Radiotherapy vs Surgery for Survival and Locoregional Control of Head and Neck Extramedullary Plasmacytoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Srivatsa Surya Vasudevan, Sabry Babiker Hassan Sayed, Pratiksha Kapartiwar, John Pang, Ameya A Asarkar, Lindsay Olinde, Sanford Katz, Kavitha Beedupalli, Cherie-Ann O Nathan
{"title":"Radiotherapy vs Surgery for Survival and Locoregional Control of Head and Neck Extramedullary Plasmacytoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Srivatsa Surya Vasudevan, Sabry Babiker Hassan Sayed, Pratiksha Kapartiwar, John Pang, Ameya A Asarkar, Lindsay Olinde, Sanford Katz, Kavitha Beedupalli, Cherie-Ann O Nathan","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There are significant gaps in the literature pertaining to the locoregional control and survival rates of extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) with respect to various treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the differences in radiotherapy and surgical outcomes in EMP.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ScienceDirect were systematically searched from their inception up to November 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Articles reporting radiotherapy and surgical outcomes of head and neck EMP were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>A random-effects model for meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled estimates and calculate hazard ratios for survival and odds ratios for recurrence and progression of EMP.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Survival, tumor control, and progression rates to multiple myeloma (MM) between radiation therapy and surgery for EMP of the head and neck.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 742 included patients from 12 studies, 527 (71.0%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 59.1 (53-62) years. A total of 505 patients (68.1%) received radiotherapy only, while 237 (31.9%) underwent surgery-only treatment for EMP. All included patients had an initial diagnosis of EMP without MM. Comparable trends were observed in overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 2, 3, 5, and 10 years between patients with EMP treated with radiotherapy only and surgery only. Notably, there were no significant differences in recurrence rate (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.20-2.06) between radiotherapy-only and surgery-only treatment. However, radiotherapy-only treatment of EMP was associated with decreased odds of progression to MM compared with surgery (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.1-0.9). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the radiotherapy-only population had significantly better 5-year DFS (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.96) compared with surgery-only treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that patients with EMP receiving radiotherapy had significantly lower chances of progression to MM compared with surgery-only therapy. Additionally, radiotherapy had better 5-year DFS outcomes compared with surgery. Comparable outcomes in terms of overall survival rates, recurrence, and mortality rates were noted between radiotherapy-only and surgery-only EMP treatment groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":" ","pages":"887-895"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2597","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: There are significant gaps in the literature pertaining to the locoregional control and survival rates of extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) with respect to various treatment approaches.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the differences in radiotherapy and surgical outcomes in EMP.

Data sources: Databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ScienceDirect were systematically searched from their inception up to November 2023.

Study selection: Articles reporting radiotherapy and surgical outcomes of head and neck EMP were included.

Data extraction and synthesis: A random-effects model for meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled estimates and calculate hazard ratios for survival and odds ratios for recurrence and progression of EMP.

Main outcomes and measures: Survival, tumor control, and progression rates to multiple myeloma (MM) between radiation therapy and surgery for EMP of the head and neck.

Results: Of 742 included patients from 12 studies, 527 (71.0%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 59.1 (53-62) years. A total of 505 patients (68.1%) received radiotherapy only, while 237 (31.9%) underwent surgery-only treatment for EMP. All included patients had an initial diagnosis of EMP without MM. Comparable trends were observed in overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 2, 3, 5, and 10 years between patients with EMP treated with radiotherapy only and surgery only. Notably, there were no significant differences in recurrence rate (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.20-2.06) between radiotherapy-only and surgery-only treatment. However, radiotherapy-only treatment of EMP was associated with decreased odds of progression to MM compared with surgery (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.1-0.9). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the radiotherapy-only population had significantly better 5-year DFS (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.96) compared with surgery-only treatment.

Conclusions and relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that patients with EMP receiving radiotherapy had significantly lower chances of progression to MM compared with surgery-only therapy. Additionally, radiotherapy had better 5-year DFS outcomes compared with surgery. Comparable outcomes in terms of overall survival rates, recurrence, and mortality rates were noted between radiotherapy-only and surgery-only EMP treatment groups.

放疗与手术对头颈部髓外浆细胞瘤存活率和局部控制的影响:系统回顾和元分析。
重要性:有关髓外浆细胞瘤(EMP)各种治疗方法的局部控制和生存率的文献存在很大差距:系统评估EMP放疗和手术治疗效果的差异:数据来源:系统检索了PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase和ScienceDirect等数据库从开始到2023年11月的数据:研究选择:纳入报道头颈部EMP放疗和手术结果的文章:采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以获得集合估计值,并计算EMP生存期的危险比以及复发和进展的几率:主要结果和测量指标:头颈部EMP放疗和手术治疗的生存率、肿瘤控制率和多发性骨髓瘤(MM)进展率:在12项研究纳入的742例患者中,527例(71.0%)为男性,中位(IQR)年龄为59.1(53-62)岁。共有 505 名患者(68.1%)只接受了放射治疗,237 名患者(31.9%)只接受了 EMP 手术治疗。所有纳入患者的初步诊断均为EMP而非MM。仅接受放疗和仅接受手术治疗的EMP患者在2年、3年、5年和10年的总生存率和无病生存率(DFS)方面呈现出相似的趋势。值得注意的是,单纯放疗和单纯手术治疗的复发率(几率比,0.65;95% CI,0.20-2.06)没有明显差异。不过,与手术相比,单纯放疗治疗EMP与进展为MM的几率降低有关(几率比为0.4;95% CI为0.1-0.9)。敏感性分析显示,与单纯手术治疗相比,单纯放疗人群的5年DFS明显更好(危险比为0.55;95% CI为0.31-0.96):这项系统综述和荟萃分析提供的证据表明,与单纯手术治疗相比,接受放疗的EMP患者进展为MM的几率明显降低。此外,与手术相比,放疗的 5 年 DFS 结果更好。单纯放疗组和单纯手术 EMP 治疗组在总生存率、复发率和死亡率方面的结果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信