Comparison of different spectral ranges of UV-LED lighting for outdoor mosquito trapping in forested area in Thailand.

Suthat Lhaosudto, Ratchadawan Ngoen-Klan, Vithee Meunworn, Monthathip Kongmee, Jeffrey Hii, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap
{"title":"Comparison of different spectral ranges of UV-LED lighting for outdoor mosquito trapping in forested area in Thailand.","authors":"Suthat Lhaosudto, Ratchadawan Ngoen-Klan, Vithee Meunworn, Monthathip Kongmee, Jeffrey Hii, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap","doi":"10.1093/jme/tjae112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mosquito surveillance is critical for actively tracking the location and monitoring population levels and the threat of mosquito-borne disease. Although light-emitting diodes (LEDs) light traps have grown in popularity, there is still a limited understanding of the application of light wavelengths for trapping nocturnally active wild mosquitoes in forest ecotypes. This study evaluated the performance of different UV wavelengths in trapping mosquito populations in a forested mountainous area in Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand. Traps with different UV wavelengths were deployed in 6 locations, following a 6 × 6 Latin square replicated 6 times over a total of 36 nights. Light traps were operated between 18:00 and 06:00 h from October 2022 to August 2023. Mosquitoes were separately collected from individual traps every 4 h at 22.00, 2.00, and 6.00 h. Mosquitoes were killed by placing in a freezer (- 20 °C) for at least 30 min and then were morphologically identified using illustrated keys for adult females. Traps fitted with the LED 365 wavelength light source were the most effective in capturing 790 (23.66%) of the total mosquitoes collected, followed by the UV fluorescent 632 (18.93%), with the other 4 LED wavelengths collecting between 16.89% (LED 385) and 12.64% (LED 375) of the mosquitoes. Culex was the most common genus, representing 56.00% of total mosquito abundance. LED 365 and LED 385 were comparable to the UV fluorescent traps (the standard reference). Optimal trapping times were during 18:00-22:00 h. Compared to the other wavelengths, LED 365 was significantly more effective at capturing Coquillettidia and Culex mosquitoes than the UV-based traps.</p>","PeriodicalId":94091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical entomology","volume":" ","pages":"1510-1518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjae112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mosquito surveillance is critical for actively tracking the location and monitoring population levels and the threat of mosquito-borne disease. Although light-emitting diodes (LEDs) light traps have grown in popularity, there is still a limited understanding of the application of light wavelengths for trapping nocturnally active wild mosquitoes in forest ecotypes. This study evaluated the performance of different UV wavelengths in trapping mosquito populations in a forested mountainous area in Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand. Traps with different UV wavelengths were deployed in 6 locations, following a 6 × 6 Latin square replicated 6 times over a total of 36 nights. Light traps were operated between 18:00 and 06:00 h from October 2022 to August 2023. Mosquitoes were separately collected from individual traps every 4 h at 22.00, 2.00, and 6.00 h. Mosquitoes were killed by placing in a freezer (- 20 °C) for at least 30 min and then were morphologically identified using illustrated keys for adult females. Traps fitted with the LED 365 wavelength light source were the most effective in capturing 790 (23.66%) of the total mosquitoes collected, followed by the UV fluorescent 632 (18.93%), with the other 4 LED wavelengths collecting between 16.89% (LED 385) and 12.64% (LED 375) of the mosquitoes. Culex was the most common genus, representing 56.00% of total mosquito abundance. LED 365 and LED 385 were comparable to the UV fluorescent traps (the standard reference). Optimal trapping times were during 18:00-22:00 h. Compared to the other wavelengths, LED 365 was significantly more effective at capturing Coquillettidia and Culex mosquitoes than the UV-based traps.

比较不同光谱范围的紫外线-LED 照明在泰国森林地区户外诱捕蚊子的效果。
蚊子监测对于积极追踪蚊子的位置、监测蚊子的数量以及蚊子传播疾病的威胁至关重要。虽然发光二极管(LED)光诱捕器越来越受欢迎,但人们对光波长在森林生态类型中诱捕夜间活动的野生蚊子的应用了解仍然有限。本研究评估了不同紫外线波长在泰国呵叻府森林山区诱捕蚊子种群的性能。在 6 个地点部署了不同紫外线波长的诱捕器,按照 6 × 6 的拉丁方形重复 6 次,共 36 个夜晚。从 2022 年 10 月到 2023 年 8 月,光诱捕器在 18:00 到 06:00 之间工作。将蚊子放入冷冻箱(-20 °C)中至少30分钟后杀死,然后使用图解雌性蚊子形态鉴定法进行鉴定。装有 LED 365 波长光源的诱捕器最有效,捕获了 790(23.66%)只蚊子,其次是紫外线荧光诱捕器 632(18.93%),其他 4 种 LED 波长诱捕器捕获了 16.89%(LED 385)到 12.64%(LED 375)只蚊子。库蚊是最常见的蚊属,占蚊子总数的 56.00%。LED 365 和 LED 385 与紫外线荧光诱捕器(标准参考)的效果相当。最佳诱捕时间为 18:00-22:00 h。与其他波长的诱捕器相比,LED 365 在捕获库蚊和库蚊方面的效果明显优于紫外线诱捕器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信