Detection of choroidal vascular features in diabetic patients without clinically visible diabetic retinopathy by optical coherence tomography angiography: A systemic review and meta-analysis.
{"title":"Detection of choroidal vascular features in diabetic patients without clinically visible diabetic retinopathy by optical coherence tomography angiography: A systemic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Qing Zhao, Linxin Wei, Youxin Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers have explored choroidal features in the eyes of diabetic patients without clinically visible diabetic retinopathy (DM-NoDR) employing optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA); however, the results are controversial. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Ovid databases for OCTA studies comparing choroidal parameters between DM-NoDR eyes and healthy controls or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) eyes. Outcomes included choriocapillaris (CC) perfusion density (PD), flow area (FA), and flow deficits (FD). 36 studies were finally included in the quantitative meta-analysis, involving 1,908 DM-NoDR eyes, 792 NPDR eyes, and 1,391 healthy control eyes. DM-NoDR eyes had significantly lower CC PD in the foveal region (P=0.0005) and superior parafoveal region (P=0.003) than healthy control eyes, but no significant difference was found in other parafoveal subregions (P>0.05). DM-NoDR eyes were also associated with increased CC FD (P<0.00001) and decreased CC FA (P<0.0001) in whole OCTA images with a 3×3 mm<sup>2</sup> field of view (FOV). Compared with all-stage NPDR eyes, DM-NoDR eyes had higher CC PD in the foveal region (P<0.0001), parafoveal region (P<0.00001), and the whole OCTA images with a 6×6 mm<sup>2</sup> FOV (P<0.00001). Early choroidal microvascular changes may precede clinically visible DR and can be detected early using OCTA in DM-NoDR eyes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.08.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Researchers have explored choroidal features in the eyes of diabetic patients without clinically visible diabetic retinopathy (DM-NoDR) employing optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA); however, the results are controversial. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Ovid databases for OCTA studies comparing choroidal parameters between DM-NoDR eyes and healthy controls or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) eyes. Outcomes included choriocapillaris (CC) perfusion density (PD), flow area (FA), and flow deficits (FD). 36 studies were finally included in the quantitative meta-analysis, involving 1,908 DM-NoDR eyes, 792 NPDR eyes, and 1,391 healthy control eyes. DM-NoDR eyes had significantly lower CC PD in the foveal region (P=0.0005) and superior parafoveal region (P=0.003) than healthy control eyes, but no significant difference was found in other parafoveal subregions (P>0.05). DM-NoDR eyes were also associated with increased CC FD (P<0.00001) and decreased CC FA (P<0.0001) in whole OCTA images with a 3×3 mm2 field of view (FOV). Compared with all-stage NPDR eyes, DM-NoDR eyes had higher CC PD in the foveal region (P<0.0001), parafoveal region (P<0.00001), and the whole OCTA images with a 6×6 mm2 FOV (P<0.00001). Early choroidal microvascular changes may precede clinically visible DR and can be detected early using OCTA in DM-NoDR eyes.
期刊介绍:
Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.