval 6.2–7.2]). Furthermore, 4117 individuals (12.7%) had a prescription of antibiotics ≤30 days which could indicate a postoperative infection. The rates of hemorrhage, wound dehiscence, and thrombosis were comparable between GynOp and the Patient Register while diagnoses not leading to contact with specialized care had higher rates in the quality register. The coverage of complications was 79.1% in GynOp and 46.1% in the Patient Register, using the total number of complications from both registers as the denominator.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A higher frequency of complications is captured in GynOp than in the National Patient Register. Patient-reported outcomes assessed by a physician are beneficial in identifying complications indicating the importance of structured pre-defined follow-up over a set period.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"103 11","pages":"2221-2231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.14960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The evidence on complication rates after gynecological surgery is based on multiple types of studies, and the level of evidence is generally low. We aimed to validate the registration of complications in the Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery (GynOp), by cross-linkage to multiple national registers.

Material and Methods

A national register-based study using prospectively collected data was conducted, including women who had surgery on the uterus or adnexa for benign indications from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020. In Sweden, complications after gynecological surgery are registered in GynOp, and if the complication has rendered any interaction with healthcare, it is also in national health registers. The GynOp register, the National Patient Register, the Prescribed Drugs Register, and the Cause of Death Register were cross-linked. Complications in GynOp and complications according to ICD10 were analyzed, as well as the cause of death if occurring within 3 months of surgery and prescription of antibiotics ≤30 days. Comparisons between the registries were descriptive.

Results

During the study period 32 537 surgeries were performed, of which 26 214 (80.6%) were minimally invasive. Complications were reported in GynOp for 569 women (1.7%) at surgery, 1045 (3.2%) while admitted, and 3868 (13.7%) from discharge to 3 months after surgery. In comparison, according to the Patient Register, 2254 women (6.9%) had postoperative complications within 3 months of discharge (difference of 6.8 percentage points [95% confidence interval 6.2–7.2]). Furthermore, 4117 individuals (12.7%) had a prescription of antibiotics ≤30 days which could indicate a postoperative infection. The rates of hemorrhage, wound dehiscence, and thrombosis were comparable between GynOp and the Patient Register while diagnoses not leading to contact with specialized care had higher rates in the quality register. The coverage of complications was 79.1% in GynOp and 46.1% in the Patient Register, using the total number of complications from both registers as the denominator.

Conclusions

A higher frequency of complications is captured in GynOp than in the National Patient Register. Patient-reported outcomes assessed by a physician are beneficial in identifying complications indicating the importance of structured pre-defined follow-up over a set period.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

良性妇科手术后的并发症--基于登记的研究如何捕捉这些并发症?瑞典的一项全国登记研究。
简介:有关妇科手术后并发症发生率的证据基于多种类型的研究,证据水平普遍较低。我们旨在通过与多个国家登记册的交叉链接,验证瑞典国家妇科手术质量登记册(GynOp)中并发症的登记情况:我们利用前瞻性收集的数据开展了一项基于国家登记册的研究,研究对象包括2017年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间因良性适应症接受子宫或附件手术的女性。在瑞典,妇科手术后的并发症会在 GynOp 中登记,如果并发症与医疗保健有任何关联,也会在国家健康登记册中登记。妇科手术登记册、全国患者登记册、处方药登记册和死因登记册是相互关联的。分析了妇科手术中的并发症和符合 ICD10 标准的并发症,以及发生在手术后 3 个月内的死亡原因和处方抗生素时间不超过 30 天的死亡原因。各登记处之间的比较是描述性的:研究期间共进行了 32 537 例手术,其中 26 214 例(80.6%)为微创手术。妇产科登记的并发症报告包括:569 名妇女(1.7%)在手术时出现并发症,1045 名妇女(3.2%)在入院时出现并发症,3868 名妇女(13.7%)在出院后至术后 3 个月内出现并发症。相比之下,根据患者登记册,2254 名妇女(6.9%)在出院后 3 个月内出现了术后并发症(相差 6.8 个百分点[95% 置信区间 6.2-7.2])。此外,有 4117 人(12.7%)在术后 30 天内服用过抗生素,这可能意味着术后感染。出血、伤口裂开和血栓形成的发生率在妇产科和病人登记册中不相上下,而在质量登记册中,未导致接触专门护理的诊断发生率较高。以两个登记册的并发症总数为分母,并发症的覆盖率在妇产科登记册中为 79.1%,在病人登记册中为 46.1%:结论:妇科手术中出现并发症的频率高于全国患者登记册。由医生评估患者报告的结果有利于发现并发症,这表明在一定时期内进行结构化的预定义随访非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信