A Comparison of the First 60 Enucleation Cases Using a Thulium Fiber Laser without a Mentor to a Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) and Open Prostatectomy, and the Learning Curve.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Ender Cem Bulut, Burak Elmas, Murat Yavuz Koparal, Çağrı Coşkun, Uğur Aydın, Kadir Şerefhan Erten, Serhat Çetin, Sabuhi Alishov, Ali Atan, Süleyman Yeşil, Bora Küpeli
{"title":"A Comparison of the First 60 Enucleation Cases Using a Thulium Fiber Laser without a Mentor to a Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) and Open Prostatectomy, and the Learning Curve.","authors":"Ender Cem Bulut, Burak Elmas, Murat Yavuz Koparal, Çağrı Coşkun, Uğur Aydın, Kadir Şerefhan Erten, Serhat Çetin, Sabuhi Alishov, Ali Atan, Süleyman Yeşil, Bora Küpeli","doi":"10.3390/medicina60081356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: In the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), laser enucleation of the prostate is recommended as an alternative to transurethral resection (TURP) and open prostatectomy (OP). The thulium fiber laser, with its superficial penetration depth, can offer a rapid learning process by causing less heat injury and capsule damage. This study compares the first 60 cases of an endourologist performing thulium fiber enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) without a mentor to the results of OP and TURP performed by experienced surgeons. It also identifies the case number at which the operation time for ThuFLEP starts to plateau. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Between 1 November 2021 and 1 November 2023, the initial 60 ThuFLEP cases of an endourologist with no prior enucleation experience were compared with TURP and OP operations performed by experienced surgeons. Since the first 60 ThuFLEP cases involved 80-120 cc prostates, TURP and OP operations within this size range performed during the same period were included in the study. The groups were assessed for age, preoperative and postoperative prostate volume, PSA levels, the IPSS, the IPSS Quality of Life (QoL), and maximum urinary flow (Q<sub>max</sub>). The 60 consecutive ThuFLEP cases were divided into three groups of 20 (Groups 1, 2, and 3) and compared for operation time, IPSS, and Q<sub>max</sub>. <i>Results</i>: The operation time for TURP was shorter than for ThuFLEP and OP (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference between ThuFLEP and OP in postoperative Q<sub>max</sub> and IPSS, while TURP had lower values than the other two methods. For ThuFLEP, the operation time was longer in the first 20 cases but plateaued in groups 2 and 3 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Postoperative Q<sub>max</sub> and IPSS values showed no significant differences among the three ThuFLEP groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <i>Conclusions</i>: For large prostates, ThuFLEP provides better postoperative results than TURP and offers shorter catheterization and hospital stay times than OP. Its short learning curve makes it a preferable method for treating BPH compared to other laser techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11356040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60081356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), laser enucleation of the prostate is recommended as an alternative to transurethral resection (TURP) and open prostatectomy (OP). The thulium fiber laser, with its superficial penetration depth, can offer a rapid learning process by causing less heat injury and capsule damage. This study compares the first 60 cases of an endourologist performing thulium fiber enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) without a mentor to the results of OP and TURP performed by experienced surgeons. It also identifies the case number at which the operation time for ThuFLEP starts to plateau. Materials and Methods: Between 1 November 2021 and 1 November 2023, the initial 60 ThuFLEP cases of an endourologist with no prior enucleation experience were compared with TURP and OP operations performed by experienced surgeons. Since the first 60 ThuFLEP cases involved 80-120 cc prostates, TURP and OP operations within this size range performed during the same period were included in the study. The groups were assessed for age, preoperative and postoperative prostate volume, PSA levels, the IPSS, the IPSS Quality of Life (QoL), and maximum urinary flow (Qmax). The 60 consecutive ThuFLEP cases were divided into three groups of 20 (Groups 1, 2, and 3) and compared for operation time, IPSS, and Qmax. Results: The operation time for TURP was shorter than for ThuFLEP and OP (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between ThuFLEP and OP in postoperative Qmax and IPSS, while TURP had lower values than the other two methods. For ThuFLEP, the operation time was longer in the first 20 cases but plateaued in groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.001). Postoperative Qmax and IPSS values showed no significant differences among the three ThuFLEP groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: For large prostates, ThuFLEP provides better postoperative results than TURP and offers shorter catheterization and hospital stay times than OP. Its short learning curve makes it a preferable method for treating BPH compared to other laser techniques.

使用铥光纤激光器(无指导者)与经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)和开放式前列腺切除术进行的前 60 例去核手术与学习曲线的比较。
背景与目的:在良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的手术治疗中,激光前列腺去核术被推荐为经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)和开放式前列腺切除术(OP)的替代方法。铥光纤激光的穿透深度较浅,热损伤和囊损伤较小,因此可提供快速的学习过程。本研究比较了一名内科医师在没有导师指导的情况下实施铥光纤前列腺去核术(ThuFLEP)的前 60 个病例与经验丰富的外科医生实施开放式前列腺切除术(OP)和前列腺电切术(TURP)的结果。研究还确定了 ThuFLEP 手术时间开始趋于稳定的病例数。材料与方法:在 2021 年 11 月 1 日至 2023 年 11 月 1 日期间,将一名之前没有膀胱镜手术经验的内镜医师的最初 60 例 ThuFLEP 与经验丰富的外科医生进行的 TURP 和 OP 手术进行比较。由于最初的 60 个 ThuFLEP 病例涉及 80-120 毫升的前列腺,因此同期进行的 TURP 和 OP 手术也包括在此范围内。对各组的年龄、术前和术后前列腺体积、PSA 水平、IPSS、IPSS 生活质量 (QoL) 和最大尿流 (Qmax) 进行了评估。将 60 例连续 ThuFLEP 病例分为三组,每组 20 例(组 1、组 2 和组 3),并对手术时间、IPSS 和 Qmax 进行比较。结果TURP 的手术时间短于 ThuFLEP 和 OP(P < 0.001)。ThuFLEP 和 OP 在术后 Qmax 和 IPSS 方面无明显差异,而 TURP 的数值低于其他两种方法。就 ThuFLEP 而言,前 20 个病例的手术时间较长,但在第 2 组和第 3 组则趋于平稳(P < 0.001)。术后 Qmax 和 IPSS 值在 ThuFLEP 三组中无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论:对于大前列腺,ThuFLEP 的术后效果优于 TURP,导管插入时间和住院时间也短于 OP。与其他激光技术相比,ThuFLEP 的学习曲线短,是治疗良性前列腺增生症的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信