Educational needs assessment for health advocate role in family medicine residency training in Turkey: A Delphi study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2024.2386284
Meral Demirören, Duygu Ayhan Başer
{"title":"Educational needs assessment for health advocate role in family medicine residency training in Turkey: A Delphi study.","authors":"Meral Demirören, Duygu Ayhan Başer","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2024.2386284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health advocacy (HA) involves purposeful actions to inform, mobilise, and organise activities to address social determinants of health affecting individuals or communities. It is a fundamental component of medical practice, deemed mandatory by professional and educational bodies. Therefore, including health advocacy training in pre- and post-graduate medical education is crucial.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we aimed to determine the need for HA training for family physicians (FPs) based on expert opinions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a modified Delphi study with 105 academic experts and active FPs to explore HA training needs. Using a three-round technique, experts first answered five open-ended questions on HA competencies, teaching and assessment methods, learning environments, and integration in residency training. In the second round, statements from the responses were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, in the third round, statements below the 85% consensus level were revised and re-evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel consisted of 41 experts (33 academicians, 8 practitioners) who accepted the invitation and completed the study. At the end of the three rounds, consensus was reached on 38 statements for HA competencies, 15 for teaching methods, 8 for assessment methods, and 20 for integration for HA training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Competencies for the HA role are very broad in perspective and show commonalities with the FPs' 'professional', 'expert' and 'leader' roles. Longitudinally integration of the HA training into the national 'Family Medicine Residency Training Core Curriculum' through participatory processes and training of FM trainers in HA is strongly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2024.2386284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health advocacy (HA) involves purposeful actions to inform, mobilise, and organise activities to address social determinants of health affecting individuals or communities. It is a fundamental component of medical practice, deemed mandatory by professional and educational bodies. Therefore, including health advocacy training in pre- and post-graduate medical education is crucial.

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to determine the need for HA training for family physicians (FPs) based on expert opinions.

Methods: We conducted a modified Delphi study with 105 academic experts and active FPs to explore HA training needs. Using a three-round technique, experts first answered five open-ended questions on HA competencies, teaching and assessment methods, learning environments, and integration in residency training. In the second round, statements from the responses were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, in the third round, statements below the 85% consensus level were revised and re-evaluated.

Results: The panel consisted of 41 experts (33 academicians, 8 practitioners) who accepted the invitation and completed the study. At the end of the three rounds, consensus was reached on 38 statements for HA competencies, 15 for teaching methods, 8 for assessment methods, and 20 for integration for HA training.

Conclusion: Competencies for the HA role are very broad in perspective and show commonalities with the FPs' 'professional', 'expert' and 'leader' roles. Longitudinally integration of the HA training into the national 'Family Medicine Residency Training Core Curriculum' through participatory processes and training of FM trainers in HA is strongly recommended.

土耳其家庭医学住院医师培训中健康倡导者角色的教育需求评估:德尔菲研究。
背景:健康倡导(HA)涉及有目的的行动,即提供信息、动员和组织活动,以解决影响个人或社区健康的社会决定因素。它是医疗实践的基本组成部分,被专业和教育机构视为必修课程。因此,将健康倡导培训纳入医学预科和研究生教育至关重要:在本研究中,我们旨在根据专家意见确定家庭医生(FPs)对健康倡导培训的需求:方法:我们对 105 名学术专家和在职全科医生进行了改良德尔菲研究,以探讨医护培训需求。采用三轮技术,专家们首先回答了有关医管局能力、教学和评估方法、学习环境和住院医师培训整合的五个开放式问题。在第二轮中,专家们用 5 分李克特量表对回答中的陈述进行评分;在第三轮中,专家们对低于 85% 协商一致水平的陈述进行修改和重新评估:专家小组由 41 名专家(33 名院士,8 名从业人员)组成,他们接受了邀请并完成了研究。在三轮研究结束时,就 38 项关于医管局能力的陈述、15 项关于教学方法的陈述、8 项关于评估方法的陈述以及 20 项关于医管局培训整合的陈述达成了共识:结论:医护人员角色的能力具有非常广泛的视角,并与家庭医生的 "专业"、"专家 "和 "领导者 "角色具有共性。强烈建议通过参与式进程和对全科医生培训师进行医管局培训,将医管局培训纳入国家 "全科住院医师培训核心课程"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信