Tyler A Tetreault, Tiffany N Phan, Tishya A L Wren, Michael J Heffernan, John B Emans, Lawrence I Karlin, Amer F Samdani, Ilkka J Helenius, Michael G Vitale, Lindsay M Andras
{"title":"Osteotomies at the Time of Graduation Surgery: How Much Do We Get From Them?","authors":"Tyler A Tetreault, Tiffany N Phan, Tishya A L Wren, Michael J Heffernan, John B Emans, Lawrence I Karlin, Amer F Samdani, Ilkka J Helenius, Michael G Vitale, Lindsay M Andras","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, multicenter.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine if posterior column osteotomies (PCO) at time of conversion from growth friendly instrumentation (GFI) to definitive fusion in early onset scoliosis (EOS) graduates impacts outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Increasing spinal rigidity following treatment of EOS with GFI can limit curve correction at time of conversion to definitive spinal fusion. PCO are often employed at the time of fusion to improve flexibility. This technique's efficacy has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with EOS with GFI undergoing conversion to fusion were grouped by those that did or did not have PCO. Patients with inadequate radiographs, <2 years follow-up, or three-column osteotomies at time of fusion were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight hundred thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria. One hundred seventy-five (21%) patients had PCO. Age at index surgery was younger (6.6 vs . 7.4 y, P =0.0009), and the mean duration of GFI was greater (6.2 vs. 5.5 y, P =0.009) in the PCO group. Before fusion, curve magnitude was similar between the groups (PCO=61.9°, no PCO=59.3°, P =0.18). On average 4.4 osteotomies (range: 1-12) were performed for the PCO group and EBL (PCO=820 cc vs . no PCO=752 cc, P <0.01) and surgical time (PCO=403 min vs . no PCO=349 min, P <0.01) were greater. Postoperatively, mean curve correction (PCO=16.6°, no PCO=14.4°, P =0.18) was similar. Accounting for preoperative curve magnitude, there was a relationship between number of PCOs and curve correction ( P =0.04). There was no relationship between degrees of correction per osteotomy and duration of GFI ( P =0.12). Postoperative complications at 2 years were similar (PCO=25% vs. no PCO=27%, P =0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EOS graduates achieve minimal correction at time of conversion regardless of whether PCOs are performed. PCOs increase EBL and operative time but have a similar complication rate. More PCOs resulted in more correction, though less than that anticipated in a previously uninstrumented spine.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"E161-E166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective, multicenter.
Objective: Determine if posterior column osteotomies (PCO) at time of conversion from growth friendly instrumentation (GFI) to definitive fusion in early onset scoliosis (EOS) graduates impacts outcomes.
Summary of background data: Increasing spinal rigidity following treatment of EOS with GFI can limit curve correction at time of conversion to definitive spinal fusion. PCO are often employed at the time of fusion to improve flexibility. This technique's efficacy has not been studied.
Methods: Patients with EOS with GFI undergoing conversion to fusion were grouped by those that did or did not have PCO. Patients with inadequate radiographs, <2 years follow-up, or three-column osteotomies at time of fusion were excluded.
Results: Eight hundred thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria. One hundred seventy-five (21%) patients had PCO. Age at index surgery was younger (6.6 vs . 7.4 y, P =0.0009), and the mean duration of GFI was greater (6.2 vs. 5.5 y, P =0.009) in the PCO group. Before fusion, curve magnitude was similar between the groups (PCO=61.9°, no PCO=59.3°, P =0.18). On average 4.4 osteotomies (range: 1-12) were performed for the PCO group and EBL (PCO=820 cc vs . no PCO=752 cc, P <0.01) and surgical time (PCO=403 min vs . no PCO=349 min, P <0.01) were greater. Postoperatively, mean curve correction (PCO=16.6°, no PCO=14.4°, P =0.18) was similar. Accounting for preoperative curve magnitude, there was a relationship between number of PCOs and curve correction ( P =0.04). There was no relationship between degrees of correction per osteotomy and duration of GFI ( P =0.12). Postoperative complications at 2 years were similar (PCO=25% vs. no PCO=27%, P =0.63).
Conclusions: EOS graduates achieve minimal correction at time of conversion regardless of whether PCOs are performed. PCOs increase EBL and operative time but have a similar complication rate. More PCOs resulted in more correction, though less than that anticipated in a previously uninstrumented spine.
期刊介绍：
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
