Centralized Scheduling of Nursing Staff: A Rapid Review of the Literature.

Q2 Nursing
Nursing Administration Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000653
Lisa Morse, Hillary Duncan, Lynette V Apen, Karin Reese, Cecelia L Crawford
{"title":"Centralized Scheduling of Nursing Staff: A Rapid Review of the Literature.","authors":"Lisa Morse, Hillary Duncan, Lynette V Apen, Karin Reese, Cecelia L Crawford","doi":"10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Centralized scheduling of nursing professionals is regarded as an effective strategy for optimizing workforce allocation and mitigating critical staffing shortages. The aim of this review is to (1) determine the effect of centralized scheduling on unit productivity (ie, overtime, contract labor, and floating), time savings for managers, and staff perceptions and retention and (2) discuss current approaches in the implementation of centralized scheduling in inpatient hospital settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This rapid review of the evidence follows methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Four electronic bibliographic databases were searched for research published from 2013 to 2023. A total of 446 articles were identified and screened, with a total of 12 articles included. Studies and reports were included if they addressed the operational question and were conducted in an inpatient hospital within the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case study reports describe improved labor productivity (ie. less overtime and less contracted labor), more consistently balanced staffing of frontline nursing professionals, less staff reassignment (ie, floating), and increased satisfaction and time savings for managers after transitioning to a centralized scheduling model. These findings were consistent with a computational, experimental study that found centralized scheduling resulted in less labor costs and fewer undesirable shifts from the frontline nurse's point of view compared to decentralized scheduling.</p>","PeriodicalId":35640,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Administration Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Administration Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Centralized scheduling of nursing professionals is regarded as an effective strategy for optimizing workforce allocation and mitigating critical staffing shortages. The aim of this review is to (1) determine the effect of centralized scheduling on unit productivity (ie, overtime, contract labor, and floating), time savings for managers, and staff perceptions and retention and (2) discuss current approaches in the implementation of centralized scheduling in inpatient hospital settings.

Methods: This rapid review of the evidence follows methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Four electronic bibliographic databases were searched for research published from 2013 to 2023. A total of 446 articles were identified and screened, with a total of 12 articles included. Studies and reports were included if they addressed the operational question and were conducted in an inpatient hospital within the United States.

Results: Case study reports describe improved labor productivity (ie. less overtime and less contracted labor), more consistently balanced staffing of frontline nursing professionals, less staff reassignment (ie, floating), and increased satisfaction and time savings for managers after transitioning to a centralized scheduling model. These findings were consistent with a computational, experimental study that found centralized scheduling resulted in less labor costs and fewer undesirable shifts from the frontline nurse's point of view compared to decentralized scheduling.

护理人员的集中排班:文献快速回顾。
背景:护理专业人员的集中排班被认为是优化劳动力分配和缓解严重人员短缺的有效策略。本综述旨在:(1)确定集中排班对科室生产率(即加班、合同工和浮动)、管理人员时间节约、员工认知和留任的影响;(2)讨论目前在医院住院环境中实施集中排班的方法:本次证据快速综述遵循 Cochrane 快速综述方法小组的方法指导。我们在四个电子文献数据库中检索了 2013 年至 2023 年间发表的研究文章。共确定和筛选了 446 篇文章,其中纳入了 12 篇文章。如果研究和报告解决了操作问题,并且是在美国的住院医院进行的,则被纳入:案例研究报告描述了在过渡到集中排班模式后,劳动生产率得到了提高(即加班时间减少,合同工减少),一线护理专业人员的配置更加均衡,人员调动减少(即浮动),管理人员的满意度提高并节省了时间。这些发现与一项计算、实验研究相一致,该研究发现,从一线护士的角度来看,集中排班与分散排班相比,减少了劳动力成本,减少了不受欢迎的班次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Administration Quarterly
Nursing Administration Quarterly Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing Administration Quarterly (NAQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides nursing administrators with practical, up-to-date information on the effective management of nursing services in all health care settings. Published 4 times per year, each issue focuses on a selected topic providing an in depth look at the many aspects of nursing administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信