{"title":"Pre-delivery BMI and the Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation in Very Preterm Infants","authors":"Inshirah Sgayer MD , Saaed Awwad MD , Ala Aiob MD , Susana Mustafa Mikhail MD , Lior Lowenstein MD , Marwan Odeh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine the relation between maternal pre-delivery BMI and the accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) in very preterm infants (<32 weeks gestation).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included singleton infants born between January 2010 and March 2023, at gestational ages 23<sup>0</sup> to 31<sup>6</sup> weeks, at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Absolute weight, percentage error, absolute percentage error, and overestimation and underestimation of EFW were compared between women with pre-delivery normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.99 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.99 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and obesity (BMI >35.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Multivariate linear regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders were performed to assess relations of maternal pre-conception and of pre-delivery BMI, with EFW accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Included were 286 pregnancies. The absolute difference, percentage error, absolute percentage error, error within the 10% range, and underestimation or overestimation of EFW were similar between the groups. The multivariate linear regression analyses did not show significant associations of pre-conceptional BMI or of pre-delivery BMI with the percentage error. However, for small for gestational age compared to appropriate for gestational age fetuses, the percentage error was greater (8.9% vs. –0.6%, β = 0.35, <em>P <</em> 0.001) and the absolute percentage error was greater (11.0% vs. 6.7%, <em>P <</em> 0.001). Small for gestational age fetuses were at risk of fetal weight overestimation (percentage error exceeding 15%); OR 7.20 (95% CI 2.91–17.80).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Maternal pre-delivery BMI was not found to be related to EFW accuracy in very preterm infants. Nevertheless, EFW should be interpreted carefully, as it may underdiagnose poor fetal growth in this population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324004663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To examine the relation between maternal pre-delivery BMI and the accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) in very preterm infants (<32 weeks gestation).
Methods
This retrospective study included singleton infants born between January 2010 and March 2023, at gestational ages 230 to 316 weeks, at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Absolute weight, percentage error, absolute percentage error, and overestimation and underestimation of EFW were compared between women with pre-delivery normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.99 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.99 kg/m2), and obesity (BMI >35.0 kg/m2). Multivariate linear regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders were performed to assess relations of maternal pre-conception and of pre-delivery BMI, with EFW accuracy.
Results
Included were 286 pregnancies. The absolute difference, percentage error, absolute percentage error, error within the 10% range, and underestimation or overestimation of EFW were similar between the groups. The multivariate linear regression analyses did not show significant associations of pre-conceptional BMI or of pre-delivery BMI with the percentage error. However, for small for gestational age compared to appropriate for gestational age fetuses, the percentage error was greater (8.9% vs. –0.6%, β = 0.35, P < 0.001) and the absolute percentage error was greater (11.0% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001). Small for gestational age fetuses were at risk of fetal weight overestimation (percentage error exceeding 15%); OR 7.20 (95% CI 2.91–17.80).
Conclusions
Maternal pre-delivery BMI was not found to be related to EFW accuracy in very preterm infants. Nevertheless, EFW should be interpreted carefully, as it may underdiagnose poor fetal growth in this population.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.