Safety and Postoperative Outcomes of Transoral Surgery for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma in Older Adults.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Andrea Costantino, Bruce Haughey, Uthman Alamoudi, Mathew Biskup, Jeffery Scott Magnuson
{"title":"Safety and Postoperative Outcomes of Transoral Surgery for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma in Older Adults.","authors":"Andrea Costantino, Bruce Haughey, Uthman Alamoudi, Mathew Biskup, Jeffery Scott Magnuson","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Transoral surgery (TOS) has become the primary surgical treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). However, despite the increasing incidence of OPSCC in older patients, data regarding the safety and postoperative outcomes of TOS in this subgroup are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety and postoperative outcomes of TOS in patients with OPSCC aged 70 years or older compared with younger individuals.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients with microscopic diagnostic confirmation of invasive OPSCC diagnosed between 2010 and 2021. Data were obtained from the US National Cancer Database. Data were analyzed in March 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Minimally invasive TOS not converted to an open approach.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were constructed to compare postoperative outcomes, adjusting for baseline patient and tumor characteristics. The results are reported as odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences with corresponding 95% CI, as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 430 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [9.6] years; 8744 [83.8%] male) were included, with 1808 patients (17.3%) aged at least 70 years. No clinically meaningful difference was observed in terms of postoperative mortality at 30 days (adjusted OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65-2.33) or 90 days (adjusted OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.65-1.87). Patients aged 70 years or older were less likely to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.83) and chemotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.77). In addition, the adjuvant treatment was more frequently not administered in the older population due to patient refusal or comorbidities, despite being clinically indicated (radiotherapy: adjusted OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05-1.77; chemotherapy: adjusted OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.17-2.45). No meaningful differences were observed regarding the remaining study outcomes, apart from a slightly longer hospitalization time for older patients, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.39 (95% CI, 0.05-0.74) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Findings from this study suggest that age was not independently associated with postoperative mortality in older patients undergoing TOS for OPSCC. However, older patients less frequently received adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared with younger patients, and future studies should be conducted to examine the impact on long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":" ","pages":"879-886"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2596","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Transoral surgery (TOS) has become the primary surgical treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). However, despite the increasing incidence of OPSCC in older patients, data regarding the safety and postoperative outcomes of TOS in this subgroup are lacking.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and postoperative outcomes of TOS in patients with OPSCC aged 70 years or older compared with younger individuals.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients with microscopic diagnostic confirmation of invasive OPSCC diagnosed between 2010 and 2021. Data were obtained from the US National Cancer Database. Data were analyzed in March 2024.

Exposure: Minimally invasive TOS not converted to an open approach.

Main outcomes and measures: Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were constructed to compare postoperative outcomes, adjusting for baseline patient and tumor characteristics. The results are reported as odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences with corresponding 95% CI, as appropriate.

Results: A total of 10 430 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [9.6] years; 8744 [83.8%] male) were included, with 1808 patients (17.3%) aged at least 70 years. No clinically meaningful difference was observed in terms of postoperative mortality at 30 days (adjusted OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65-2.33) or 90 days (adjusted OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.65-1.87). Patients aged 70 years or older were less likely to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.83) and chemotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.77). In addition, the adjuvant treatment was more frequently not administered in the older population due to patient refusal or comorbidities, despite being clinically indicated (radiotherapy: adjusted OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05-1.77; chemotherapy: adjusted OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.17-2.45). No meaningful differences were observed regarding the remaining study outcomes, apart from a slightly longer hospitalization time for older patients, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.39 (95% CI, 0.05-0.74) days.

Conclusions and relevance: Findings from this study suggest that age was not independently associated with postoperative mortality in older patients undergoing TOS for OPSCC. However, older patients less frequently received adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared with younger patients, and future studies should be conducted to examine the impact on long-term survival.

经口手术治疗老年人口咽癌的安全性和术后效果。
重要性:经口手术(TOS)已成为口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)的主要外科治疗方法。然而,尽管老年患者口咽鳞癌的发病率越来越高,但有关该亚组患者接受经口手术治疗的安全性和术后效果的数据却很缺乏:本研究旨在评估与年轻人相比,70 岁或以上 OPSCC 患者接受 TOS 的安全性和术后效果:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2010 年至 2021 年间经显微镜诊断确认为侵袭性 OPSCC 的患者。数据来自美国国家癌症数据库。数据分析时间为2024年3月。暴露:未转为开放式方法的微创TOS:建立多变量逻辑和线性回归模型来比较术后结果,并对基线患者和肿瘤特征进行调整。结果酌情以几率比(ORs)或平均差异及相应的 95% CI 报告:共纳入 10 430 名患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 60.7 [9.6] 岁;8744 [83.8%] 名男性),其中 1808 名患者(17.3%)的年龄至少为 70 岁。在术后 30 天(调整后 OR,1.24;95% CI,0.65-2.33)或 90 天(调整后 OR,1.11;95% CI,0.65-1.87)死亡率方面,未观察到有临床意义的差异。70岁或以上的患者接受辅助放疗(调整后OR值为0.69;95% CI为0.57-0.83)和化疗(调整后OR值为0.63;95% CI为0.51-0.77)的可能性较低。此外,在老年人群中,尽管有临床指征,但由于患者拒绝或合并症而未进行辅助治疗的情况更为常见(放疗:调整后OR值为1.36;95% CI为1.05-1.77;化疗:调整后OR值为1.70;95% CI为1.17-2.45)。除了年龄较大的患者住院时间稍长(调整后的平均差异为 0.39 天(95% CI,0.05-0.74))外,其余研究结果均未观察到有意义的差异:本研究结果表明,年龄与接受TOS治疗的老年OPSCC患者的术后死亡率无关。不过,与年轻患者相比,老年患者接受辅助放疗和化疗的频率较低,因此今后应开展研究,探讨其对长期生存的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信