Clinical outcomes, management, healthcare resource utilization, and cost according to the CHA2DS2-VASc scores in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Keye Fan, Yue Xiao, Aoming Xue, Jifang Zhou
{"title":"Clinical outcomes, management, healthcare resource utilization, and cost according to the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scores in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Keye Fan, Yue Xiao, Aoming Xue, Jifang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with different CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scores in the contemporary Asian population remains unclear. Additionally, there is a lack of research examining the disparities in management patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and cost among these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This retrospective cohort study assessed patients diagnosed with NVAF between January 2018 and July 2022. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts by CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scores: low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk. One-year incidence rates and cumulative incidence of clinical outcomes (including ischemic stroke [IS], transient ischemic attack [TIA], arterial embolism [AE], and major bleeding [MB]) were calculated. Management patterns, HCRU, and cost were analyzed descriptively. Among 419,490 NVAF patients (mean age: 75.2 years, 45.1 % female), 16,541 (3.9 %) were classified as low-risk, 38,494 (9.2 %) as intermediate-risk, and 364,455 (86.9 %) as high-risk. The one-year incidence rates for IS, TIA, AE, and MB were 12.4 (95 % CI, 12.3-12.5), 1.1 (95 % CI, 1.0-1.1), 0.5 (95 % CI, 0.5-0.5), and 3.1 per 100 person-years (95 % CI, 3.1-3.2), with an increasing trend from the low-risk to the high-risk group, respectively. During follow-up, 16.4 % and 11.1 % of patients in the low-risk and high-risk cohorts received oral anticoagulants (OACs), respectively. In addition, significant differences in HCRU and cost were observed in these three cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that contemporary Asian NVAF patients with higher CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scores experience higher incidence of adverse outcomes and increased hospital resource consumption. Additionally, suboptimal management was present across all CHA2DS2-VASc score groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prognosis among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores in the contemporary Asian population remains unclear. Additionally, there is a lack of research examining the disparities in management patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and cost among these patients.

Methods and results: This retrospective cohort study assessed patients diagnosed with NVAF between January 2018 and July 2022. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts by CHA2DS2-VASc scores: low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk. One-year incidence rates and cumulative incidence of clinical outcomes (including ischemic stroke [IS], transient ischemic attack [TIA], arterial embolism [AE], and major bleeding [MB]) were calculated. Management patterns, HCRU, and cost were analyzed descriptively. Among 419,490 NVAF patients (mean age: 75.2 years, 45.1 % female), 16,541 (3.9 %) were classified as low-risk, 38,494 (9.2 %) as intermediate-risk, and 364,455 (86.9 %) as high-risk. The one-year incidence rates for IS, TIA, AE, and MB were 12.4 (95 % CI, 12.3-12.5), 1.1 (95 % CI, 1.0-1.1), 0.5 (95 % CI, 0.5-0.5), and 3.1 per 100 person-years (95 % CI, 3.1-3.2), with an increasing trend from the low-risk to the high-risk group, respectively. During follow-up, 16.4 % and 11.1 % of patients in the low-risk and high-risk cohorts received oral anticoagulants (OACs), respectively. In addition, significant differences in HCRU and cost were observed in these three cohorts.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that contemporary Asian NVAF patients with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores experience higher incidence of adverse outcomes and increased hospital resource consumption. Additionally, suboptimal management was present across all CHA2DS2-VASc score groups.

根据 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分确定亚洲非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的临床结果、管理、医疗资源利用率和成本。
背景:当代亚洲人群中 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分不同的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者的预后仍不明确。此外,对这些患者在管理模式、医疗资源利用率(HCRU)和费用方面的差异也缺乏研究:这项回顾性队列研究评估了 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 7 月期间确诊的 NVAF 患者。根据 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分将患者分为 3 个队列:低风险、中风险和高风险。计算了一年的发病率和临床结局(包括缺血性中风 [IS]、短暂性脑缺血发作 [TIA]、动脉栓塞 [AE] 和大出血 [MB])的累积发病率。对管理模式、HCRU 和成本进行了描述性分析。在 419,490 名 NVAF 患者(平均年龄:75.2 岁,45.1% 为女性)中,16,541 人(3.9%)被归类为低风险,38,494 人(9.2%)被归类为中风险,364,455 人(86.9%)被归类为高风险。IS、TIA、AE 和 MB 的一年发病率分别为每 100 人年 12.4 例(95 % CI,12.3-12.5)、1.1 例(95 % CI,1.0-1.1)、0.5 例(95 % CI,0.5-0.5)和 3.1 例(95 % CI,3.1-3.2),从低风险组到高风险组分别呈上升趋势。在随访期间,低危组和高危组分别有16.4%和11.1%的患者接受了口服抗凝剂(OAC)治疗。此外,在这三个队列中还观察到了 HCRU 和费用方面的明显差异:本研究表明,CHA2DS2-VASc 评分较高的当代亚洲 NVAF 患者不良预后发生率较高,医院资源消耗增加。此外,在所有 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分组别中都存在管理不理想的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信