Female genital mutilation/cutting in women delivering in France: An observational national study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15880
Hélène Cinelli, Nathalie Lelong, Marie Lesclingand, Sophie Alexander, Béatrice Blondel, Camille Le Ray
{"title":"Female genital mutilation/cutting in women delivering in France: An observational national study.","authors":"Hélène Cinelli, Nathalie Lelong, Marie Lesclingand, Sophie Alexander, Béatrice Blondel, Camille Le Ray","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>International migration from source countries has meant that clinicians in high income countries, that is, receiving countries, are increasingly caring for affected women affected by female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of FGM/C among women at childbirth, and its association with pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational study using data from a cross-sectional population-based study from the French National Perinatal Survey of 2021 (ENP) conducted in all maternity units in mainland France and including all women delivering a live birth during 1 week in March 2021 (N = 10 928). We estimated the FGM/C prevalence using (i) the diagnosed cases and (ii) the indirect prevalence estimated by UNICEF in each source country. We compared population characteristics and perinatal outcomes between women diagnosed with FGM/C and two groups: (i) women originating in source countries and diagnosed as without FGM/C and (ii) all women without diagnosis of FGM/C whatever the country of birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnosed prevalence of FGM/C was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.78-1.14] and the indirect computed estimation prevalence was estimated at 1.53% (95% CI: 1.31-1.77) in 113 and 183 women, respectively. Labor and delivery outcomes were globally similar in women with FGM/C and the other two groups. Only episiotomy was more frequently performed in women with FGM/C than in the other two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In receiving countries, obstetric outcomes of women with FGM/C can be similar to those of other women, which does not preclude need of further research and training to provide the most appropriate care, including enhanced attention to diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":"693-700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: International migration from source countries has meant that clinicians in high income countries, that is, receiving countries, are increasingly caring for affected women affected by female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of FGM/C among women at childbirth, and its association with pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: This was an observational study using data from a cross-sectional population-based study from the French National Perinatal Survey of 2021 (ENP) conducted in all maternity units in mainland France and including all women delivering a live birth during 1 week in March 2021 (N = 10 928). We estimated the FGM/C prevalence using (i) the diagnosed cases and (ii) the indirect prevalence estimated by UNICEF in each source country. We compared population characteristics and perinatal outcomes between women diagnosed with FGM/C and two groups: (i) women originating in source countries and diagnosed as without FGM/C and (ii) all women without diagnosis of FGM/C whatever the country of birth.

Results: Diagnosed prevalence of FGM/C was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.78-1.14] and the indirect computed estimation prevalence was estimated at 1.53% (95% CI: 1.31-1.77) in 113 and 183 women, respectively. Labor and delivery outcomes were globally similar in women with FGM/C and the other two groups. Only episiotomy was more frequently performed in women with FGM/C than in the other two groups.

Conclusion: In receiving countries, obstetric outcomes of women with FGM/C can be similar to those of other women, which does not preclude need of further research and training to provide the most appropriate care, including enhanced attention to diagnosis.

法国产妇切割女性生殖器的情况:一项全国性观察研究。
目的:来自来源国的国际移民意味着高收入国家(即接受国)的临床医生越来越多地照顾受切割女性生殖器官(FGM/C)影响的妇女。本研究旨在评估女性外阴残割/切割在分娩妇女中的发生率及其与妊娠结果的关系:本研究是一项观察性研究,使用的数据来自法国 2021 年全国围产期调查(ENP)的横断面人群研究,该调查在法国本土的所有产科医院进行,包括 2021 年 3 月 1 周内分娩的所有活产产妇(N = 10 928)。我们使用(i)确诊病例和(ii)联合国儿童基金会在每个来源国估计的间接流行率来估算切割女性生殖器的流行率。我们比较了被诊断为切割女性生殖器的妇女和以下两组妇女的人口特征和围产期结果:(i) 来源于来源国并被诊断为未切割女性生殖器的妇女;(ii) 所有未被诊断为切割女性生殖器的妇女,无论其出生国如何:在 113 名和 183 名妇女中,切割女性生殖器的确诊率为 95%(95% CI:0.78-1.14],间接计算的估计率为 1.53%(95% CI:1.31-1.77)。切割女性生殖器的产妇与其他两组产妇的分娩结果基本相似。只有切割女性生殖器的产妇比其他两组产妇更常进行外阴切开术:在接受国,切割女性生殖器妇女的产科结果可能与其他妇女相似,这并不排除需要进一步研究和培训,以提供最适当的护理,包括加强对诊断的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信