Development and evaluation of a novel user-operated slider-based audiometry method.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Chris Bang Sørensen, Adrian Bardhi, Ellen Raben Pedersen, Jesper Hvass Schmidt, Christos Sidiras, Jacob Nielsen
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a novel user-operated slider-based audiometry method.","authors":"Chris Bang Sørensen, Adrian Bardhi, Ellen Raben Pedersen, Jesper Hvass Schmidt, Christos Sidiras, Jacob Nielsen","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2396523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate a novel user-operated audiometry method allowing users full control in determining their pure-tone hearing thresholds.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Comparative study. Participants were recruited from a hearing clinic after undergoing manual audiometry (six frequencies). They then performed test-retests of a new test (slider audiometry, eight frequencies) and completed the System Usability Scale questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>37 adult participants, including 30 hearing-impaired and seven normal-hearing individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean (SD) threshold differences for octave frequencies between 250 to 2000 Hz between manual and slider audiometry ranged from -7.8 (6.6) to -5.7 (6.5) dB and were significant. For 4000 and 8000 Hz mean differences were -0.3 (8.4) and 0.0 (9.7) dB and insignificant. Standard deviations ranged from 6.5 to 9.7 dB across six tested frequencies. Slider test-retest mean threshold differences ranged from -1.4 (4.7) to 0.3 (6.0) dB across eight tested frequencies, with standard deviations ranging from 4.1 to 8.5 dB. The average usability score for the slider audiometry was 88.3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When compared to manual audiometry, the slider audiometry demonstrated validity at 4000 and 8000 Hz but found significantly lower thresholds for octave frequencies between 250 to 2000 Hz. Test-retests of the new method revealed small mean differences and acceptable SDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2396523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a novel user-operated audiometry method allowing users full control in determining their pure-tone hearing thresholds.

Design: Comparative study. Participants were recruited from a hearing clinic after undergoing manual audiometry (six frequencies). They then performed test-retests of a new test (slider audiometry, eight frequencies) and completed the System Usability Scale questionnaire.

Study sample: 37 adult participants, including 30 hearing-impaired and seven normal-hearing individuals.

Results: Mean (SD) threshold differences for octave frequencies between 250 to 2000 Hz between manual and slider audiometry ranged from -7.8 (6.6) to -5.7 (6.5) dB and were significant. For 4000 and 8000 Hz mean differences were -0.3 (8.4) and 0.0 (9.7) dB and insignificant. Standard deviations ranged from 6.5 to 9.7 dB across six tested frequencies. Slider test-retest mean threshold differences ranged from -1.4 (4.7) to 0.3 (6.0) dB across eight tested frequencies, with standard deviations ranging from 4.1 to 8.5 dB. The average usability score for the slider audiometry was 88.3.

Conclusion: When compared to manual audiometry, the slider audiometry demonstrated validity at 4000 and 8000 Hz but found significantly lower thresholds for octave frequencies between 250 to 2000 Hz. Test-retests of the new method revealed small mean differences and acceptable SDs.

开发和评估基于用户操作滑块的新型测听方法。
目的评估一种新型用户操作测听方法,该方法允许用户完全控制纯音听阈的测定:设计:比较研究。参与者在听力诊所接受人工测听(6 个频率)后被招募。研究样本:37 名成年参与者,其中包括 30 名听力受损者:研究样本:37 名成年参与者,包括 30 名听力受损者和 7 名听力正常者:手动测听与滑块测听在 250 至 2000 Hz 之间的倍频程阈值平均(标清)差异为 -7.8 (6.6) 至 -5.7 (6.5) dB,且差异显著。4000 和 8000 Hz 的平均差异为-0.3 (8.4) 和 0.0 (9.7) dB,差异不明显。六个测试频率的标准偏差在 6.5 到 9.7 分贝之间。在 8 个测试频率中,滑块测试-重测平均阈值差异范围为-1.4 (4.7) 到 0.3 (6.0) dB,标准偏差范围为 4.1 到 8.5 dB。滑块测听的平均可用性得分为 88.3.结论:结论:与人工测听法相比,滑块测听法在 4000 和 8000 Hz 频率下有效,但在 250 至 2000 Hz 之间的倍频程频率下阈值明显较低。新方法的重复测试显示,平均差较小,SD 值可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信