Telerehabilitation from the perspective of patients and healthcare providers: A 3-year follow-up study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lucia Willadino Braga, Sandro Barbosa Oliveira, Lígia Maria do Nascimento Souza
{"title":"Telerehabilitation from the perspective of patients and healthcare providers: A 3-year follow-up study.","authors":"Lucia Willadino Braga, Sandro Barbosa Oliveira, Lígia Maria do Nascimento Souza","doi":"10.3233/NRE-230385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is important to investigate satisfaction and perception of the effectiveness of telerehabilitation and its outcomes post-COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the patients' and healthcare providers' level of satisfaction with telerehabilitation and perception of its efficacy and describe how it became an established resource in a network of rehabilitation hospitals post-pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The online survey about their experience with telerehabilitation was completed by 2,755 patients (322 new patients and 2,433 existing patients), and 668 providers from 26 different specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients and providers rated remote care as effective. There were no differences in scores between existing patients and new patients and the majority reported that their expectations were met. Most patients described their remote consults as good as or better than in-person, while providers mostly preferred in-person sessions. Despite most modalities having returned to in-person practice, there is still a significant percentage of telerehabilitation consults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three years after the start of the pandemic, despite a return to in-person treatment, we see a telerehabilitation culture being constructed as a resource to supplement the rehabilitation process, with potential for establishing this model in a network of rehabilitation hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"55 1","pages":"103-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-230385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is important to investigate satisfaction and perception of the effectiveness of telerehabilitation and its outcomes post-COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: Evaluate the patients' and healthcare providers' level of satisfaction with telerehabilitation and perception of its efficacy and describe how it became an established resource in a network of rehabilitation hospitals post-pandemic.

Methods: The online survey about their experience with telerehabilitation was completed by 2,755 patients (322 new patients and 2,433 existing patients), and 668 providers from 26 different specialties.

Results: Most patients and providers rated remote care as effective. There were no differences in scores between existing patients and new patients and the majority reported that their expectations were met. Most patients described their remote consults as good as or better than in-person, while providers mostly preferred in-person sessions. Despite most modalities having returned to in-person practice, there is still a significant percentage of telerehabilitation consults.

Conclusion: Three years after the start of the pandemic, despite a return to in-person treatment, we see a telerehabilitation culture being constructed as a resource to supplement the rehabilitation process, with potential for establishing this model in a network of rehabilitation hospitals.

从患者和医疗服务提供者的角度看远程康复:为期 3 年的跟踪研究。
背景调查COVID-19大流行后远程康复的满意度、对其有效性的感知及其结果非常重要:评估患者和医疗服务提供者对远程康复的满意度和对其有效性的看法,并描述远程康复如何在大流行后成为康复医院网络中的既定资源:来自 26 个不同专科的 2,755 名患者(322 名新患者和 2,433 名现有患者)和 668 名医疗服务提供者完成了有关远程康复体验的在线调查:大多数患者和医疗服务提供者都认为远程医疗是有效的。现有患者和新患者的评分没有差异,大多数患者表示他们的期望得到了满足。大多数患者认为他们的远程会诊效果好于或优于面对面会诊,而医疗服务提供者则更倾向于面对面会诊。尽管大多数模式已恢复到面对面的做法,但远程康复咨询仍占相当大的比例:结论:在大流行开始三年后,尽管恢复了面对面治疗,但我们看到远程康复文化正在形成,成为补充康复过程的一种资源,并有可能在康复医院网络中建立这种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信