Evaluation of preoperative rectus sheath block with bupivacaine for analgesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy: a cadaveric and randomized clinical study.

IF 1.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Adrienne L Haley, Martin J Kennedy, Colleen Hickey, Wanda J Gordon-Evans, Erin Wendt-Hornickle, Caitlin C Tearney, Brian Walters, Lauren Ienello, Alonso Gp Guedes
{"title":"Evaluation of preoperative rectus sheath block with bupivacaine for analgesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy: a cadaveric and randomized clinical study.","authors":"Adrienne L Haley, Martin J Kennedy, Colleen Hickey, Wanda J Gordon-Evans, Erin Wendt-Hornickle, Caitlin C Tearney, Brian Walters, Lauren Ienello, Alonso Gp Guedes","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Phase 1: to determine the feasibility of desensitizing ventral branches of spinal nerves within the rectus sheath using an ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (USRSB). Phase 2: to determine the effect of preoperative USRSB on intraoperative responses to surgical stimulation and postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cadaveric study and prospective, randomized, blinded, parallel-arm clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>A group of five cat cadavers and 37 shelter-owned cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phase 1: anatomical dissection was performed on one uninjected cadaver. Abdominal walls were dissected in four cadavers (eight hemiabdomens) following bilateral USRSB using 1:1 new methylene blue and 0.5% bupivacaine (0.8 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> total). Phase 2: preoperative bilateral USRSB was performed with 0.8 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> of 0.25% bupivacaine (RSB) or equivalent volume of 0.9% saline (CONTROL). Intraoperative systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (f<sub>R</sub>) and vaporizer setting (vap%) were recorded before skin incision, during celiotomy and abdominal wall closure. In recovery, cats were administered robenacoxib (2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>; CONTROL) or 0.9% saline (0.1 mL kg<sup>-1</sup>; RSB) subcutaneously. Postoperative pain was evaluated for 6 hours using the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1: spinal nerves T9-L3 were identified within the rectus sheath, and stained in 0%, 40%, 63%, 75%, 100%, 88%, 50% and 13% of hemiabdomens, respectively. Phase 2: 37 cats were included (RSB, n = 17; CONTROL, n = 20). Intraoperatively, SAP, HR and f<sub>R</sub> were not significantly different between groups. Vap% was significantly lower in RSB during celiotomy (p = 0.036) and closure (p = 0.044). Postoperatively, RSB cats were 5.3 times (95% CI 1.8-8.3) more likely to require rescue analgesia than CONTROL cats.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>During surgery, USRSB with bupivacaine offered minor benefits and provided markedly less postoperative analgesia than robenacoxib, indicating that relying on USRSB provides insufficient postoperative analgesia for ovariohysterectomy in cats.</p>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2024.07.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Phase 1: to determine the feasibility of desensitizing ventral branches of spinal nerves within the rectus sheath using an ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (USRSB). Phase 2: to determine the effect of preoperative USRSB on intraoperative responses to surgical stimulation and postoperative pain.

Study design: Cadaveric study and prospective, randomized, blinded, parallel-arm clinical trial.

Animals: A group of five cat cadavers and 37 shelter-owned cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

Methods: Phase 1: anatomical dissection was performed on one uninjected cadaver. Abdominal walls were dissected in four cadavers (eight hemiabdomens) following bilateral USRSB using 1:1 new methylene blue and 0.5% bupivacaine (0.8 mL kg-1 total). Phase 2: preoperative bilateral USRSB was performed with 0.8 mL kg-1 of 0.25% bupivacaine (RSB) or equivalent volume of 0.9% saline (CONTROL). Intraoperative systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR) and vaporizer setting (vap%) were recorded before skin incision, during celiotomy and abdominal wall closure. In recovery, cats were administered robenacoxib (2 mg kg-1; CONTROL) or 0.9% saline (0.1 mL kg-1; RSB) subcutaneously. Postoperative pain was evaluated for 6 hours using the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale.

Results: Phase 1: spinal nerves T9-L3 were identified within the rectus sheath, and stained in 0%, 40%, 63%, 75%, 100%, 88%, 50% and 13% of hemiabdomens, respectively. Phase 2: 37 cats were included (RSB, n = 17; CONTROL, n = 20). Intraoperatively, SAP, HR and fR were not significantly different between groups. Vap% was significantly lower in RSB during celiotomy (p = 0.036) and closure (p = 0.044). Postoperatively, RSB cats were 5.3 times (95% CI 1.8-8.3) more likely to require rescue analgesia than CONTROL cats.

Conclusions and clinical relevance: During surgery, USRSB with bupivacaine offered minor benefits and provided markedly less postoperative analgesia than robenacoxib, indicating that relying on USRSB provides insufficient postoperative analgesia for ovariohysterectomy in cats.

评估使用布比卡因对接受卵巢切除术的猫进行术前直肠鞘阻滞镇痛的效果:一项尸体和随机临床研究。
目标:第一阶段第一阶段:确定使用超声引导下直肌鞘阻滞(USRSB)对直肌鞘内脊神经腹侧分支脱敏的可行性。第二阶段:确定术前直肠鞘阻滞对术中手术刺激反应和术后疼痛的影响:研究设计:尸体研究和前瞻性、随机、盲法、平行臂临床试验:研究设计:尸体研究和前瞻性随机盲法平行臂临床试验:方法:第一阶段:对一具未注射注射剂的尸体进行解剖。在使用 1:1 新亚甲基蓝和 0.5% 布比卡因(总量为 0.8 mL kg-1)进行双侧 USRSB 后,对四具尸体(八只半腹猫)的腹壁进行解剖。第二阶段:术前使用 0.8 mL kg-1 的 0.25% 布比卡因(RSB)或等量的 0.9% 生理盐水(CONTROL)进行双侧 USRSB。在切开皮肤前、开腹手术和关闭腹壁时记录术中收缩压(SAP)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(fR)和蒸发器设置(vap%)。恢复期间,给猫皮下注射罗苯昔布(2 毫克/千克-1;对照组)或 0.9% 生理盐水(0.1 毫升/千克-1;RSB)。使用格拉斯哥综合疼痛量表对术后 6 小时的疼痛进行评估:第一阶段:在直肌鞘内确定了 T9-L3 脊神经,并分别在 0%、40%、63%、75%、100%、88%、50% 和 13% 的半腱鞘中染色。第二阶段:共纳入 37 只猫(RSB,n = 17;CONTROL,n = 20)。术中,SAP、HR 和 fR 在组间无明显差异。在腹腔切开术(p = 0.036)和闭合术(p = 0.044)期间,RSB 的 Vap% 明显较低。术后,RSB 猫需要辅助镇痛的可能性是 CONTROL 猫的 5.3 倍(95% CI 1.8-8.3):在手术过程中,使用布比卡因的 USRSB 带来的益处较小,术后镇痛效果明显低于罗苯昔布,这表明依靠 USRSB 为猫咪卵巢切除术提供的术后镇痛效果不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
97 days
期刊介绍: Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome: the basic sciences; pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management equipment intensive care chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals welfare issues associated with pain and distress education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia. Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信