Contrast of muscle magnetic resonance imaging and pathological findings of muscle tissue in patients with anti-aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase antibodies.
{"title":"Contrast of muscle magnetic resonance imaging and pathological findings of muscle tissue in patients with anti-aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase antibodies.","authors":"Hiroshi Takei, Yasushi Kondo, Satoshi Takanashi, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Shiro Matsubara, Yuko Kaneko","doi":"10.1093/mr/roae070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: to determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (mri) findings reflect the pathological features of inflammatory myopathies: </strong>Methods: Patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) diagnosed using the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria in our university between 2005 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. IIMs were subclassified into the anti-ARS syndrome (ASSD), immune-mediated necrotizing myositis (IMNM), Dermatomyositis DM and others. Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI and muscle biopsy specimens were assessed in IIMs followed by the comparison among the four subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRI findings were available for 62 patients and histopathological findings were available for 27 patients. Perifascicular atrophy or necrosis in the muscle tissues from the patients with IIM was more frequently observed in patients with subcutaneous and fascial high signal intensity (HSI) on MRI than those without. Four-group comparison among ASSD, IMNM, DM and others revealed HSI in fasciae on MRI was more frequently observed in patients with ASSD and DM than others. Perifascicular atrophy or necrosis in muscle tissues was more frequently observed in patients with ASSD than in others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with ASSD had distinct MRI features compared with anti-ARS negative patients. The fascial high signal intensity on MRI may reflect distinctive pathological features of muscles.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roae070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: to determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (mri) findings reflect the pathological features of inflammatory myopathies: Methods: Patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) diagnosed using the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria in our university between 2005 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. IIMs were subclassified into the anti-ARS syndrome (ASSD), immune-mediated necrotizing myositis (IMNM), Dermatomyositis DM and others. Fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI and muscle biopsy specimens were assessed in IIMs followed by the comparison among the four subgroups.
Results: MRI findings were available for 62 patients and histopathological findings were available for 27 patients. Perifascicular atrophy or necrosis in the muscle tissues from the patients with IIM was more frequently observed in patients with subcutaneous and fascial high signal intensity (HSI) on MRI than those without. Four-group comparison among ASSD, IMNM, DM and others revealed HSI in fasciae on MRI was more frequently observed in patients with ASSD and DM than others. Perifascicular atrophy or necrosis in muscle tissues was more frequently observed in patients with ASSD than in others.
Conclusion: Patients with ASSD had distinct MRI features compared with anti-ARS negative patients. The fascial high signal intensity on MRI may reflect distinctive pathological features of muscles.
期刊介绍:
Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery.
Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered.
Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions