He/She/They - gender inclusivity in developing and using health-related questionnaires: a scoping review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Desiree Scott, Sarah Derrett, Valentina Prevolnik Rupel, Jennifer Jelsma, Gagan Gurung, Georgina Yaa Oduro, Cassie Withey-Rila
{"title":"He/She/They - gender inclusivity in developing and using health-related questionnaires: a scoping review.","authors":"Desiree Scott, Sarah Derrett, Valentina Prevolnik Rupel, Jennifer Jelsma, Gagan Gurung, Georgina Yaa Oduro, Cassie Withey-Rila","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03765-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To ensure the recognition and participation of all potential respondents in health research, surveys and care, including LGBTQIA + broadly, and trans people, specifically, the use of inclusive language should be considered. This scoping review aimed to identify and describe strategies considered for gender inclusivity in development and use of health questionnaires and Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of peer reviewed publications between January 2000 and September 2022 was conducted in Scopus, ProQuest Central, Ovid Medline (PubMed and EBSCO). Two reviewers independently screened identified publications titles and abstracts, followed by full text screening and data extraction from eligible articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search of over 5000 publications, retained 18; most acknowledged gaps in representation and advocated for gender-inclusive language. Eight articles discussed exclusion from health care and health research for gender minority groups due to the use of gendered language. Improved reliability, validity and response rates were associated with the use of gender-neutral language in seven articles. Only one article reported finding irritation among cisgender males when non-binary gender response options were used. One paper, focussing on instruments for Rheumatoid Arthritis, discussed gaps in representation if diverse gender identities were not considered when developing PROMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review points to the importance of adopting gender-inclusive language in health questionnaires and surveys to reduce the risk of excluding gender minority groups. Despite finding very few specific examples of how others have used gender-inclusive language in health questionnaires, many strengths of gender-inclusive language usage were identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03765-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To ensure the recognition and participation of all potential respondents in health research, surveys and care, including LGBTQIA + broadly, and trans people, specifically, the use of inclusive language should be considered. This scoping review aimed to identify and describe strategies considered for gender inclusivity in development and use of health questionnaires and Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs).

Methods: A systematic search of peer reviewed publications between January 2000 and September 2022 was conducted in Scopus, ProQuest Central, Ovid Medline (PubMed and EBSCO). Two reviewers independently screened identified publications titles and abstracts, followed by full text screening and data extraction from eligible articles.

Results: The search of over 5000 publications, retained 18; most acknowledged gaps in representation and advocated for gender-inclusive language. Eight articles discussed exclusion from health care and health research for gender minority groups due to the use of gendered language. Improved reliability, validity and response rates were associated with the use of gender-neutral language in seven articles. Only one article reported finding irritation among cisgender males when non-binary gender response options were used. One paper, focussing on instruments for Rheumatoid Arthritis, discussed gaps in representation if diverse gender identities were not considered when developing PROMs.

Conclusion: This scoping review points to the importance of adopting gender-inclusive language in health questionnaires and surveys to reduce the risk of excluding gender minority groups. Despite finding very few specific examples of how others have used gender-inclusive language in health questionnaires, many strengths of gender-inclusive language usage were identified.

Abstract Image

他/她/他们--编制和使用健康相关问卷时的性别包容性:范围界定审查。
目的:为确保所有潜在受访者(包括广义上的 LGBTQIA+,特别是变性人)在健康研究、调查和护理中得到认可并参与其中,应考虑使用包容性语言。本范围综述旨在确定和描述在开发和使用健康问卷和患者报告结果测量(PROMs)时考虑性别包容性的策略:在 Scopus、ProQuest Central、Ovid Medline(PubMed 和 EBSCO)上对 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月间的同行评审出版物进行了系统检索。两名审稿人分别独立筛选确定的出版物标题和摘要,然后对符合条件的文章进行全文筛选和数据提取:在对 5000 多篇出版物进行搜索后,保留了 18 篇文章;其中大部分承认在代表性方面存在差距,并倡导使用性别包容性语言。八篇文章讨论了性别少数群体因使用性别语言而被排除在医疗保健和健康研究之外的问题。有 7 篇文章指出,使用性别中性语言可提高可靠性、有效性和回复率。只有一篇文章报告称,在使用非二元性别回答选项时,发现顺性别男性受到了刺激。一篇关注类风湿性关节炎工具的文章讨论了在开发 PROMs 时如果不考虑不同性别身份的代表性差距:本范围界定综述指出了在健康问卷和调查中采用性别包容性语言的重要性,以减少将性别少数群体排除在外的风险。尽管很少有具体例子说明其他国家如何在健康问卷中使用性别全纳语言,但还是发现了许多使用性别全纳语言的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信