Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Low-Dose Triple Single-Pill Combination Compared With Placebo for Initial Treatment of Hypertension.

IF 21.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Anthony Rodgers, Abdul Salam, Aletta E Schutte, William C Cushman, H Asita de Silva, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Diederick Grobbee, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Dike B Ojji, Neil R Poulter, Markus P Schlaich, Suzanne Oparil, Wilko Spiering, Bryan Williams, Jackson T Wright, Alexis Gutierez, Aliu Sanni, Poopalan Lakshman, Deirdre McMullen, Gotabhaya Ranasinghe, Chris Gianacas, Mathangi Shanthakumar, Xiaoqiu Liu, Nelson Wang, Paul Whelton
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Low-Dose Triple Single-Pill Combination Compared With Placebo for Initial Treatment of Hypertension.","authors":"Anthony Rodgers, Abdul Salam, Aletta E Schutte, William C Cushman, H Asita de Silva, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Diederick Grobbee, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Dike B Ojji, Neil R Poulter, Markus P Schlaich, Suzanne Oparil, Wilko Spiering, Bryan Williams, Jackson T Wright, Alexis Gutierez, Aliu Sanni, Poopalan Lakshman, Deirdre McMullen, Gotabhaya Ranasinghe, Chris Gianacas, Mathangi Shanthakumar, Xiaoqiu Liu, Nelson Wang, Paul Whelton","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-pill combinations of 3 or more low-dose blood pressure (BP)-lowering drugs hold promise for initial or early treatment of hypertension.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a placebo-controlled trial of a new single-pill combination containing low doses of telmisartan, amlodipine, and indapamide in 2 dose options to assess efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial enrolled adults with hypertension receiving 0 to 1 BP-lowering drugs. After a 2-week placebo run-in during which any BP-lowering medication was stopped, participants were eligible if home systolic BP (SBP) was 130 to 154 mm Hg. Participants were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to GMRx2 ¼ dose (telmisartan 10 mg/amlodipine 1.25 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg), GMRx2 ½ dose (telmisartan 20 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg/indapamide 1.25 mg), or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was difference in change in home SBP from randomization to week 4, and primary safety outcome was treatment discontinuation due to an adverse event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From June 14, 2021 to October 18, 2023, a total of 295 participants (mean age: 51 years; 56% female) were randomized and 96% completed the trial. Baseline mean home BP was 139/86 mm Hg and clinic BP was 138/86 mm Hg after placebo run-in. The placebo-corrected least square mean differences in home SBP at Week 4 were -7.3 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.5 to -10.2) for GMRx2 ¼ dose and -8.2 mm Hg (95% CI: -5.2 to -11.3) for GMRx2 ½ dose; reductions for clinic BP were 8.0/4.0 and 9.5/4.9 mm Hg. At Week 4, clinic BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) was 37%, 65%, and 70% for placebo, GMRx2 ¼ dose, and GMRx2 ½ dose, respectively (both doses P < 0.001 vs placebo). Placebo, GMRx2-triple ¼, and GMRx2 ½ treatment discontinuation due to an adverse event occurred in 1 (1.6%), 0, and 6 (5.1%), respectively; out of normal range serum sodium or potassium was observed in 4 (6.3%), 12 (10.6%), and 12 (10.1%), respectively, but no participant had a serum sodium <130/>150 mmol/L or potassium <3.0/>6.0 mmol/L. Serious adverse events were reported by 2 participants in the placebo and GMRx2 ½ groups and none in the GMRx2 ¼ group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a population with mild-to-moderate BP elevation, both dose versions of the novel low-dose triple single-pill combination showed good tolerability and clinically relevant BP reductions compared with placebo. (Efficacy and Safety of GRMx2 Compared to Placebo for the Treatment of Hypertension: NCT04518306).</p>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Single-pill combinations of 3 or more low-dose blood pressure (BP)-lowering drugs hold promise for initial or early treatment of hypertension.

Objectives: We conducted a placebo-controlled trial of a new single-pill combination containing low doses of telmisartan, amlodipine, and indapamide in 2 dose options to assess efficacy and safety.

