Pattern of pareses in 5q-spinal muscular atrophy.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2024-08-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864241263420
Zeljko Uzelac, Beate Schwäble, Johannes Dorst, Angela Rosenbohm, Kurt Wollinsky, Claudia D Wurster, Janna S Steinbreier, Albert C Ludolph
{"title":"Pattern of pareses in 5q-spinal muscular atrophy.","authors":"Zeljko Uzelac, Beate Schwäble, Johannes Dorst, Angela Rosenbohm, Kurt Wollinsky, Claudia D Wurster, Janna S Steinbreier, Albert C Ludolph","doi":"10.1177/17562864241263420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective study investigates the pattern of pareses in 5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) to identify disease-specific characteristics and potential differences from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and spinobulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA). Detailed knowledge about pareses patterns in SMA facilitates differential diagnosis and supports therapeutic monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2021, and June 2021, 66 SMA patients (59.1% male, aged 33.6 ± 15.2 years) were included in the study. Most patients had SMA type II (<i>n</i> = 28) or SMA type III (<i>n</i> = 28), seven patients had SMA type I, and three patients had SMA type IV. We analyzed the pattern of pareses using the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) scoring system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both, upper and lower limbs muscle weakness was less pronounced in distal (upper limbs: MRC median 3.0 (interquartile range 1.5-3.5); lower limbs: 1.5 (0.5-3.0)) compared to proximal muscle groups (upper limbs: 2.0 (1.5-2.6); <i>p</i> < 0.001; lower limbs: 0.5 (0.5-1.5); <i>p</i> < 0.001). Thenar muscles were stronger than other small hand muscles (3.0 (2.0-3.5) vs 3.0 (1.5-3.5); <i>p</i> = 0.004). Muscles had more strength in upper (2.3 (1.5-3.1)) compared to lower limbs (1.1 (0.5-2.3); <i>p</i> < 0.001) and in flexors compared to extensors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified a specific pattern of muscle paresis in SMA which is different from the pattern of paresis in ALS and SBMA. As a rule of thumb, the pattern of pareses is similar, but not identical to ALS in distal, but different in proximal muscle groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11350530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241263420","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This prospective study investigates the pattern of pareses in 5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) to identify disease-specific characteristics and potential differences from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and spinobulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA). Detailed knowledge about pareses patterns in SMA facilitates differential diagnosis and supports therapeutic monitoring.

Methods: Between January 2021, and June 2021, 66 SMA patients (59.1% male, aged 33.6 ± 15.2 years) were included in the study. Most patients had SMA type II (n = 28) or SMA type III (n = 28), seven patients had SMA type I, and three patients had SMA type IV. We analyzed the pattern of pareses using the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) scoring system.

Results: In both, upper and lower limbs muscle weakness was less pronounced in distal (upper limbs: MRC median 3.0 (interquartile range 1.5-3.5); lower limbs: 1.5 (0.5-3.0)) compared to proximal muscle groups (upper limbs: 2.0 (1.5-2.6); p < 0.001; lower limbs: 0.5 (0.5-1.5); p < 0.001). Thenar muscles were stronger than other small hand muscles (3.0 (2.0-3.5) vs 3.0 (1.5-3.5); p = 0.004). Muscles had more strength in upper (2.3 (1.5-3.1)) compared to lower limbs (1.1 (0.5-2.3); p < 0.001) and in flexors compared to extensors.

Conclusion: We identified a specific pattern of muscle paresis in SMA which is different from the pattern of paresis in ALS and SBMA. As a rule of thumb, the pattern of pareses is similar, but not identical to ALS in distal, but different in proximal muscle groups.

5q脊髓性肌萎缩症的瘫痪模式。
研究背景这项前瞻性研究调查了5q相关性脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)的瘫痪模式,以确定疾病的特异性特征以及与肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症(ALS)和脊髓小脑性肌萎缩症(SBMA)的潜在差异。详细了解 SMA 的瘫痪模式有助于鉴别诊断和支持治疗监测:方法:2021 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间,66 名 SMA 患者(59.1% 为男性,年龄为 33.6 ± 15.2 岁)被纳入研究。大多数患者为 SMA II 型(28 人)或 SMA III 型(28 人),7 名患者为 SMA I 型,3 名患者为 SMA IV 型。我们使用英国医学研究委员会(MRC)的评分系统分析了患者的瘫痪模式:结果:在这两种患者中,上肢和下肢的肌无力在远端(上肢、下肢)都不太明显:MRC 中位数为 3.0(四分位间范围为 1.5-3.5);下肢为 1.5(0.5-3.5):上肢:2.0 (1.5-2.6); p p = 0.004)。与下肢(1.1(0.5-2.3);p)相比,上肢(2.3(1.5-3.1))肌肉的力量更强:我们发现了 SMA 肌肉瘫痪的特殊模式,它不同于 ALS 和 SBMA 的瘫痪模式。根据经验,远端肌肉群的瘫痪模式与 ALS 相似,但不完全相同,而近端肌肉群的瘫痪模式则不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信