Monitoring Everyday Upper Extremity Function in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Secondary, Retrospective Analysis from ncRNAPain.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2024-08-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/9993438
Gudrun-Karin Kindl, Ann-Kristin Reinhold, Fabiola Escolano-Lozano, Johannes Degenbeck, Frank Birklein, Heike L Rittner, Karolin Teichmüller
{"title":"Monitoring Everyday Upper Extremity Function in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Secondary, Retrospective Analysis from ncRNAPain.","authors":"Gudrun-Karin Kindl, Ann-Kristin Reinhold, Fabiola Escolano-Lozano, Johannes Degenbeck, Frank Birklein, Heike L Rittner, Karolin Teichmüller","doi":"10.1155/2024/9993438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) represents a rare complication following injury to a limb. The DASH questionnaire (disability of arm, shoulder, and hand) evaluates everyday arm function. We assessed the DASH and its subitems in comparison to patients with brachial plexus lesions or fracture controls, analysed it over time, and in relation to active range of motion (ROM), to determine patients' impairment and trajectory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The dataset included 193 patients with upper extremity CRPS from the noncoding RNA (ncRNA) Pain cohort, 36 fracture controls, and 12 patients with traumatic brachial plexus lesions. For the clinical and psychological characterisation, questionnaires and a goniometer for the measurement of ROM were utilized. Thirty-three patients were followed up after approximately 2.5 years of guideline treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CRPS patients had a similar mean DASH of 54.7 (standard deviation (S.D.) ±21) as brachial plexus lesion patients (<i>M</i> = 51.4, S.D. ± 16.1) but different significantly from fracture controls (<i>M</i> = 21.2, S.D. ± 21.1). Pain and older age were predictors of the DASH. Activities requiring force or impact on the arm, shoulder, or hand were mostly affected in patients with CRPS. After 2.5 years of standard treatment, the mean DASH score fell to 41.3 (S.D. ± 25.2), weakness in leisure activities was recuperated, pain feelings were lessened, and ROM, e.g., wrist flexion, recovered by 36°. Two-thirds of patients improved in both the DASH and the ROM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CRPS is as disabling as a complete loss of arm function in brachial plexus lesions and exhibits only partial recovery. Developing QuickDASH versions for CRPS patients could reduce the load of questions in clinical studies. It would be prudent to consider the unexpected age dependency of the DASH in future studies. This trial is registered with DRKS00008964.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2024 ","pages":"9993438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9993438","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) represents a rare complication following injury to a limb. The DASH questionnaire (disability of arm, shoulder, and hand) evaluates everyday arm function. We assessed the DASH and its subitems in comparison to patients with brachial plexus lesions or fracture controls, analysed it over time, and in relation to active range of motion (ROM), to determine patients' impairment and trajectory.

Methods: The dataset included 193 patients with upper extremity CRPS from the noncoding RNA (ncRNA) Pain cohort, 36 fracture controls, and 12 patients with traumatic brachial plexus lesions. For the clinical and psychological characterisation, questionnaires and a goniometer for the measurement of ROM were utilized. Thirty-three patients were followed up after approximately 2.5 years of guideline treatment.

Results: CRPS patients had a similar mean DASH of 54.7 (standard deviation (S.D.) ±21) as brachial plexus lesion patients (M = 51.4, S.D. ± 16.1) but different significantly from fracture controls (M = 21.2, S.D. ± 21.1). Pain and older age were predictors of the DASH. Activities requiring force or impact on the arm, shoulder, or hand were mostly affected in patients with CRPS. After 2.5 years of standard treatment, the mean DASH score fell to 41.3 (S.D. ± 25.2), weakness in leisure activities was recuperated, pain feelings were lessened, and ROM, e.g., wrist flexion, recovered by 36°. Two-thirds of patients improved in both the DASH and the ROM.

Conclusions: CRPS is as disabling as a complete loss of arm function in brachial plexus lesions and exhibits only partial recovery. Developing QuickDASH versions for CRPS patients could reduce the load of questions in clinical studies. It would be prudent to consider the unexpected age dependency of the DASH in future studies. This trial is registered with DRKS00008964.

监测复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者的日常上肢功能:来自 ncRNAPain 的二次回顾性分析。
目的:复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)是一种罕见的肢体损伤后并发症。DASH问卷(手臂、肩部和手部残疾)可评估日常手臂功能。我们对 DASH 及其子项目进行了评估,并与臂丛神经损伤患者或骨折对照组进行了比较,分析了其随时间变化的情况以及与主动运动范围 (ROM) 的关系,以确定患者的损伤情况和轨迹:数据集包括非编码 RNA(ncRNA)疼痛队列中的 193 名上肢 CRPS 患者、36 名骨折对照组患者和 12 名外伤性臂丛神经损伤患者。在临床和心理特征分析方面,采用了调查问卷和动态关节角度计测量ROM。经过约2.5年的指导治疗后,对33名患者进行了随访:CRPS患者的DASH平均值为54.7(标准差(S.D. )±21),与臂丛神经损伤患者(M = 51.4,S.D. ±16.1)相似,但与骨折对照组(M = 21.2,S.D. ±21.1)有显著差异。疼痛和年龄较大是DASH的预测因素。在 CRPS 患者中,需要手臂、肩部或手部受力或撞击的活动大多受到影响。经过 2.5 年的标准治疗后,DASH 平均得分降至 41.3(标准偏差 ± 25.2),休闲活动中的无力感得到恢复,疼痛感减轻,腕关节活动度(如腕关节屈曲)恢复了 36°。三分之二的患者在DASH和ROM方面都有所改善:结论:CRPS 与臂丛神经损伤导致的手臂功能完全丧失一样具有致残性,并且仅表现出部分恢复。为 CRPS 患者开发 QuickDASH 版本可以减少临床研究中的问题。在未来的研究中,应谨慎考虑 DASH 意外的年龄依赖性。该试验的注册号为 DRKS00008964。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信