Adequacy Assessment in Lymph Node Aspirates: An Exploratory Cytomorphologic Analysis of Negative Cervical Node Aspirates of Head and Neck Carcinomas.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Acta Cytologica Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1159/000541050
Joshua Li, Joanna K M Ng, Julia Y Tsang, Gary M Tse
{"title":"Adequacy Assessment in Lymph Node Aspirates: An Exploratory Cytomorphologic Analysis of Negative Cervical Node Aspirates of Head and Neck Carcinomas.","authors":"Joshua Li, Joanna K M Ng, Julia Y Tsang, Gary M Tse","doi":"10.1159/000541050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of lymph node is sensitive for detection of metastatic carcinoma but not without a significant false-negative rate. This study reviews clinicocytological features of negative node aspirates to identify predictive factors for establishing adequacy criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Negative FNAC specimens matched with neck dissection from a primary diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell, or undifferentiated (nasopharyngeal) carcinoma were reviewed for clinical and cytological parameters including lymphoid, inflammatory, and background components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Slides from 86 lymph node aspirates including 50 positive for metastasis on follow-up were retrieved. Higher total lymphocyte count, lymphoid fragment count, germinal center fragment count, undifferentiated histology, presence of histiocytes and absence of blood were associated with a true negative cytologic diagnosis (p &lt; 0.05), but not node size or location (p &gt; 0.05). Undifferentiated histology, small lymphoid and germinal center fragments were independent factors indicative of a true negative diagnosis (p &lt; 0.05). Large lymphoid fragments (p = 0.052) demonstrated a trend. Assessment of lymphoid components over five hotspots high-power fields (HPFs) was more robust in predictive value than only one hotspot. Receiver operating characteristic curve identified &gt;10 small lymphoid, &gt;20 large lymphoid and &gt;2 germinal center fragment per five HPFs as optimal adequacy thresholds. Stricter total lymphocyte count cutoff accompanies increase of diagnostic accuracy, up to 0.67 for ≥5 HPFs with &gt;500 lymphocytes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Total counts of lymphoid and germinal center fragments from multiple HPFs are useful in adequacy assessment of lymph node aspirates and improve diagnostic performance of FNAC in exclusion of metastatic carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cytologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of lymph node is sensitive for detection of metastatic carcinoma but not without a significant false-negative rate. This study reviews clinicocytological features of negative node aspirates to identify predictive factors for establishing adequacy criteria.

Methods: Negative FNAC specimens matched with neck dissection from a primary diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell, or undifferentiated (nasopharyngeal) carcinoma were reviewed for clinical and cytological parameters including lymphoid, inflammatory, and background components.

Results: Slides from 86 lymph node aspirates including 50 positive for metastasis on follow-up were retrieved. Higher total lymphocyte count, lymphoid fragment count, germinal center fragment count, undifferentiated histology, presence of histiocytes and absence of blood were associated with a true negative cytologic diagnosis (p < 0.05), but not node size or location (p > 0.05). Undifferentiated histology, small lymphoid and germinal center fragments were independent factors indicative of a true negative diagnosis (p < 0.05). Large lymphoid fragments (p = 0.052) demonstrated a trend. Assessment of lymphoid components over five hotspots high-power fields (HPFs) was more robust in predictive value than only one hotspot. Receiver operating characteristic curve identified >10 small lymphoid, >20 large lymphoid and >2 germinal center fragment per five HPFs as optimal adequacy thresholds. Stricter total lymphocyte count cutoff accompanies increase of diagnostic accuracy, up to 0.67 for ≥5 HPFs with >500 lymphocytes.

Conclusion: Total counts of lymphoid and germinal center fragments from multiple HPFs are useful in adequacy assessment of lymph node aspirates and improve diagnostic performance of FNAC in exclusion of metastatic carcinoma.

淋巴结穿刺的充分性评估--对头颈部癌阴性宫颈结穿刺的细胞形态学探索性分析。
导言:淋巴结细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)对检测转移性癌很敏感,但也存在明显的假阴性率。本研究回顾了阴性淋巴结穿刺标本的临床细胞学特征,以确定建立充分性标准的预测因素。方法 对初诊为头颈部鳞状细胞癌或未分化癌(鼻咽癌)的与颈部切除术相匹配的阴性 FNAC 标本进行临床和细胞学参数审查,包括淋巴、炎症和背景成分。结果 检索了 86 例淋巴结穿刺的切片,包括 50 例随访转移阳性淋巴结穿刺。较高的淋巴细胞总数、淋巴片段计数、生殖中心片段计数、未分化组织学、组织细胞的存在和无血与真正的阴性细胞学诊断相关(p<0.05),但与淋巴结大小或位置无关(p>0.05)。未分化组织学、小淋巴细胞和生殖中心碎片是提示真阴性诊断的独立因素(p<0.05)。大淋巴细胞片段(p=0.052)显示了一种趋势。评估五个热点高功率场(HFP)的淋巴成分比只评估一个热点更有预测价值。接收者操作特征曲线确定每五个高功率场中有 10 个小淋巴细胞、20 个大淋巴细胞和 2 个生殖中心片段为最佳适度阈值。更严格的淋巴细胞总数临界值提高了诊断准确性,当≥5 个 HPF 中有 500 个淋巴细胞时,诊断准确性可达 0.67。结论 来自多个 HPF 的淋巴细胞和生殖中心碎片的总计数有助于评估淋巴结穿刺的充分性,并提高 FNAC 在排除转移性癌方面的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Cytologica
Acta Cytologica 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With articles offering an excellent balance between clinical cytology and cytopathology, ''Acta Cytologica'' fosters the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms behind cytomorphology and thus facilitates the translation of frontline research into clinical practice. As the official journal of the International Academy of Cytology and affiliated to over 50 national cytology societies around the world, ''Acta Cytologica'' evaluates new and existing diagnostic applications of scientific advances as well as their clinical correlations. Original papers, review articles, meta-analyses, novel insights from clinical practice, and letters to the editor cover topics from diagnostic cytopathology, gynecologic and non-gynecologic cytopathology to fine needle aspiration, molecular techniques and their diagnostic applications. As the perfect reference for practical use, ''Acta Cytologica'' addresses a multidisciplinary audience practicing clinical cytopathology, cell biology, oncology, interventional radiology, otorhinolaryngology, gastroenterology, urology, pulmonology and preventive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信