Functional and radiological sinonasal outcomes of CFTR modulators for sinus disease in cystic fibrosis: A meta-analysis

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Tristan Tham MD, Felisha A. Li BA, Jacob R. Schneider BS, Matthew I. Saleem MD, Michael T. Werner MD, PhD, Mark B. Chaskes MD, Charles C. L. Tong MD, Judd H. Fastenberg MD
{"title":"Functional and radiological sinonasal outcomes of CFTR modulators for sinus disease in cystic fibrosis: A meta-analysis","authors":"Tristan Tham MD,&nbsp;Felisha A. Li BA,&nbsp;Jacob R. Schneider BS,&nbsp;Matthew I. Saleem MD,&nbsp;Michael T. Werner MD, PhD,&nbsp;Mark B. Chaskes MD,&nbsp;Charles C. L. Tong MD,&nbsp;Judd H. Fastenberg MD","doi":"10.1002/alr.23439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators improve pulmonary outcomes in cystic fibrosis (CF) by stabilizing the CFTR protein on respiratory epithelial surfaces. To determine the efficacy of CFTR modulators on sinonasal outcomes in patients with CF, we performed a meta-analysis of clinical trials to date that include functional and radiographic evidence of sinus disease.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>English full-text articles were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Two reviewers screened articles and a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Articles were included if they reported functional or radiological sinonasal outcomes in patients with CF before and after CFTR modulator therapies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed, and the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions tool was used for quality assessment. The generic inverse variance method with random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and mean difference (MD) were used as effect measurements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seven prospective and two retrospective studies representing 248 patients were included in this analysis. There was a significant improvement in sinonasal outcome test-22 scores on elexacaftor‒tezacaftor‒ivacaftor (MD = 12.80, [95% confidence interval, CI: 10.46‒15.13], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>n</i> = 222), with no heterogeneity detected (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.820). There was also a significant improvement in Lund‒Mackay scores (SMD = 1.25, [95% CI: 0.58‒1.91], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>n</i> = 88), with heterogeneity detected (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 67%, <i>p</i> = 0.030).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CFTR modulators improve functional and radiologic sinonasal outcomes. Given the utility of CFTR modulators, the treatment paradigm for CF-related chronic rhinosinusitis promises to evolve.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":"14 10","pages":"1607-1617"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.23439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators improve pulmonary outcomes in cystic fibrosis (CF) by stabilizing the CFTR protein on respiratory epithelial surfaces. To determine the efficacy of CFTR modulators on sinonasal outcomes in patients with CF, we performed a meta-analysis of clinical trials to date that include functional and radiographic evidence of sinus disease.

Methods

English full-text articles were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Two reviewers screened articles and a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Articles were included if they reported functional or radiological sinonasal outcomes in patients with CF before and after CFTR modulator therapies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed, and the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions tool was used for quality assessment. The generic inverse variance method with random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and mean difference (MD) were used as effect measurements.

Results

Seven prospective and two retrospective studies representing 248 patients were included in this analysis. There was a significant improvement in sinonasal outcome test-22 scores on elexacaftor‒tezacaftor‒ivacaftor (MD = 12.80, [95% confidence interval, CI: 10.46‒15.13], p < 0.001, n = 222), with no heterogeneity detected (I2 = 0%, p = 0.820). There was also a significant improvement in Lund‒Mackay scores (SMD = 1.25, [95% CI: 0.58‒1.91], p < 0.001, n = 88), with heterogeneity detected (I2 = 67%, p = 0.030).

Conclusions

CFTR modulators improve functional and radiologic sinonasal outcomes. Given the utility of CFTR modulators, the treatment paradigm for CF-related chronic rhinosinusitis promises to evolve.

CFTR调节剂治疗囊性纤维化鼻窦疾病的功能和鼻窦放射学结果:荟萃分析
背景:囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节剂(CFTR)调节剂通过稳定呼吸道上皮细胞表面的CFTR蛋白,改善囊性纤维化(CF)患者的肺部预后。为了确定CFTR调节剂对CF患者鼻窦疾病的疗效,我们对迄今为止包含鼻窦疾病功能和影像学证据的临床试验进行了荟萃分析:在 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库中检索英文全文文章。两名审稿人对文章进行筛选,第三名审稿人负责解决分歧。如果文章报道了CFTR调节剂治疗前后CF患者鼻窦的功能性或放射学结果,则将其纳入研究。研究遵循《系统综述和Meta分析首选报告项目》指南,并使用非随机干预研究偏倚风险工具进行质量评估。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型的通用逆方差法。采用标准化平均差(SMD)和平均差(MD)作为效应测量指标:本次分析共纳入了七项前瞻性研究和两项回顾性研究,代表了 248 名患者。elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor 的鼻窦结果测试-22 评分有明显改善(MD = 12.80,[95% 置信区间,CI:10.46-15.13],P 2 = 0%,P = 0.820)。Lund-Mackay 评分也有明显改善(SMD = 1.25,[95% CI:0.58-1.91],P 2 = 67%,P = 0.030):结论:CFTR调节剂可改善鼻窦功能和放射学结果。鉴于 CFTR 调节剂的效用,CF 相关慢性鼻炎的治疗模式有望得到发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信