Lessons learned: drive-through COVID-19 clinic testing during an adaptive epidemic response and a point-of-care test assessment of a computer-read rapid lateral flow immunoassay with fluorescence-based detection.

Leah Rankine-Wilson, Teresa Oncken, Irshan Basrewan, Courtney Jeffery, Todd M Pryce, Rebecca Wake, Aus A L Molan, T F Paton, Tim J J Inglis
{"title":"Lessons learned: drive-through COVID-19 clinic testing during an adaptive epidemic response and a point-of-care test assessment of a computer-read rapid lateral flow immunoassay with fluorescence-based detection.","authors":"Leah Rankine-Wilson, Teresa Oncken, Irshan Basrewan, Courtney Jeffery, Todd M Pryce, Rebecca Wake, Aus A L Molan, T F Paton, Tim J J Inglis","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated a need for robust SARS-CoV-2 test evaluation infrastructure to underpin biosecurity and protect the population during a pandemic health emergency.<b>Gap statement.</b> The first generation of rapid antigen tests was less accurate than molecular methods due to their inherent sensitivity and specificity shortfalls, compounded by the consequences of self-testing. This created a need for more accurate point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 detection methods.<b>Aim.</b> Here we present the lessons-learned during the COVID-19 emergency response in Western Australia including the detailed set-up, evaluation and operation of rapid antigen test in a state-run drive-through sample collection service during the COVID-19 pandemic after the strict border shutdown ended.<b>Methods.</b> We report a conformity assessment of a novel, second-generation rapid antigen test (Virulizer) comprising a technician-operated rapid lateral flow immunoassay with fluorescence-based detection.<b>Results.</b> The Virulizer rapid antigen test demonstrated up to 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 61.0-100%), 91.94% specificity (95% CI: 82.5-96.5%) and 92.65% accuracy when compared to a commercial PCR assay method. Wide confidence intervals in our series reflect the limits of small sample size. Nevertheless, the Virulizer assay performance was well-suited to point-of-care screening for SARS-CoV-2 in a drive-through clinic setting.<b>Conclusion.</b> The adaptive evaluation process necessary under changing pandemic conditions enabled assessment of a simple sample collection and point-of-care testing process, and showed how this system could be rapidly deployed for SARS-CoV-2 testing, including to regional and remote settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"73 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated a need for robust SARS-CoV-2 test evaluation infrastructure to underpin biosecurity and protect the population during a pandemic health emergency.Gap statement. The first generation of rapid antigen tests was less accurate than molecular methods due to their inherent sensitivity and specificity shortfalls, compounded by the consequences of self-testing. This created a need for more accurate point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 detection methods.Aim. Here we present the lessons-learned during the COVID-19 emergency response in Western Australia including the detailed set-up, evaluation and operation of rapid antigen test in a state-run drive-through sample collection service during the COVID-19 pandemic after the strict border shutdown ended.Methods. We report a conformity assessment of a novel, second-generation rapid antigen test (Virulizer) comprising a technician-operated rapid lateral flow immunoassay with fluorescence-based detection.Results. The Virulizer rapid antigen test demonstrated up to 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 61.0-100%), 91.94% specificity (95% CI: 82.5-96.5%) and 92.65% accuracy when compared to a commercial PCR assay method. Wide confidence intervals in our series reflect the limits of small sample size. Nevertheless, the Virulizer assay performance was well-suited to point-of-care screening for SARS-CoV-2 in a drive-through clinic setting.Conclusion. The adaptive evaluation process necessary under changing pandemic conditions enabled assessment of a simple sample collection and point-of-care testing process, and showed how this system could be rapidly deployed for SARS-CoV-2 testing, including to regional and remote settings.

经验总结:在适应性流行病反应期间进行的驾车通过式 COVID-19 诊所检测,以及对基于荧光检测的计算机读取快速侧流免疫测定进行的护理点检测评估。
背景。COVID-19 大流行表明,有必要建立健全的 SARS-CoV-2 检测评估基础设施,以确保生物安全,并在大流行性紧急卫生事件中保护民众。第一代快速抗原检测法由于其固有的灵敏度和特异性不足,准确性低于分子检测法,再加上自我检测的后果,使其更加复杂。因此需要更准确的 SARS-CoV-2 床旁检测方法。在此,我们介绍了西澳大利亚州在 COVID-19 大流行期间紧急应对 COVID-19 的经验教训,包括在严格的边境关闭结束后的 COVID-19 大流行期间,由州政府管理的驾车通过样本采集服务中快速抗原检测的详细设置、评估和运行情况。我们报告了对新型第二代快速抗原检测方法(Virulizer)的符合性评估,该方法由技术人员操作的快速侧流免疫分析法和荧光检测法组成。与商业 PCR 检测方法相比,Virulizer 快速抗原检测法的灵敏度高达 100%(95% CI:61.0-100%),特异性高达 91.94%(95% CI:82.5-96.5%),准确性高达 92.65%。我们系列研究中的置信区间较宽,反映了样本量较小的局限性。尽管如此,Virulizer 检测法的性能非常适合在驱车门诊环境中进行 SARS-CoV-2 的床旁筛查。在不断变化的大流行条件下所需的适应性评估过程使我们能够对简单的样本采集和床旁检测过程进行评估,并展示了如何将该系统快速部署到 SARS-CoV-2 检测中,包括部署到地区和偏远地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信