Follow-up of patients with chronic conditions within primary care practices during COVID-19: Results from 7 Central and Eastern-European countries from the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2024.2391468
Giulia Delvento, Christian Schindler, Cristina Rotaru, Ala Curteanu, Ghenadie Curochicin, Helen Prytherch, Victoria Tkachenko, Bohumil Seifert, Peter Torzsa, Radost Asenova, Carmen Busneag, Adam Windak, Sara Willems, Esther Van Poel, Claire Collins
{"title":"Follow-up of patients with chronic conditions within primary care practices during COVID-19: Results from 7 Central and Eastern-European countries from the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study.","authors":"Giulia Delvento, Christian Schindler, Cristina Rotaru, Ala Curteanu, Ghenadie Curochicin, Helen Prytherch, Victoria Tkachenko, Bohumil Seifert, Peter Torzsa, Radost Asenova, Carmen Busneag, Adam Windak, Sara Willems, Esther Van Poel, Claire Collins","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2024.2391468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic posed severe challenges to delivery of services at Primary Care level and for achieving follow-up of patients with chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We analysed data from the PRICOV-19 study to explore determinants of active follow-up for chronic disease patients in seven Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pricov-19 was a cross-sectional study conducted within PC (Primary Care) practices in 37 European countries. We analysed data from 7 CEE countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Moldova, Romania, Ukraine) collected between November 2020 and December 2021. Practices were recruited through random or convenience sampling and participation of practices was voluntary. We performed descriptive statistics to identify the level of follow-up of chronic disease and what health system and practice-specific factors were associated with better follow-up. We used logistic regression and meta-analysis techniques to explore associations and heterogeneity between countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>67.8% out of 978 practices reported actively following up chronic patients. Positive associations were found between active follow-up and such as having more GPs (aOR = 1.18, p-value = 0.005), an above-average chronic patient population (aOR = 3.13, p-value = 0.006), adequate government support (aOR = 2.35, p-value = 0.001), and GPs having time for guideline reading (aOR = 0.008, p-value = 1.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient follow-up, was influenced by different health system and practice-specific factors. The implications suggest the need for government support to enhance PC practice organisation during crises and solutions to decrease GP workload and provide tailored care for patients with chronic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"30 1","pages":"2391468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2024.2391468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic posed severe challenges to delivery of services at Primary Care level and for achieving follow-up of patients with chronic diseases.

Objectives: We analysed data from the PRICOV-19 study to explore determinants of active follow-up for chronic disease patients in seven Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries during the pandemic.

Methods: Pricov-19 was a cross-sectional study conducted within PC (Primary Care) practices in 37 European countries. We analysed data from 7 CEE countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Moldova, Romania, Ukraine) collected between November 2020 and December 2021. Practices were recruited through random or convenience sampling and participation of practices was voluntary. We performed descriptive statistics to identify the level of follow-up of chronic disease and what health system and practice-specific factors were associated with better follow-up. We used logistic regression and meta-analysis techniques to explore associations and heterogeneity between countries.

Results: 67.8% out of 978 practices reported actively following up chronic patients. Positive associations were found between active follow-up and such as having more GPs (aOR = 1.18, p-value = 0.005), an above-average chronic patient population (aOR = 3.13, p-value = 0.006), adequate government support (aOR = 2.35, p-value = 0.001), and GPs having time for guideline reading (aOR = 0.008, p-value = 1.71).

Conclusions: Patient follow-up, was influenced by different health system and practice-specific factors. The implications suggest the need for government support to enhance PC practice organisation during crises and solutions to decrease GP workload and provide tailored care for patients with chronic disease.

在 COVID-19 期间对初级保健实践中的慢性病患者进行随访:PRICOV-19 横向研究中 7 个中欧和东欧国家的结果。
背景COVID-19 大流行给基层医疗机构提供服务和实现对慢性病患者的随访带来了严峻挑战:我们分析了 PRICOV-19 研究的数据,以探讨大流行期间七个中东欧(CEE)国家慢性病患者积极随访的决定因素:Pricov-19 是一项横断面研究,在 37 个欧洲国家的 PC(初级保健)实践中进行。我们分析了 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 12 月期间收集的 7 个中东欧国家(保加利亚、捷克共和国、匈牙利、波兰、摩尔多瓦、罗马尼亚和乌克兰)的数据。我们通过随机或方便抽样的方式招募医疗机构,医疗机构的参与是自愿的。我们进行了描述性统计,以确定慢性病的随访水平,以及哪些卫生系统和医疗机构的特定因素与更好的随访相关。我们使用逻辑回归和荟萃分析技术来探讨各国之间的关联性和异质性:结果:在 978 家医疗机构中,有 67.8%的医疗机构报告对慢性病患者进行了积极随访。结果:在 978 家诊所中,67.8% 的诊所报告对慢性病患者进行了积极随访。积极随访与以下因素呈正相关:全科医生人数较多(aOR = 1.18,p 值 = 0.005)、慢性病患者人数高于平均水平(aOR = 3.13,p 值 = 0.006)、政府支持充足(aOR = 2.35,p 值 = 0.001)、全科医生有时间阅读指南(aOR = 0.008,p 值 = 1.71):患者随访受不同医疗系统和具体实践因素的影响。研究结果表明,政府有必要提供支持,在危机期间加强个人护理实践的组织工作,并提供解决方案,减轻全科医生的工作量,为慢性病患者提供量身定制的护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信