Insights on feline infectious peritonitis risk factors and sampling strategies from polymerase chain reaction analysis of feline coronavirus in large-scale nationwide submissions.

IF 1.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Subarna Barua, Shila Sarkar, Kelly Chenoweth, Calvin Johnson, Diane Delmain, Chengming Wang
{"title":"Insights on feline infectious peritonitis risk factors and sampling strategies from polymerase chain reaction analysis of feline coronavirus in large-scale nationwide submissions.","authors":"Subarna Barua, Shila Sarkar, Kelly Chenoweth, Calvin Johnson, Diane Delmain, Chengming Wang","doi":"10.2460/javma.24.03.0208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This nationwide study aimed to investigate risk factors associated with FIP and determine optimal sample submission strategies for its diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 14,035 clinical samples from cats across the US were analyzed by means of reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR to detect replicating feline coronavirus (FCoV). χ2 and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between FCoV detection rates and risk factors such as age, gender, breed, and types of submitted samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher FCoV detection rates were observed in younger cats, particularly those aged 0 to 1 year, and in male cats. Purebred cats, notably British Shorthairs [OR: 2.81; P < .001], showed a higher incidence of FCoV infection than other cats. Peritoneal fluid (OR, 7.51; P < .001) exhibited higher FCoV detection rates than other samples, while lower rates were seen in blood samples (OR, 0.08; P < .001) than in other samples. High FCoV detection rates were found in urine, kidney, and lymph node samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study identified significant risk factors associated with FIP. Optimal sample submission strategies, particularly emphasizing the use of peritoneal fluid, kidney, and lymph node, were identified to improve FIP detection rates. Urine yielded a relatively high frequency of infection and viral loads compared with most other samples.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Understanding the risk factors and optimizing sample selection for FIP diagnosis can aid in the early detection and management of the disease, ultimately improving outcomes for affected cats. These findings contribute valuable insights to FIP epidemiology and underscore the importance of continued research to enhance diagnostic strategies and disease management approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.24.03.0208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This nationwide study aimed to investigate risk factors associated with FIP and determine optimal sample submission strategies for its diagnosis.

Methods: A total of 14,035 clinical samples from cats across the US were analyzed by means of reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR to detect replicating feline coronavirus (FCoV). χ2 and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between FCoV detection rates and risk factors such as age, gender, breed, and types of submitted samples.

Results: Higher FCoV detection rates were observed in younger cats, particularly those aged 0 to 1 year, and in male cats. Purebred cats, notably British Shorthairs [OR: 2.81; P < .001], showed a higher incidence of FCoV infection than other cats. Peritoneal fluid (OR, 7.51; P < .001) exhibited higher FCoV detection rates than other samples, while lower rates were seen in blood samples (OR, 0.08; P < .001) than in other samples. High FCoV detection rates were found in urine, kidney, and lymph node samples.

Conclusions: The study identified significant risk factors associated with FIP. Optimal sample submission strategies, particularly emphasizing the use of peritoneal fluid, kidney, and lymph node, were identified to improve FIP detection rates. Urine yielded a relatively high frequency of infection and viral loads compared with most other samples.

Clinical relevance: Understanding the risk factors and optimizing sample selection for FIP diagnosis can aid in the early detection and management of the disease, ultimately improving outcomes for affected cats. These findings contribute valuable insights to FIP epidemiology and underscore the importance of continued research to enhance diagnostic strategies and disease management approaches.

从全国范围大规模提交的猫冠状病毒聚合酶链反应分析中了解猫传染性腹膜炎的风险因素和采样策略。
目的这项全国性研究旨在调查与 FIP 相关的风险因素,并确定诊断 FIP 的最佳样本提交策略:采用逆转录酶定量 PCR 分析了全美 14,035 份猫的临床样本,以检测复制的猫冠状病毒 (FCoV):幼猫(尤其是 0 至 1 岁的猫)和公猫的 FCoV 检出率较高。纯种猫,尤其是英国短毛猫[OR:2.81;P < .001]的 FCoV 感染率高于其他猫。腹腔液(OR:7.51;P < .001)的 FCoV 检出率高于其他样本,而血液样本(OR:0.08;P < .001)的检出率低于其他样本。尿液、肾脏和淋巴结样本的 FCoV 检出率较高:研究发现了与 FIP 相关的重要风险因素。结论:该研究发现了与 FIP 相关的重要风险因素,并确定了最佳样本送检策略,尤其强调腹腔液、肾脏和淋巴结样本的使用,以提高 FIP 的检出率。与大多数其他样本相比,尿液的感染频率和病毒载量相对较高:临床意义:了解 FIP 诊断的风险因素并优化样本选择有助于疾病的早期发现和管理,最终改善患病猫咪的预后。这些发现为 FIP 流行病学提供了宝贵的见解,并强调了继续研究以加强诊断策略和疾病管理方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信