Predictive biomarkers of response to tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis (GCA): correlations with imaging activity.

Abstract

In the recent EULAR recommendations, ultrasound examination is now recommended as a first-line imaging test in all patients with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA) and the axillary arteries should be included in the standard exam. As an alternative to ultrasound evaluation, cranial and extracranial arteries can be examined using FDG-PET or MRI. The aim of our study was to observe in a retrospective case series whether there is a correlation between biomarkers and imaging activity in a population of patients followed in real life with GCA treated with prednisone (PDN) and tocilizumab (TCZ). We retrospectively enrolled 68 patients with newly diagnosed GCA between January 2020 and September 2021, followed in real life, who were examined at the Rheumatology Unit of the San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy. Patients were evaluated at T0-T3-T6-T12-T18-T24 for the following blood tests: ESR, CRP, fibrinogen, platelet count, serum amyloid A (SAA), IL-6, and circulating calprotectin (MRP). Ultrasound examination of the temporal arteries and axillary arteries was assessed at T0 within 7 days of starting treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids and subsequently at T3-T6-T12-T18-T24. A scale from 0 to 3 with semi-quantitative tools (SUV max) was assessed at T0-T12-T24. The evaluation of the correlation coefficient between laboratory and imaging variables has shown that SAA and MRP have the most powerful correlation with the PET score (0.523 and 0.64), and MRP also has an excellent correlation coefficient with the Halo score (0.658). The evaluation of the ROC curves shows for a PET score 3 and SAA values higher than 26 mg/L, sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 84.1%, and for a PET score 3 and MRP values higher than 2.3 mcg/mL, sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 76.8%. In this study, we demonstrated that SAA and MRP can be useful as promising tools to detect GCA activity. The study demonstrates a good correlation between the two biomarkers and the imaging activity evaluated by the Halo and PET scores.