Pre-delivery BMI and the Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation in Very Preterm Infants

IF 2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Inshirah Sgayer MD , Saaed Awwad MD , Ala Aiob MD , Susana Mustafa Mikhail MD , Lior Lowenstein MD , Marwan Odeh MD
{"title":"Pre-delivery BMI and the Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation in Very Preterm Infants","authors":"Inshirah Sgayer MD ,&nbsp;Saaed Awwad MD ,&nbsp;Ala Aiob MD ,&nbsp;Susana Mustafa Mikhail MD ,&nbsp;Lior Lowenstein MD ,&nbsp;Marwan Odeh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine the relation between maternal pre-delivery BMI and the accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) in very preterm infants (&lt;32 weeks gestation).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included singleton infants born between January 2010 and March 2023, at gestational ages 23<sup>0</sup> to 31<sup>6</sup> weeks, at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Absolute weight, percentage error, absolute percentage error, and overestimation and underestimation of EFW were compared between women with pre-delivery normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.99 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.99 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and obesity (BMI &gt;35.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Multivariate linear regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders were performed to assess relations of maternal pre-conception and of pre-delivery BMI, with EFW accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Included were 286 pregnancies. The absolute difference, percentage error, absolute percentage error, error within the 10% range, and underestimation or overestimation of EFW were similar between the groups. The multivariate linear regression analyses did not show significant associations of pre-conceptional BMI or of pre-delivery BMI with the percentage error. However, for small for gestational age compared to appropriate for gestational age fetuses, the percentage error was greater (8.9% vs. –0.6%, β = 0.35, <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001) and the absolute percentage error was greater (11.0% vs. 6.7%, <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001). Small for gestational age fetuses were at risk of fetal weight overestimation (percentage error exceeding 15%); OR 7.20 (95% CI 2.91–17.80).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Maternal pre-delivery BMI was not found to be related to EFW accuracy in very preterm infants. Nevertheless, EFW should be interpreted carefully, as it may underdiagnose poor fetal growth in this population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324004663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the relation between maternal pre-delivery BMI and the accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) in very preterm infants (<32 weeks gestation).

Methods

This retrospective study included singleton infants born between January 2010 and March 2023, at gestational ages 230 to 316 weeks, at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Absolute weight, percentage error, absolute percentage error, and overestimation and underestimation of EFW were compared between women with pre-delivery normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.99 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.99 kg/m2), and obesity (BMI >35.0 kg/m2). Multivariate linear regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders were performed to assess relations of maternal pre-conception and of pre-delivery BMI, with EFW accuracy.

Results

Included were 286 pregnancies. The absolute difference, percentage error, absolute percentage error, error within the 10% range, and underestimation or overestimation of EFW were similar between the groups. The multivariate linear regression analyses did not show significant associations of pre-conceptional BMI or of pre-delivery BMI with the percentage error. However, for small for gestational age compared to appropriate for gestational age fetuses, the percentage error was greater (8.9% vs. –0.6%, β = 0.35, P < 0.001) and the absolute percentage error was greater (11.0% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001). Small for gestational age fetuses were at risk of fetal weight overestimation (percentage error exceeding 15%); OR 7.20 (95% CI 2.91–17.80).

Conclusions

Maternal pre-delivery BMI was not found to be related to EFW accuracy in very preterm infants. Nevertheless, EFW should be interpreted carefully, as it may underdiagnose poor fetal growth in this population.

极早产儿分娩前体重指数和胎儿体重估计的准确性。
研究目的研究极早产儿中产妇分娩前体重指数(BMI)与超声估算胎儿体重(EFW)准确性之间的关系(方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在一所大学附属三级医院出生的孕龄为 23+0 至 31+6 周的单胎婴儿。比较了分娩前体重正常(BMI 18.5-24.99 kg/m2)、超重(BMI 25.0-29.99 kg/m2)和肥胖(BMI >35.0 kg/m2)产妇的绝对体重、百分比误差、绝对百分比误差以及高估和低估EFW。对潜在的混杂因素进行了多变量线性回归分析,以评估孕产妇孕前和分娩前体重指数与 EFW 准确性的关系:结果:共纳入 286 例妊娠。各组间的绝对差异、百分比误差、绝对百分比误差、10%范围内的误差以及EFW的低估或高估情况相似。多变量线性回归分析表明,受孕前体重指数或分娩前体重指数与百分比误差无明显关联。然而,小胎龄胎儿与适龄胎儿相比,百分比误差更大(8.9% 对 -0.6%,β = 0.35,P < 0.001),绝对百分比误差更大(11.0% 对 6.7%,P < 0.001)。胎龄小的胎儿有胎儿体重被高估的风险(百分比误差超过 15%);几率比 7.20 (95% CI 2.91-17.80):结论:在极早产儿中,母体分娩前体重指数与胎儿体重测量的准确性无关。尽管如此,EFW仍需谨慎解释,因为它可能会对该人群中胎儿发育不良的情况诊断不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
302
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信