Are the Reference Values for the Provocative Concentration of Methacholine Appropriate for Children?

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1089/jamp.2024.0012
Allan L Coates, Myrtha E Reyna, Cathy C Doyle, Mark W Nagel
{"title":"Are the Reference Values for the Provocative Concentration of Methacholine Appropriate for Children?","authors":"Allan L Coates, Myrtha E Reyna, Cathy C Doyle, Mark W Nagel","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2024.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Preliminary data in a randomly selected pediatric cohort study in 8-year-olds suggested a rate of positivity to a methacholine challenge test that was unexpectedly high, roughly 30%. The current recommendation for a negative methacholine test is a 20% decrease in the forced expiratory volume in one second at a dose greater than 400 μg. This was derived from studies in adults using the obsolete English Wright nebulizer. One explanation for the high incidence of positivity in the study in 8-year-olds could be that children deposit more methacholine on a μg/kg basis than adults, due to differences in their breathing patterns. The purpose of this study was to determine if pediatric breathing patterns could result in a higher dose of methacholine depositing in the lungs of children based on μg/kg body weight compared with adults. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An AeroEclipse Breath Actuated nebulizer delivered methacholine aerosol, generated from a 16 mg/mL solution, for one minute, using age-appropriate breathing patterns for a 70 kg adult and a 30 and 50 kg child produced by a breathing simulator. Predicted lung deposition was calculated from the collected dose of methacholine on a filter placed at the nebulizer outport, multiplied by the fraction of the aerosol mass contained in particles ≤5 μm. The dose of methacholine on the inspiratory filter was assayed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Particle size was measured using laser diffraction technology. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean (95% confidence intervals) predicted pulmonary dose of methacholine was 46.1 (45.4, 46.8), 48.6 (45.3, 51.9), and 36.1 (34.2, 37.9) μg/kg body weight for the 30 kg child, 50 kg child, and 70 kg adult, respectively. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> On a μg/kg body weight, the predicted pulmonary dose of methacholine was greater with the pediatric breathing patterns than with the adult pattern.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2024.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preliminary data in a randomly selected pediatric cohort study in 8-year-olds suggested a rate of positivity to a methacholine challenge test that was unexpectedly high, roughly 30%. The current recommendation for a negative methacholine test is a 20% decrease in the forced expiratory volume in one second at a dose greater than 400 μg. This was derived from studies in adults using the obsolete English Wright nebulizer. One explanation for the high incidence of positivity in the study in 8-year-olds could be that children deposit more methacholine on a μg/kg basis than adults, due to differences in their breathing patterns. The purpose of this study was to determine if pediatric breathing patterns could result in a higher dose of methacholine depositing in the lungs of children based on μg/kg body weight compared with adults. Methods: An AeroEclipse Breath Actuated nebulizer delivered methacholine aerosol, generated from a 16 mg/mL solution, for one minute, using age-appropriate breathing patterns for a 70 kg adult and a 30 and 50 kg child produced by a breathing simulator. Predicted lung deposition was calculated from the collected dose of methacholine on a filter placed at the nebulizer outport, multiplied by the fraction of the aerosol mass contained in particles ≤5 μm. The dose of methacholine on the inspiratory filter was assayed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Particle size was measured using laser diffraction technology. Results: The mean (95% confidence intervals) predicted pulmonary dose of methacholine was 46.1 (45.4, 46.8), 48.6 (45.3, 51.9), and 36.1 (34.2, 37.9) μg/kg body weight for the 30 kg child, 50 kg child, and 70 kg adult, respectively. Conclusions: On a μg/kg body weight, the predicted pulmonary dose of methacholine was greater with the pediatric breathing patterns than with the adult pattern.

甲氧胆碱诱发浓度的参考值是否适合儿童?
背景:一项随机抽取的 8 岁儿童队列研究的初步数据显示,甲基胆碱挑战试验的阳性率出乎意料地高,约为 30%。目前对甲氧胆碱试验阴性的建议是,剂量超过 400 微克时,一秒钟内用力呼气量减少 20%。这是从使用过时的英国莱特雾化器对成人进行的研究中得出的。在对 8 岁儿童的研究中,阳性率较高的一个原因可能是,由于呼吸模式的不同,儿童比成人沉积更多的甲基胆碱(以微克/千克为单位)。本研究的目的是确定小儿的呼吸模式是否会导致小儿肺中沉积的甲基胆碱剂量(以微克/千克体重计算)高于成人。研究方法使用 AeroEclipse 呼吸驱动雾化器,通过呼吸模拟器为体重 70 公斤的成人、体重 30 公斤和 50 公斤的儿童模拟适合其年龄的呼吸模式,在一分钟内输送由 16 毫克/毫升溶液产生的甲氧喹气溶胶。预测的肺部沉积量是根据放置在雾化器出口处的过滤器上收集到的甲基胆碱剂量乘以气溶胶质量中≤5 μm 的颗粒所占比例计算得出的。吸气过滤器上的甲基胆碱剂量由高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定。使用激光衍射技术测量颗粒大小。结果体重为 30 公斤的儿童、体重为 50 公斤的儿童和体重为 70 公斤的成人的平均(95% 置信区间)预测甲氧胆碱肺剂量分别为 46.1(45.4,46.8)、48.6(45.3,51.9)和 36.1(34.2,37.9)微克/公斤体重。结论以微克/千克体重为单位,小儿呼吸模式的预测甲氧胆碱肺剂量大于成人呼吸模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信