Effect of sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer compared to single cleavage stage embryo transfer on assisted reproductive technology outcome: An RCT.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-08-05 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.18502/ijrm.v22i6.16793
Nahid Homayoon, Sahereh Arabian, Esmat Mangoli, Fatemeh Bayati, Maryam Eftekhar
{"title":"Effect of sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer compared to single cleavage stage embryo transfer on assisted reproductive technology outcome: An RCT.","authors":"Nahid Homayoon, Sahereh Arabian, Esmat Mangoli, Fatemeh Bayati, Maryam Eftekhar","doi":"10.18502/ijrm.v22i6.16793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assisted reproductive technology (ART), offers hope for many infertile couples by increasing the chance of successful pregnancy. The success of in vitro fertilization depends on various factors, in which embryo transfer (ET) is one of the critical steps influencing in vitro fertilization success rates. Extended embryo culture and blastocyst-stage ET have been considered in ART due to their potential benefits including improved implantation rates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the outcomes of sequential ET vs single cleavage-stage ET in women undergoing a fresh ET cycle with a limited number of embryos.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 140 women undergoing infertility treatments and candidates for fresh ET at the Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd, Iran from August 2023 to January 2024. Women with a number of embryos from 2-5 ( <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 2 and <math><mo>≤</mo></math> 5 available embryos) were randomly divided into 2 groups: One group underwent sequential ET (one cleavage-stage ET followed by one blastocyst ET) and the other group underwent single-step 2 cleavage-stage ET. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy, and the secondary outcome included chemical pregnancy and early abortion rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings showed significantly higher rates of clinical (33.5% vs 13.6%, p = 0.003) and chemical (41.3% vs 18.2%, p = 0.004) pregnancies in the sequential ET group compared to the single-step cleavage ET group. The early abortion rate was higher in single-step cleavage ET (13% vs 44.4%, p = 0.053).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sequential fresh ET is a useful choice in women who have a limited number of embryos and can improve ART outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14386,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","volume":"22 6","pages":"433-440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v22i6.16793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assisted reproductive technology (ART), offers hope for many infertile couples by increasing the chance of successful pregnancy. The success of in vitro fertilization depends on various factors, in which embryo transfer (ET) is one of the critical steps influencing in vitro fertilization success rates. Extended embryo culture and blastocyst-stage ET have been considered in ART due to their potential benefits including improved implantation rates.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of sequential ET vs single cleavage-stage ET in women undergoing a fresh ET cycle with a limited number of embryos.

Materials and methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 140 women undergoing infertility treatments and candidates for fresh ET at the Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd, Iran from August 2023 to January 2024. Women with a number of embryos from 2-5 ( 2 and 5 available embryos) were randomly divided into 2 groups: One group underwent sequential ET (one cleavage-stage ET followed by one blastocyst ET) and the other group underwent single-step 2 cleavage-stage ET. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy, and the secondary outcome included chemical pregnancy and early abortion rates.

Results: Our findings showed significantly higher rates of clinical (33.5% vs 13.6%, p = 0.003) and chemical (41.3% vs 18.2%, p = 0.004) pregnancies in the sequential ET group compared to the single-step cleavage ET group. The early abortion rate was higher in single-step cleavage ET (13% vs 44.4%, p = 0.053).

Conclusion: Sequential fresh ET is a useful choice in women who have a limited number of embryos and can improve ART outcomes.

与单个分裂期胚胎移植相比,顺序分裂和囊胚移植对辅助生殖技术结果的影响:一项 RCT。
背景:辅助生殖技术(ART)为许多不孕夫妇带来了成功怀孕的希望。体外受精的成功取决于多种因素,其中胚胎移植(ET)是影响体外受精成功率的关键步骤之一。延长胚胎培养和囊胚期胚胎移植因其潜在的益处(包括提高植入率)已被纳入 ART 的考虑范围:本研究旨在比较对胚胎数量有限的女性进行新鲜 ET 周期的顺序 ET 与单一卵裂期 ET 的结果:这项随机临床试验于2023年8月至2024年1月在伊朗亚兹德的不孕不育研究与临床中心进行,对象是140名正在接受不孕不育治疗并准备进行新鲜ET的女性。胚胎数为 2-5 个(可用胚胎数≥ 2 个和≤ 5 个)的妇女被随机分为两组:一组进行顺序 ET(一次卵裂期 ET 后进行一次囊胚 ET),另一组进行单步 2 卵裂期 ET。主要结果是临床妊娠,次要结果包括化学妊娠率和早期流产率:结果:我们的研究结果显示,与单步卵裂ET组相比,序贯ET组的临床妊娠率(33.5% vs 13.6%,P = 0.003)和化学妊娠率(41.3% vs 18.2%,P = 0.004)明显更高。单步清宫 ET 的早期流产率更高(13% vs 44.4%,p = 0.053):结论:对于胚胎数量有限的妇女来说,顺序新鲜 ET 是一种有用的选择,可以改善 ART 的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM), formerly published as "Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine (ISSN: 1680-6433)", is an international monthly scientific journal for who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. This journal accepts Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Photo Clinics, and Letters to the Editor in the fields of fertility and infertility, ethical and social issues of assisted reproductive technologies, cellular and molecular biology of reproduction including the development of gametes and early embryos, assisted reproductive technologies in model system and in a clinical environment, reproductive endocrinology, andrology, epidemiology, pathology, genetics, oncology, surgery, psychology, and physiology. Emerging topics including cloning and stem cells are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信