Comparative efficacy of antifungal drugs for the treatment of oral candidiasis in HIV-positive patients: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jiong Lin, Cai-xia Peng, Wei-man Huang
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of antifungal drugs for the treatment of oral candidiasis in HIV-positive patients: A Bayesian network meta-analysis","authors":"Jiong Lin,&nbsp;Cai-xia Peng,&nbsp;Wei-man Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.medcli.2024.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oral candidiasis infection is particularly prevalent among individuals in HIV-positive patients. Antifungal drugs have shown promising therapeutic effects in treating oral candidiasis in HIV-positive patients. However, the selection of specific antifungal drugs for the treatment of oral candidiasis in HIV-positive patients lacks evidence-based guidelines. This study aims to address this gap by conducting a comprehensive review of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and performing a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of different antifungal drugs in treating oral candidiasis in HIV-positive patients. A systematic search was conducted in databases including EMBASE, Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant articles. Additionally, key pertinent sources in the literatures were also reviewed. All studies published prior to August 2023 were eligible for inclusion. Two researchers independently conducted the screening of literature, extraction of data, and evaluation of quality. Pairwise and network meta-analysis were then performed to assess the primary outcomes of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42024513912). Twenty-six RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, involving a total of 3145 patients and evaluating seven interventions (placebo, fluconazole, itraconazole, nystatin, clotrimazole, ketoconazole, miconazole). Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis showed fluconazole was significantly efficacy in increasing mycological cure rates when compared with placebo, clotrimazole, and nystatin. Ketoconazole and miconazole were significantly efficacy in increasing mycological cure rates when compared with nystatin. Network meta-analysis also suggested the efficacy of the seven interventions in increasing mycological cure rates was ranked as follows: placebo (35.3%), fluconazole (95.2%), itraconazole (61.6%), nystatin (17.0%), clotrimazole (52.7%), ketoconazole (69.2%), miconazole (69.1%). The available evidence indicates that fluconazole had the greatest possibility to increase mycological cure rates in HIV-positive patients, while, nystatin was the least effective antifungal drug in increasing mycological cure rates in HIV-positive patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18578,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Clinica","volume":"164 2","pages":"Pages 76-83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025775324003932","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oral candidiasis infection is particularly prevalent among individuals in HIV-positive patients. Antifungal drugs have shown promising therapeutic effects in treating oral candidiasis in HIV-positive patients. However, the selection of specific antifungal drugs for the treatment of oral candidiasis in HIV-positive patients lacks evidence-based guidelines. This study aims to address this gap by conducting a comprehensive review of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and performing a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of different antifungal drugs in treating oral candidiasis in HIV-positive patients. A systematic search was conducted in databases including EMBASE, Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant articles. Additionally, key pertinent sources in the literatures were also reviewed. All studies published prior to August 2023 were eligible for inclusion. Two researchers independently conducted the screening of literature, extraction of data, and evaluation of quality. Pairwise and network meta-analysis were then performed to assess the primary outcomes of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42024513912). Twenty-six RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, involving a total of 3145 patients and evaluating seven interventions (placebo, fluconazole, itraconazole, nystatin, clotrimazole, ketoconazole, miconazole). Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis showed fluconazole was significantly efficacy in increasing mycological cure rates when compared with placebo, clotrimazole, and nystatin. Ketoconazole and miconazole were significantly efficacy in increasing mycological cure rates when compared with nystatin. Network meta-analysis also suggested the efficacy of the seven interventions in increasing mycological cure rates was ranked as follows: placebo (35.3%), fluconazole (95.2%), itraconazole (61.6%), nystatin (17.0%), clotrimazole (52.7%), ketoconazole (69.2%), miconazole (69.1%). The available evidence indicates that fluconazole had the greatest possibility to increase mycological cure rates in HIV-positive patients, while, nystatin was the least effective antifungal drug in increasing mycological cure rates in HIV-positive patients.
治疗 HIV 阳性患者口腔念珠菌病的抗真菌药物疗效比较:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
口腔念珠菌感染在艾滋病毒阳性患者中尤为普遍。抗真菌药物在治疗 HIV 阳性患者的口腔念珠菌病方面显示出良好的治疗效果。然而,如何选择特定的抗真菌药物来治疗 HIV 阳性患者的口腔念珠菌病却缺乏循证指南。本研究旨在通过对相关随机对照试验(RCT)进行全面回顾和网络荟萃分析,评估不同抗真菌药物治疗艾滋病病毒阳性患者口腔念珠菌病的疗效,从而弥补这一空白。我们在 EMBASE、Web of Science、Medline 和 Cochrane 等数据库中进行了系统检索,以确定相关文章。此外,还查阅了文献中的主要相关资料。所有在 2023 年 8 月之前发表的研究均符合纳入条件。两名研究人员独立进行了文献筛选、数据提取和质量评估。然后进行配对分析和网络荟萃分析,以评估纳入的随机对照试验(RCT)的主要结果。研究方案已在 PROSPERO 数据库(CRD42024513912)中注册。本次荟萃分析纳入了 26 项随机对照试验,共涉及 3145 名患者,评估了 7 种干预措施(安慰剂、氟康唑、伊曲康唑、奈替汀、克霉唑、酮康唑、咪康唑)。配对荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析表明,与安慰剂、克霉唑和硝司他丁相比,氟康唑在提高霉菌学治愈率方面疗效显著。酮康唑和咪康唑与奈司他丁相比,在提高霉菌治愈率方面有显著疗效。网络荟萃分析还表明,七种干预措施在提高霉菌学治愈率方面的疗效排序如下:安慰剂(35.3%)、氟康唑(95.2%)、伊曲康唑(61.6%)、奈司他丁(17.0%)、克霉唑(52.7%)、酮康唑(69.2%)、咪康唑(69.1%)。现有证据表明,氟康唑最有可能提高艾滋病毒阳性患者的霉菌学治愈率,而在提高艾滋病毒阳性患者的霉菌学治愈率方面,硝司他丁是效果最差的抗真菌药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina Clinica
Medicina Clinica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
295
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Medicina Clínica, fundada en 1943, es una publicación quincenal dedicada a la promoción de la investigación y de la práctica clínica entre los especialistas de la medicina interna, así como otras especialidades. Son características fundamentales de esta publicación el rigor científico y metodológico de sus artículos, la actualidad de los temas y, sobre todo, su sentido práctico, buscando siempre que la información sea de la mayor utilidad en la práctica clínica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信