Divergent responses of aggregate breakdown by slaking to nitrogen forms in solution for contrasting soil types

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
{"title":"Divergent responses of aggregate breakdown by slaking to nitrogen forms in solution for contrasting soil types","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Aggregate stability strongly affects many soil processes and is critical to maintain sustainable agriculture. Aggregate breakdown is controlled by the interaction between soil intrinsic properties and solution characteristics. Nitrogen fertilization including different forms is well known to influence aggregate stability; however, relative to their long-term effects, there is little recognition on the rapid response of aggregate breakdown to nitrogen solutions. This study aimed to examine the effects of nitrogen form and concentration on aggregate stability for different types of soils. Aggregate breakdown against slaking of three soil types (Phaeozem, Luvisol, and Acrisol) and three horizons (organo-mineral (A), illuvium (B), and parent material horizons (C)) was determined subjected to nitrogen solutions of three forms (CO(NH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>) and five concentrations (0.05 ∼ 1.0 mol/L). Among nitrogen forms, urea solution almost had non-significant effect irrespective of soil type and horizon (p &gt; 0.05); for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> solutions, aggregate stability showed little variations (MWD of 0.19 ∼ 0.26 mm) with electrolyte concentration for Phaeozem in B and C horizons, overall increased for Luvisol and Phaeozem in A horizon, and decreased first and then reached a steady state for Acrisol. The effects of nitrogen forms on aggregate breakdown were dependent on soil aggregation status or cementing agents (mainly organic matter, clay mineralogy). Electrolyte nitrogen solutions (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>) inhibited aggregate breakdown mainly through reducing electrostatic repulsive forces for moderately developed soils rich in swelling clays, and promoted aggregate breakdown by both weakening particle cohesion and enhancing compression pressure of entrapped air for highly developed soils rich in non-swelling clays and Fe/Al oxides. These results facilitate an improvement of fertilizer management and irrigation to improve soil quality on different soil types.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124002453/pdfft?md5=b71ca582a70a806aa510abc6a1f2c893&pid=1-s2.0-S0016706124002453-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124002453","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aggregate stability strongly affects many soil processes and is critical to maintain sustainable agriculture. Aggregate breakdown is controlled by the interaction between soil intrinsic properties and solution characteristics. Nitrogen fertilization including different forms is well known to influence aggregate stability; however, relative to their long-term effects, there is little recognition on the rapid response of aggregate breakdown to nitrogen solutions. This study aimed to examine the effects of nitrogen form and concentration on aggregate stability for different types of soils. Aggregate breakdown against slaking of three soil types (Phaeozem, Luvisol, and Acrisol) and three horizons (organo-mineral (A), illuvium (B), and parent material horizons (C)) was determined subjected to nitrogen solutions of three forms (CO(NH2)2, NH4+, NO3) and five concentrations (0.05 ∼ 1.0 mol/L). Among nitrogen forms, urea solution almost had non-significant effect irrespective of soil type and horizon (p > 0.05); for NH4+ and NO3 solutions, aggregate stability showed little variations (MWD of 0.19 ∼ 0.26 mm) with electrolyte concentration for Phaeozem in B and C horizons, overall increased for Luvisol and Phaeozem in A horizon, and decreased first and then reached a steady state for Acrisol. The effects of nitrogen forms on aggregate breakdown were dependent on soil aggregation status or cementing agents (mainly organic matter, clay mineralogy). Electrolyte nitrogen solutions (NH4+ and NO3) inhibited aggregate breakdown mainly through reducing electrostatic repulsive forces for moderately developed soils rich in swelling clays, and promoted aggregate breakdown by both weakening particle cohesion and enhancing compression pressure of entrapped air for highly developed soils rich in non-swelling clays and Fe/Al oxides. These results facilitate an improvement of fertilizer management and irrigation to improve soil quality on different soil types.

在不同土壤类型中,碾碎法分解骨料对溶液中氮形态的不同反应
团聚体的稳定性对许多土壤过程都有很大影响,对维持可持续农业至关重要。团聚体的分解受土壤固有特性和溶液特性之间相互作用的控制。众所周知,氮肥(包括不同形式的氮肥)会影响团聚体的稳定性;然而,相对于氮肥的长期影响,人们很少认识到团聚体分解对氮溶液的快速反应。本研究旨在考察氮的形式和浓度对不同类型土壤集料稳定性的影响。在三种形式(CO(NH2)2、NH4+、NO3-)和五种浓度(0.05 ∼ 1.0 mol/L)的氮溶液作用下,测定了三种土壤类型(辉绿岩、Luvisol 和 Acrisol)和三种地层(有机矿质地层(A)、冲积层(B)和母质地层(C))的骨料在碾压过程中的破坏情况。在氮形态中,尿素溶液对不同土壤类型和地层的影响几乎不显著(p > 0.05);NH4+和NO3-溶液对B和C地层的辉绿岩的骨料稳定性随电解质浓度的变化很小(MWD为0.19 ∼ 0.26 mm),对Luvisol和A地层的辉绿岩的骨料稳定性总体呈上升趋势,对Acrisol的骨料稳定性先下降后达到稳定状态。氮形态对聚合体分解的影响取决于土壤的聚合状态或胶结剂(主要是有机质、粘土矿物性)。电解质氮溶液(NH4+ 和 NO3-)主要通过减少静电斥力来抑制富含膨胀性粘土的中等发育土壤的团聚体破碎,而对于富含非膨胀性粘土和铁/铝氧化物的高度发育土壤,则通过削弱颗粒内聚力和提高夹带空气的压缩压力来促进团聚体破碎。这些结果有助于改进肥料管理和灌溉,以改善不同土壤类型的土壤质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信