Methods: This international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial enrolled adults with hypertension receiving 0 to 1 BP-lowering drugs. After a 2-week placebo run-in during which any BP-lowering medication was stopped, participants were eligible if home systolic BP (SBP) was 130 to 154 mm Hg. Participants were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to GMRx2 ¼ dose (telmisartan 10 mg/amlodipine 1.25 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg), GMRx2 ½ dose (telmisartan 20 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg/indapamide 1.25 mg), or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was difference in change in home SBP from randomization to week 4, and primary safety outcome was treatment discontinuation due to an adverse event.

Results: From June 14, 2021 to October 18, 2023, a total of 295 participants (mean age: 51 years; 56% female) were randomized and 96% completed the trial. Baseline mean home BP was 139/86 mm Hg and clinic BP was 138/86 mm Hg after placebo run-in. The placebo-corrected least square mean differences in home SBP at Week 4 were -7.3 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.5 to -10.2) for GMRx2 ¼ dose and -8.2 mm Hg (95% CI: -5.2 to -11.3) for GMRx2 ½ dose; reductions for clinic BP were 8.0/4.0 and 9.5/4.9 mm Hg. At Week 4, clinic BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) was 37%, 65%, and 70% for placebo, GMRx2 ¼ dose, and GMRx2 ½ dose, respectively (both doses P < 0.001 vs placebo). Placebo, GMRx2-triple ¼, and GMRx2 ½ treatment discontinuation due to an adverse event occurred in 1 (1.6%), 0, and 6 (5.1%), respectively; out of normal range serum sodium or potassium was observed in 4 (6.3%), 12 (10.6%), and 12 (10.1%), respectively, but no participant had a serum sodium <130/>150 mmol/L or potassium <3.0/>6.0 mmol/L. Serious adverse events were reported by 2 participants in the placebo and GMRx2 ½ groups and none in the GMRx2 ¼ group.

Conclusions: In a population with mild-to-moderate BP elevation, both dose versions of the novel low-dose triple single-pill combination showed good tolerability and clinically relevant BP reductions compared with placebo. (Efficacy and Safety of GRMx2 Compared to Placebo for the Treatment of Hypertension: NCT04518306).

与安慰剂相比,新型低剂量三联单药组合用于高血压初始治疗的有效性和安全性。
背景:3种或3种以上低剂量降压药物的单药组合有望用于高血压的初始或早期治疗:我们对一种新的单药组合进行了安慰剂对照试验,该组合包含低剂量的替米沙坦、氨氯地平和吲达帕胺,有两种剂量选择,以评估其疗效和安全性:这项国际随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组试验招募了正在服用 0 至 1 种降压药的成人高血压患者。在停用任何降压药的两周安慰剂试验后,如果患者的家庭收缩压(SBP)为 130 至 154 mm Hg,则符合条件。参与者按 2:2:1 的比例被随机分配到 GMRx2 ¼ 剂量(替米沙坦 10 毫克/氨氯地平 1.25 毫克/吲达帕胺 0.625 毫克)、GMRx2 ½ 剂量(替米沙坦 20 毫克/氨氯地平 2.5 毫克/吲达帕胺 1.25 毫克)或安慰剂中。主要疗效结局为从随机化到第4周的家庭SBP变化差异,主要安全性结局为因不良事件而中断治疗:从 2021 年 6 月 14 日至 2023 年 10 月 18 日,共有 295 名参与者(平均年龄:51 岁;56% 为女性)被随机分配,96% 的参与者完成了试验。安慰剂试运行后,基线平均家庭血压为 139/86 mm Hg,门诊血压为 138/86 mm Hg。第 4 周时,GMRx2 ¼ 剂量的家庭 SBP 经安慰剂校正后的最小平方均值差异为 -7.3 mm Hg(95% CI:-4.5 至 -10.2),GMRx2 ½ 剂量的家庭 SBP 经安慰剂校正后的最小平方均值差异为 -8.2 mm Hg(95% CI:-5.2 至 -11.3);门诊血压的降幅分别为 8.0/4.0 和 9.5/4.9 mm Hg。第 4 周,临床血压控制在 150 mmol/L 或血钾 6.0 mmol/L。安慰剂组和 GMRx2 ½ 组中有 2 名参与者报告了严重不良事件,GMRx2 ¼ 组中没有:结论:与安慰剂相比,在轻度至中度血压升高人群中,两种剂量的新型低剂量三联单片复方制剂均显示出良好的耐受性和临床相关的血压降低效果。(GRMx2与安慰剂相比治疗高血压的有效性和安全性:NCT04518306)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信