Anorectal physiology and colonic motility in children with a history of tethered cord syndrome.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Julia M J van der Zande, Shruthi Srinivas, Ilan J N Koppen, Marc A Benninga, Richard J Wood, Raul E Sanchez, Neetu B Puri, Karla Vaz, Desale Yacob, Carlo Di Lorenzo, Peter L Lu
{"title":"Anorectal physiology and colonic motility in children with a history of tethered cord syndrome.","authors":"Julia M J van der Zande, Shruthi Srinivas, Ilan J N Koppen, Marc A Benninga, Richard J Wood, Raul E Sanchez, Neetu B Puri, Karla Vaz, Desale Yacob, Carlo Di Lorenzo, Peter L Lu","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.12357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The understanding of the impact of tethered cord syndrome (TCS) on the physiology of the colorectal area is limited. Our aim was to describe anorectal and colonic motility in children with TCS and compare the findings to those of children with functional constipation (FC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of children with TCS who had an anorectal manometry (ARM) performed at our institution from January 2011 to September 2023. We recorded demographics, medical and surgical history, clinical symptoms, and treatment at time of ARM, ARM findings (resting pressure, push maneuver, rectal sensation, rectoanal inhibitory reflex [RAIR], and RAIR duration), and the final interpretation of colonic manometry (CM) if performed. We identified age and sex-matched control groups of children with FC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 24 children with TCS (50% female) who had ARM testing (median age at ARM 6.0 years, interquartile range 4.0-11.8 years). All children had constipation at time of ARM. Nineteen children had detethering surgery before ARM was performed. No significant differences in ARM parameters were found between children who had detethering surgery before ARM and children with FC. Among the 24 children, 14 also had a CM performed (13/14 after detethering surgery). No significant differences in colonic motility were found between children with a history of TCS and children with FC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anorectal physiology and colonic motility are similar between children with a history of TCS and children with FC, suggesting that the underlying pathophysiology of defecatory disorders in children with and without history of TCS is similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"976-982"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.12357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The understanding of the impact of tethered cord syndrome (TCS) on the physiology of the colorectal area is limited. Our aim was to describe anorectal and colonic motility in children with TCS and compare the findings to those of children with functional constipation (FC).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of children with TCS who had an anorectal manometry (ARM) performed at our institution from January 2011 to September 2023. We recorded demographics, medical and surgical history, clinical symptoms, and treatment at time of ARM, ARM findings (resting pressure, push maneuver, rectal sensation, rectoanal inhibitory reflex [RAIR], and RAIR duration), and the final interpretation of colonic manometry (CM) if performed. We identified age and sex-matched control groups of children with FC.

Results: We included 24 children with TCS (50% female) who had ARM testing (median age at ARM 6.0 years, interquartile range 4.0-11.8 years). All children had constipation at time of ARM. Nineteen children had detethering surgery before ARM was performed. No significant differences in ARM parameters were found between children who had detethering surgery before ARM and children with FC. Among the 24 children, 14 also had a CM performed (13/14 after detethering surgery). No significant differences in colonic motility were found between children with a history of TCS and children with FC.

Conclusions: Anorectal physiology and colonic motility are similar between children with a history of TCS and children with FC, suggesting that the underlying pathophysiology of defecatory disorders in children with and without history of TCS is similar.

有系索综合征病史的儿童的肛门直肠生理和结肠运动。
目的:人们对系索综合征(TCS)对结肠直肠部位生理学的影响了解有限。我们的目的是描述系带综合征患儿的肛门直肠和结肠运动情况,并将研究结果与功能性便秘(FC)患儿进行比较:我们对 2011 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月期间在我院接受肛门直肠测压(ARM)的 TCS 患儿进行了回顾性研究。我们记录了人口统计学特征、内外科病史、临床症状、ARM 时的治疗情况、ARM 结果(静息压、推压动作、直肠感觉、直肠肛门抑制性反射 [RAIR] 和 RAIR 持续时间)以及结肠测压 (CM) 的最终解释(如果进行了结肠测压)。我们确定了与 FC 患儿年龄和性别匹配的对照组:我们纳入了 24 名接受 ARM 测试的 TCS 患儿(50% 为女性)(接受 ARM 测试时的中位年龄为 6.0 岁,四分位距为 4.0-11.8 岁)。所有儿童在进行 ARM 时均有便秘。19名儿童在进行ARM之前接受了脱系手术。在ARM之前接受过脱系手术的患儿与接受FC手术的患儿在ARM参数上没有明显差异。在 24 名患儿中,有 14 名患儿也进行了 CM(13/14 名患儿在脱系手术后进行了 CM)。结论:有TCS病史的患儿与FC患儿的结肠运动没有明显差异:结论:有 TCS 病史的儿童和 FC 患儿的肛门直肠生理学和结肠运动能力相似,这表明有 TCS 病史的儿童和无 TCS 病史的儿童排便障碍的潜在病理生理学相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
467
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信