Pediatric Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis: Overcoming the Disability!

IF 0.9 3区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neurology India Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-31 DOI:10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-23-00245
Anant Mehrotra, Satya D Pandey, Suyash Singh, Soumen Kanjilal, Sanjog Gajbhiye, Priyadarshi Dikshit, Ashutosh Kumar, Pawan K Verma, Ved P Maurya, Kamlesh S Bhaisora, Kuntal K Das, Arun K Srivastava, Awadhesh K Jaiswal, Raj Kumar
{"title":"Pediatric Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis: Overcoming the Disability!","authors":"Anant Mehrotra, Satya D Pandey, Suyash Singh, Soumen Kanjilal, Sanjog Gajbhiye, Priyadarshi Dikshit, Ashutosh Kumar, Pawan K Verma, Ved P Maurya, Kamlesh S Bhaisora, Kuntal K Das, Arun K Srivastava, Awadhesh K Jaiswal, Raj Kumar","doi":"10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-23-00245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Congenital spondylolisthesis is characterized by dysplasia of the facet joint or congenital defect in the pars.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study highlights the clinical and radiological profile, various treatment options, and outcomes in patients with pediatric congenital lumbar and lumbosacral spondylolisthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis and follow-up of 22 patients were conducted presented with radiological diagnosis of congenital lumbar/lumbosacral spondylolisthesis (2018-2021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients (91%) had L5-S1 listhesis and two patients (9%) had L4-L5 listhesis. Six (27.3%) patients had low-grade listhesis (grades 1-2), 16 (72.7%) had high-grade listhesis (grades 3-5). Seventeen (77.3%) had S1, three (13.6%) had L5, and two (9%) had both L4-L5 radiculopathy. All patients had neurogenic claudication. One had an associated spina bifida occulta. Six (27.3%) patients underwent two-level fixation, and 16 (72.7%) underwent three-level fixation. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS TLIF) was done in two patients. Revision of at least one screw was done in three patients. After one year of follow-up, all the patients had 75-100% relief in radicular pain and neurogenic claudication. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score in preop for all patients was 41-60% and postoperatively they showed an improvement in ODI score (0-20). The postoperative low back pain score on the Numeric Rating Scale was 0-1 for all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Congenital lumbar spondylolisthesis usually presents with high-grade listhesis. Management of such cases is a surgical challenge but posterior decompression resulted in relief of pain in all patients. However, in situ fixation without reduction is also effective in selective cases where attempts to reduce the listhesis result in a decline in intraoperative neuromonitoring parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":19429,"journal":{"name":"Neurology India","volume":"72 4","pages":"742-746"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology India","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-23-00245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Congenital spondylolisthesis is characterized by dysplasia of the facet joint or congenital defect in the pars.

Objective: Our study highlights the clinical and radiological profile, various treatment options, and outcomes in patients with pediatric congenital lumbar and lumbosacral spondylolisthesis.

Methods: A retrospective analysis and follow-up of 22 patients were conducted presented with radiological diagnosis of congenital lumbar/lumbosacral spondylolisthesis (2018-2021).

Results: Twenty patients (91%) had L5-S1 listhesis and two patients (9%) had L4-L5 listhesis. Six (27.3%) patients had low-grade listhesis (grades 1-2), 16 (72.7%) had high-grade listhesis (grades 3-5). Seventeen (77.3%) had S1, three (13.6%) had L5, and two (9%) had both L4-L5 radiculopathy. All patients had neurogenic claudication. One had an associated spina bifida occulta. Six (27.3%) patients underwent two-level fixation, and 16 (72.7%) underwent three-level fixation. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS TLIF) was done in two patients. Revision of at least one screw was done in three patients. After one year of follow-up, all the patients had 75-100% relief in radicular pain and neurogenic claudication. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score in preop for all patients was 41-60% and postoperatively they showed an improvement in ODI score (0-20). The postoperative low back pain score on the Numeric Rating Scale was 0-1 for all patients.

Conclusion: Congenital lumbar spondylolisthesis usually presents with high-grade listhesis. Management of such cases is a surgical challenge but posterior decompression resulted in relief of pain in all patients. However, in situ fixation without reduction is also effective in selective cases where attempts to reduce the listhesis result in a decline in intraoperative neuromonitoring parameters.

小儿腰骶椎滑脱症:克服残疾!
背景:先天性脊柱滑脱症的特点是面关节发育不良或椎旁先天性缺损:我们的研究强调了小儿先天性腰椎和腰骶椎滑脱症患者的临床和放射学特征、各种治疗方案和疗效:对22例经放射学诊断为先天性腰椎/腰骶椎滑脱症(2018-2021年)的患者进行回顾性分析和随访:20名患者(91%)患有L5-S1列表缺损,2名患者(9%)患有L4-L5列表缺损。6名(27.3%)患者为低级列表滑脱(1-2级),16名(72.7%)患者为高级列表滑脱(3-5级)。17名患者(77.3%)患有S1,3名患者(13.6%)患有L5,2名患者(9%)患有L4-L5神经根病。所有患者都有神经源性跛行。一名患者伴有隐性脊柱裂。6名患者(27.3%)接受了两级固定,16名患者(72.7%)接受了三级固定。两名患者接受了微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS TLIF)。三名患者进行了至少一枚螺钉的翻修。经过一年的随访,所有患者的根性疼痛和神经源性跛行均缓解了 75%-100%。所有患者术前的奥斯韦特里残疾指数(ODI)评分为41%-60%,术后他们的ODI评分(0-20分)均有改善。所有患者术后腰痛的数字评分量表得分均为 0-1:结论:先天性腰椎滑脱症通常表现为高位滑脱。结论:先天性腰椎滑脱症通常表现为高位椎弓根滑脱,此类病例的手术治疗是一项挑战,但后路减压术可缓解所有患者的疼痛。然而,在试图减轻椎弓根滑脱导致术中神经监测参数下降的选择性病例中,不减压的原位固定也很有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology India
Neurology India 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
70.40%
发文量
434
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Neurology India (ISSN 0028-3886) is Bi-monthly publication of Neurological Society of India. Neurology India, the show window of the progress of Neurological Sciences in India, has successfully completed 50 years of publication in the year 2002. ‘Neurology India’, along with the Neurological Society of India, has grown stronger with the passing of every year. The full articles of the journal are now available on internet with more than 20000 visitors in a month and the journal is indexed in MEDLINE and Index Medicus, Current Contents, Neuroscience Citation Index and EMBASE in addition to 10 other indexing avenues. This specialty journal reaches to about 2000 neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-psychiatrists, and others working in the fields of neurology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信