Internal Rotation Measurements: Correlation between Vertebral Body Level and Goniometer Measurements on Functional Outcome Scores.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Eric J West, Derek T Dixon, Thomas W Throckmorton, David L Bernholt, Frederick M Azar, Tyler J Brolin
{"title":"Internal Rotation Measurements: Correlation between Vertebral Body Level and Goniometer Measurements on Functional Outcome Scores.","authors":"Eric J West, Derek T Dixon, Thomas W Throckmorton, David L Bernholt, Frederick M Azar, Tyler J Brolin","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.77880.3588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has shown success in the treatment of end-stage glenohumeral pathology. However, one major shortcoming has been the lack of internal rotation (IR), which can have significant functional consequences. Much research has been conducted to maximize IR after rTSA, but the literature is unclear which measurement of IR represents the \"gold standard\" between vertebral level and goniometer-based measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were prospectively enrolled into one of three groups: postoperative from rTSA, subacromial pain (SA), and normal. IR measurements were obtained either by the vertebral body level, by which radiographic markers indicated the highest level that the patient was able to reach on the body midline; or by using a goniometer while the shoulder was in 90-degree abduction as the patient stood upright.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparisons between the radiographic vertebral level and goniometer IR measurements showed significant correlations within the normal (r = - 0.43, P = 0.02) and SA pain groups (r = - 0.44, P = 0.02). The rTSA group did not quite reach statistical significance (P = 0.11), but had a moderate correlation coefficient (r = - 0.33). Accuracy of visual IR measurements was also significant. All rTSA group vertebral level measurements were within two vertebral levels, while only 84.6% of IR measurements by goniometer were within 15 degrees. Visual vertebral level measurements were found to be more accurate for the SA pain group (86.2 vs 66.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A comparison of the two primary IR measurement methods for shoulders was shown to have a correlation. This would allow for direct comparison of different literature using only one measurement method. While the correlation is not yet strong enough to allow for conversion between the two measurement types, creating a matched cohort taking into account other factors may lead to the correlation reaching this point.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2024.77880.3588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has shown success in the treatment of end-stage glenohumeral pathology. However, one major shortcoming has been the lack of internal rotation (IR), which can have significant functional consequences. Much research has been conducted to maximize IR after rTSA, but the literature is unclear which measurement of IR represents the "gold standard" between vertebral level and goniometer-based measurements.

Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled into one of three groups: postoperative from rTSA, subacromial pain (SA), and normal. IR measurements were obtained either by the vertebral body level, by which radiographic markers indicated the highest level that the patient was able to reach on the body midline; or by using a goniometer while the shoulder was in 90-degree abduction as the patient stood upright.

Results: Comparisons between the radiographic vertebral level and goniometer IR measurements showed significant correlations within the normal (r = - 0.43, P = 0.02) and SA pain groups (r = - 0.44, P = 0.02). The rTSA group did not quite reach statistical significance (P = 0.11), but had a moderate correlation coefficient (r = - 0.33). Accuracy of visual IR measurements was also significant. All rTSA group vertebral level measurements were within two vertebral levels, while only 84.6% of IR measurements by goniometer were within 15 degrees. Visual vertebral level measurements were found to be more accurate for the SA pain group (86.2 vs 66.7%).

Conclusion: A comparison of the two primary IR measurement methods for shoulders was shown to have a correlation. This would allow for direct comparison of different literature using only one measurement method. While the correlation is not yet strong enough to allow for conversion between the two measurement types, creating a matched cohort taking into account other factors may lead to the correlation reaching this point.

内旋测量:椎体水平与动态关节角度计测量对功能结果评分的相关性。
目的:反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)在治疗终末期盂肱关节病变方面取得了成功。然而,一个主要的缺陷是缺乏内旋(IR),这可能会对功能造成重大影响。很多研究都是为了最大限度地提高rTSA术后的内旋功能,但在椎体水平测量和动态关节角度计测量之间,哪种内旋测量方法才是 "金标准 "尚不明确:前瞻性地将患者分为三组:rTSA 术后组、肩峰下疼痛组(SA)和正常组。红外测量采用椎体水平,即患者在身体中线上所能达到的最高水平;或采用动态关节角度计,当患者直立时,肩部外展90度:影像学椎体水平和动态关节角度计 IR 测量值之间的比较显示,正常组(r = - 0.43,P = 0.02)和 SA 疼痛组(r = - 0.44,P = 0.02)之间存在显著相关性。rTSA 组未达到统计学意义(P = 0.11),但具有中等相关系数(r = - 0.33)。目测红外测量的准确性也很高。所有 rTSA 组的椎体水平测量值都在两个椎体水平以内,而用测角器进行的 IR 测量值只有 84.6% 在 15 度以内。研究发现,SA 疼痛组的目测椎体水平测量结果更为准确(86.2% 对 66.7%):结论:两种主要的肩部 IR 测量方法的比较结果表明两者之间存在相关性。结论:两种主要肩部红外测量方法的比较结果表明存在相关性,这样就可以只使用一种测量方法对不同文献进行直接比较。虽然相关性还不够强,不足以在两种测量方法之间进行转换,但考虑到其他因素,建立一个匹配的队列可能会使相关性达到这一水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信