Application of Chairside CAD/CAM and Its Influencing Factors among Chinese Dental Practitioners: a Crosssectional Study.

Aihemaiti Muhetaer, Hong Ye Yang, Cui Huang
{"title":"Application of Chairside CAD/CAM and Its Influencing Factors among Chinese Dental Practitioners: a Crosssectional Study.","authors":"Aihemaiti Muhetaer, Hong Ye Yang, Cui Huang","doi":"10.3290/j.cjdr.b5698327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the increased use of chairside CAD/CAM among Chinese dental practitioners, and to explore the existing barriers influencing its further application and satisfaction levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A semi-structured questionnaire was developed to gather respondents' demographic information, as well as their experiences and behaviours regarding the implementation of chairside CAD/CAM. A specialised web-based survey system and WeChat were used to display and distribute the final questionnaire. Then, the data were analysed with Chi-square tests and regression analyses to determine the effects of various demographic variables on chairside CAD/ CAM applications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,969 questionnaire responses were included in the analyses. Chairside CAD/ CAM systems were used by 36.9% of participants, with a higher usage rate observed among prosthodontists (60.0%) and dental practitioners holding a PhD degree (57.7%). Chairside CAD/ CAM-fabricated prostheses were most commonly used in the posterior maxilla (83.3%) and mandible (86.0%), followed by the anterior maxilla and mandible (63.8% and 48.6%, respectively). Major barriers to further application included high initial investment, frequent updates of equipment and software programs, and a lack of expertise in chairside CAD/CAM usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most dental practitioners did not use chairside CAD/CAM systems. The application rate was significantly influenced by sex, location, educational background, department and type of healthcare facility. Chairside CAD/CAM users showed limited satisfaction with the aesthetic performance of the fabricated prostheses. To improve the popularity of chairside CAD/CAM systems, especially among dental practitioners lacking advanced academic degrees, it is highly advisable to optimise CAD software programs and offer comprehensive training opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":74983,"journal":{"name":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)","volume":"27 3","pages":"253-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b5698327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the increased use of chairside CAD/CAM among Chinese dental practitioners, and to explore the existing barriers influencing its further application and satisfaction levels.

Methods: A semi-structured questionnaire was developed to gather respondents' demographic information, as well as their experiences and behaviours regarding the implementation of chairside CAD/CAM. A specialised web-based survey system and WeChat were used to display and distribute the final questionnaire. Then, the data were analysed with Chi-square tests and regression analyses to determine the effects of various demographic variables on chairside CAD/ CAM applications.

Results: A total of 1,969 questionnaire responses were included in the analyses. Chairside CAD/ CAM systems were used by 36.9% of participants, with a higher usage rate observed among prosthodontists (60.0%) and dental practitioners holding a PhD degree (57.7%). Chairside CAD/ CAM-fabricated prostheses were most commonly used in the posterior maxilla (83.3%) and mandible (86.0%), followed by the anterior maxilla and mandible (63.8% and 48.6%, respectively). Major barriers to further application included high initial investment, frequent updates of equipment and software programs, and a lack of expertise in chairside CAD/CAM usage.

Conclusion: Most dental practitioners did not use chairside CAD/CAM systems. The application rate was significantly influenced by sex, location, educational background, department and type of healthcare facility. Chairside CAD/CAM users showed limited satisfaction with the aesthetic performance of the fabricated prostheses. To improve the popularity of chairside CAD/CAM systems, especially among dental practitioners lacking advanced academic degrees, it is highly advisable to optimise CAD software programs and offer comprehensive training opportunities.

中国牙科医生椅旁 CAD/CAM 的应用及其影响因素:一项横断面研究。
目的研究中国牙科医生对椅旁CAD/CAM应用的增加情况,并探讨影响其进一步应用和满意度的现有障碍:方法: 编制了一份半结构式问卷,以收集受访者的人口统计学信息以及他们在实施椅旁 CAD/CAM 方面的经验和行为。最终问卷通过专门的网络调查系统和微信进行展示和分发。然后,利用卡方检验和回归分析对数据进行分析,以确定各种人口统计学变量对椅旁 CAD/CAM 应用的影响:结果:共有 1,969 份问卷被纳入分析。36.9%的参与者使用了椅旁CAD/ CAM系统,其中口腔修复医师(60.0%)和拥有博士学位的牙科医生(57.7%)的使用率较高。椅旁 CAD/ CAM 制作的义齿最常用于上颌骨后部(83.3%)和下颌骨(86.0%),其次是上颌骨前部和下颌骨(分别为 63.8% 和 48.6%)。进一步应用的主要障碍包括初始投资高、设备和软件程序更新频繁以及缺乏使用椅旁 CAD/CAM 的专业知识:结论:大多数牙科医生没有使用椅旁 CAD/CAM 系统。应用率受性别、地点、教育背景、科室和医疗机构类型的影响很大。椅旁 CAD/CAM 用户对制作的修复体的美学性能的满意度有限。为了提高椅旁 CAD/CAM 系统的普及率,尤其是在缺乏高等学历的牙科医生中的普及率,优化 CAD 软件程序并提供全面的培训机会是非常可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信