The effect of human capital on the trade-growth nexus: A dynamic panel threshold analysis

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS

Research in Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rie.2024.100988

Mariem Gharsallah, Salwa Trabelsi

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes the nonlinear effect of trade openness on economic growth over a sample of developed and developing countries during the period 1980–2020. Using a Dynamic Panel Threshold Model advanced by Seo and Shin (2016), and Seo et al., (2019), the results prove the existence of a human capital's threshold level above it openness to trade has a positive effect on economic growth. More precisely, trade can enhance economic performance if the human capital is high, otherwise, the effect is negative.

查看原文本刊更多论文

人力资本对贸易-增长关系的影响：动态面板阈值分析

本文以发达国家和发展中国家为样本，分析了 1980-2020 年间贸易开放对经济增长的非线性影响。利用 Seo 和 Shin（2016 年）以及 Seo 等人（2019 年）提出的动态面板阈值模型，结果证明存在一个人力资本阈值水平，在该水平之上，贸易开放对经济增长有积极影响。更确切地说，如果人力资本较高，贸易可以提高经济表现，反之，则效果为负。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Research in Economics ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

89 days

期刊介绍： Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.