Comparison of Systemic Exposure Between Epinephrine Delivered via Metered-Dose Inhalation and Intramuscular Injection.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jack Yongfeng Zhang, Mary Ziping Luo, Tony Marrs, Edward M Kerwin, Don A Bukstein
{"title":"Comparison of Systemic Exposure Between Epinephrine Delivered via Metered-Dose Inhalation and Intramuscular Injection.","authors":"Jack Yongfeng Zhang, Mary Ziping Luo, Tony Marrs, Edward M Kerwin, Don A Bukstein","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2024.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Primatene<sup>®</sup> MIST, an epinephrine metered-dose inhaler (MDI), has long been questioned by some medical professionals for asthma treatment despite having been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. One of the primary reasons for their concerns stemmed from potential cardiovascular complications following epinephrine administration. However, the majority of documented cardiovascular complications seemed to occur following the injection route of the epinephrine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the systemic exposure of epinephrine delivered through different administration routes and to understand its relationship with cardiovascular effects. Since albuterol inhalers are commonly recommended for asthma, albuterol was also studied as a comparator drug. <b><i>Method:</i></b> A randomized, evaluator-blinded, three-arm crossover study was conducted in 28 healthy adult subjects to compare the profiles of systemic exposure for epinephrine delivered by MDI versus epinephrine intramuscular (IM) injection and albuterol MDI. Serially sampled plasma epinephrine and albuterol levels were measured and compared between treatment groups. Safety was assessed by adverse events, serial vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and clinical laboratory tests obtained at each crossover dosing visit. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Systemic exogenous drug exposure for inhaled epinephrine MDI (39 pg/mL × hour) was ∼9 times lower than that of epinephrine IM (435 pg/mL × hour) and 122 times lower than that of albuterol MDI (3453 pg/mL × hour) after dose normalization. The C<sub>max</sub> in epinephrine MDI (345 pg/mL) was approximately half of that of epinephrine IM (816 pg/mL) and that of albuterol MDI (681 pg/mL). Plasma drug concentrations for epinephrine MDI dropped rapidly to baseline (∼0.6 hour), while epinephrine IM took ∼8 hours, and albuterol MDI required more than 24 hours. Epinephrine MDI and albuterol MDI resulted in minimal, clinically insignificant changes in vital signs and ECGs, whereas epinephrine IM led to mild transient increases in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and corrected QT interval. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Epinephrine MDI (Primatene MIST) had ∼9 times lower systemic drug exposure (SDE) than that of epinephrine IM and ∼122 times lower than that of albuterol MDI. The lower SDE of inhaled epinephrine also correlated with reassuring safety findings, with no significant cardiovascular adverse effects found, compared with transient effects seen after IM epinephrine. <b>Clinical trial registration number:</b> NCT04207840.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2024.0025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primatene® MIST, an epinephrine metered-dose inhaler (MDI), has long been questioned by some medical professionals for asthma treatment despite having been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. One of the primary reasons for their concerns stemmed from potential cardiovascular complications following epinephrine administration. However, the majority of documented cardiovascular complications seemed to occur following the injection route of the epinephrine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the systemic exposure of epinephrine delivered through different administration routes and to understand its relationship with cardiovascular effects. Since albuterol inhalers are commonly recommended for asthma, albuterol was also studied as a comparator drug. Method: A randomized, evaluator-blinded, three-arm crossover study was conducted in 28 healthy adult subjects to compare the profiles of systemic exposure for epinephrine delivered by MDI versus epinephrine intramuscular (IM) injection and albuterol MDI. Serially sampled plasma epinephrine and albuterol levels were measured and compared between treatment groups. Safety was assessed by adverse events, serial vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and clinical laboratory tests obtained at each crossover dosing visit. Results: Systemic exogenous drug exposure for inhaled epinephrine MDI (39 pg/mL × hour) was ∼9 times lower than that of epinephrine IM (435 pg/mL × hour) and 122 times lower than that of albuterol MDI (3453 pg/mL × hour) after dose normalization. The Cmax in epinephrine MDI (345 pg/mL) was approximately half of that of epinephrine IM (816 pg/mL) and that of albuterol MDI (681 pg/mL). Plasma drug concentrations for epinephrine MDI dropped rapidly to baseline (∼0.6 hour), while epinephrine IM took ∼8 hours, and albuterol MDI required more than 24 hours. Epinephrine MDI and albuterol MDI resulted in minimal, clinically insignificant changes in vital signs and ECGs, whereas epinephrine IM led to mild transient increases in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and corrected QT interval. Conclusion: Epinephrine MDI (Primatene MIST) had ∼9 times lower systemic drug exposure (SDE) than that of epinephrine IM and ∼122 times lower than that of albuterol MDI. The lower SDE of inhaled epinephrine also correlated with reassuring safety findings, with no significant cardiovascular adverse effects found, compared with transient effects seen after IM epinephrine. Clinical trial registration number: NCT04207840.

通过计量吸入和肌肉注射给药的肾上腺素全身暴露量比较
背景:Primatene® MIST 是一种肾上腺素计量吸入器 (MDI),尽管已获得美国食品药品管理局的批准,但长期以来一直受到一些医疗专业人士的质疑。他们担心的主要原因之一是使用肾上腺素后可能出现心血管并发症。然而,大多数记录在案的心血管并发症似乎都发生在注射肾上腺素后。本研究旨在评估通过不同给药途径给药的肾上腺素的全身暴露量,并了解其与心血管影响之间的关系。由于阿布特罗吸入器通常被推荐用于治疗哮喘,因此也将阿布特罗作为对比药物进行研究。研究方法在 28 名健康成年受试者中进行了一项随机、评估者盲法、三臂交叉研究,以比较肾上腺素计量吸入器给药与肾上腺素肌肉注射(IM)和阿布特罗计量吸入器给药的全身暴露情况。对连续采样的血浆肾上腺素和阿布特罗水平进行了测量,并在治疗组之间进行了比较。安全性通过在每次交叉给药检查中获得的不良事件、序列生命体征、心电图和临床实验室检测进行评估。结果剂量正常化后,吸入肾上腺素 MDI 的全身外源性药物暴露量(39 皮克/毫升 × 小时)比肾上腺素 IM(435 皮克/毫升 × 小时)低 9 倍,比阿布特罗 MDI(3453 皮克/毫升 × 小时)低 122 倍。肾上腺素 MDI 的 Cmax(345 皮克/毫升)约为肾上腺素 IM(816 皮克/毫升)和阿布特罗 MDI(681 皮克/毫升)的一半。肾上腺素 MDI 的血浆药物浓度迅速降至基线(0.6 小时),而肾上腺素 IM 需要 8 小时,阿布特罗 MDI 需要 24 小时以上。肾上腺素 MDI 和阿布特罗 MDI 会导致生命体征和心电图发生微小的、临床上不明显的变化,而肾上腺素 IM 会导致收缩压、心率和校正 QT 间期轻微的一过性升高。结论肾上腺素 MDI(Primatene MIST)的全身药物暴露(SDE)比肾上腺素 IM 低 9 倍,比阿布特罗 MDI 低 122 倍。吸入式肾上腺素较低的 SDE 也与令人放心的安全性结果相关,与 IM 肾上腺素相比,吸入式肾上腺素未发现明显的心血管不良反应。临床试验注册号:NCT04207840:NCT04207840。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信