Potential and Pitfalls of Postoperative Volumetric Assessment of Extent of Resection in High-Grade Glioma in Resource-Constrained Settings.

IF 0.9 3区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neurology India Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-31 DOI:10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-23-00585
Abhishek Kumar, Kuntal K Das, Soumen Kanjilal, Neeraj Jain, Prabhaker Mishra, Shagun Misra, Kamlesh S Bhaisora, Anant Mehrotra, Awadhesh K Jaiswal, Raj Kumar
{"title":"Potential and Pitfalls of Postoperative Volumetric Assessment of Extent of Resection in High-Grade Glioma in Resource-Constrained Settings.","authors":"Abhishek Kumar, Kuntal K Das, Soumen Kanjilal, Neeraj Jain, Prabhaker Mishra, Shagun Misra, Kamlesh S Bhaisora, Anant Mehrotra, Awadhesh K Jaiswal, Raj Kumar","doi":"10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-23-00585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While literature suggests the need for routine postoperative volumetric estimation of the EOR and residual tumour volume (RTV) in all cases of gliomas, the utility and feasibility of this protocol in resource-constrained centers remain underinvestigated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our objective was to study the feasibility of volumetric EOR in routine neurosurgical practice and determine correlation with surgeons' intraoperative estimation of EOR. The secondary objective was to determine the survival impact of EOR and RTV on survival.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A prospective study of pathologically proven high-grade gliomas (WHO grades 3 and 4) in adults was conducted at a tertiary care center. Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained for volumetric analysis using OsiriX software and manual segmentation. Overall survival and predictors were studied using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative volumetry was feasible in 31% patients (n = 25) of study eligible patients (n = 84). The median EOR, CE-PTV, and CE-RTV were 79.1%, 69.8 cm3, and 8.7 cm3, respectively. There was a poor correlation of surgeons' intraoperative impression and volumetric data (P = 0.359). Interestingly, the EOR was not significantly associated with the survival time (P = 0.920), while tumor grade, molecular profile, Ki 67 score, and postoperative functional status showed statistically significant impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Logistic difficulties impede routine implementation of this protocol in developing countries. MRI volumetry is clearly more accurate than surgeons' intraoperative estimation of EOR. Notwithstanding the role of EOR in survival, our study reveals a perhaps bigger impact of tumor biology and postoperative functional status in this equation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19429,"journal":{"name":"Neurology India","volume":"72 4","pages":"756-762"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology India","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-23-00585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While literature suggests the need for routine postoperative volumetric estimation of the EOR and residual tumour volume (RTV) in all cases of gliomas, the utility and feasibility of this protocol in resource-constrained centers remain underinvestigated.

Objectives: Our objective was to study the feasibility of volumetric EOR in routine neurosurgical practice and determine correlation with surgeons' intraoperative estimation of EOR. The secondary objective was to determine the survival impact of EOR and RTV on survival.

Methods and materials: A prospective study of pathologically proven high-grade gliomas (WHO grades 3 and 4) in adults was conducted at a tertiary care center. Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained for volumetric analysis using OsiriX software and manual segmentation. Overall survival and predictors were studied using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.

Results: Postoperative volumetry was feasible in 31% patients (n = 25) of study eligible patients (n = 84). The median EOR, CE-PTV, and CE-RTV were 79.1%, 69.8 cm3, and 8.7 cm3, respectively. There was a poor correlation of surgeons' intraoperative impression and volumetric data (P = 0.359). Interestingly, the EOR was not significantly associated with the survival time (P = 0.920), while tumor grade, molecular profile, Ki 67 score, and postoperative functional status showed statistically significant impact.

Conclusion: Logistic difficulties impede routine implementation of this protocol in developing countries. MRI volumetry is clearly more accurate than surgeons' intraoperative estimation of EOR. Notwithstanding the role of EOR in survival, our study reveals a perhaps bigger impact of tumor biology and postoperative functional status in this equation.

在资源有限的情况下,术后对高级别胶质瘤切除范围进行容积评估的潜力与陷阱
背景:虽然文献表明有必要对所有胶质瘤病例进行常规术后EOR和残余肿瘤体积(RTV)的体积估算,但在资源有限的中心,这一方案的实用性和可行性仍未得到充分研究:我们的目的是研究在常规神经外科实践中采用体积 EOR 的可行性,并确定其与外科医生术中估计的 EOR 的相关性。次要目标是确定 EOR 和 RTV 对生存的影响:一家三级医疗中心对病理证实的高级别胶质瘤(WHO 3 级和 4 级)进行了前瞻性研究。术前和术后磁共振成像(MRI)通过OsiriX软件和手动分割进行容积分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 回归分析法对总生存率和预测因素进行了研究:在符合研究条件的患者(84 人)中,31% 的患者(25 人)可以进行术后容积测量。EOR、CE-PTV 和 CE-RTV 的中位数分别为 79.1%、69.8 cm3 和 8.7 cm3。外科医生的术中印象与体积数据的相关性较差(P = 0.359)。有趣的是,EOR与生存时间无明显相关性(P = 0.920),而肿瘤分级、分子特征、Ki 67评分和术后功能状态则有显著统计学影响:结论:后勤方面的困难阻碍了这一方案在发展中国家的常规实施。核磁共振成像体积测量法显然比外科医生术中估计的EOR更准确。尽管EOR对生存率有影响,但我们的研究显示,肿瘤生物学和术后功能状态对这一等式的影响可能更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology India
Neurology India 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
70.40%
发文量
434
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Neurology India (ISSN 0028-3886) is Bi-monthly publication of Neurological Society of India. Neurology India, the show window of the progress of Neurological Sciences in India, has successfully completed 50 years of publication in the year 2002. ‘Neurology India’, along with the Neurological Society of India, has grown stronger with the passing of every year. The full articles of the journal are now available on internet with more than 20000 visitors in a month and the journal is indexed in MEDLINE and Index Medicus, Current Contents, Neuroscience Citation Index and EMBASE in addition to 10 other indexing avenues. This specialty journal reaches to about 2000 neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-psychiatrists, and others working in the fields of neurology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信