M. André , N. El Gani , E. Lescanne , L. Boullaud , D. Bakhos
{"title":"Outcomes at 6 months after isolated or non-isolated surgery for temporal bone cerebrospinal fluid leak in adults: A STROBE analysis","authors":"M. André , N. El Gani , E. Lescanne , L. Boullaud , D. Bakhos","doi":"10.1016/j.anorl.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The main aim of this study was to evaluate 6-month closure success in surgery for isolated or non-isolated temporal bone osteomeningeal breach (OMB). Secondary objectives were to analyze complications of closure and correlations between success and breach, treatment and patient data.</div></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><div>This was a single-center retrospective observational study of patients who underwent surgery for temporal bone OMB via a middle cranial fossa or transmastoid approach in a French university teaching hospital between 2007 and 2022, with follow-up of at least 6<!--> <!-->months. Patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence were excluded. Study data comprised gender, age, body mass index, OMB etiology, mode of discovery, audiometric and radiological data, surgical technique, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications. The primary endpoint was absence of a cerebrospinal fluid leak on MRI at 6<!--> <!-->months. Fisher's exact test or Chi<sup>2</sup> test were used for qualitative data and Student <em>t</em>-test for quantitative data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The closure success rate was 87%: 81% (3 recurrences) in the middle cranial fossa group of 16 patients and 93% in the transmastoid group of 14 patients. Postoperative audiometry showed significant improvement (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0016) for air conduction in the middle cranial fossa group. Five patients (17%) operated on via the middle cranial fossa approach and 1 (7%) operated on via the transmastoid approach had postoperative complications. OMB was in the tegmen mastoideum in 8 patients (29%), tegmen tympani in 7 (25%), tegmen antri in 4 (14%), tegmina antri and tympani in 3 (11%), antri and mastoideum in 1 (8%) and in the whole tegmen in 5 (18%). Eleven OMBs were lateral to the superior semicircular canal, 13 medial and 4 on either side.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The transmastoid approach is indicated in case of associated middle-ear procedures, patients aged over 75<!--> <!-->years or OMB lateral to the superior semicircular canal. The middle cranial fossa approach is reserved for OMB located medial to the superior semicircular canal patients under 75<!--> <!-->years of age without associated ossicular procedures. For patients with OMB medial to the superior semicircular canal who require middle-ear surgery, a combined approach can be used.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48834,"journal":{"name":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","volume":"141 6","pages":"Pages 329-334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879729624000942","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
The main aim of this study was to evaluate 6-month closure success in surgery for isolated or non-isolated temporal bone osteomeningeal breach (OMB). Secondary objectives were to analyze complications of closure and correlations between success and breach, treatment and patient data.
Material and method
This was a single-center retrospective observational study of patients who underwent surgery for temporal bone OMB via a middle cranial fossa or transmastoid approach in a French university teaching hospital between 2007 and 2022, with follow-up of at least 6 months. Patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence were excluded. Study data comprised gender, age, body mass index, OMB etiology, mode of discovery, audiometric and radiological data, surgical technique, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications. The primary endpoint was absence of a cerebrospinal fluid leak on MRI at 6 months. Fisher's exact test or Chi2 test were used for qualitative data and Student t-test for quantitative data.
Results
The closure success rate was 87%: 81% (3 recurrences) in the middle cranial fossa group of 16 patients and 93% in the transmastoid group of 14 patients. Postoperative audiometry showed significant improvement (P = 0.0016) for air conduction in the middle cranial fossa group. Five patients (17%) operated on via the middle cranial fossa approach and 1 (7%) operated on via the transmastoid approach had postoperative complications. OMB was in the tegmen mastoideum in 8 patients (29%), tegmen tympani in 7 (25%), tegmen antri in 4 (14%), tegmina antri and tympani in 3 (11%), antri and mastoideum in 1 (8%) and in the whole tegmen in 5 (18%). Eleven OMBs were lateral to the superior semicircular canal, 13 medial and 4 on either side.
Conclusion
The transmastoid approach is indicated in case of associated middle-ear procedures, patients aged over 75 years or OMB lateral to the superior semicircular canal. The middle cranial fossa approach is reserved for OMB located medial to the superior semicircular canal patients under 75 years of age without associated ossicular procedures. For patients with OMB medial to the superior semicircular canal who require middle-ear surgery, a combined approach can be used.
期刊介绍:
European Annals of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck diseases heir of one of the oldest otorhinolaryngology journals in Europe is the official organ of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL) and the the International Francophone Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIFORL). Today six annual issues provide original peer reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches and review articles giving most up-to-date insights in all areas of otology, laryngology rhinology, head and neck surgery. The European Annals also publish the SFORL guidelines and recommendations.The journal is a unique two-armed publication: the European Annals (ANORL) is an English language well referenced online journal (e-only) whereas the Annales Françaises d’ORL (AFORL), mail-order paper and online edition in French language are aimed at the French-speaking community. French language teams must submit their articles in French to the AFORL site.
Federating journal in its field, the European Annals has an Editorial board of experts with international reputation that allow to make an important contribution to communication on new research data and clinical practice by publishing high-quality articles.