The length of the biliopancreatic limb in one anastomosis gastric bypass.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1248744
Marc Focquet
{"title":"The length of the biliopancreatic limb in one anastomosis gastric bypass.","authors":"Marc Focquet","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1248744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), first published by Dr Rutledge in 1997 is now a well-established procedure in the bariatric-metabolic armamentarium. This procedure based on a (single) loop gastro-jejunal anastomosis (the biliopancreatic limb or BPL) with a long narrow gastric pouch combines restriction with hypo-absorption. The biliopancreatic limb and in particular its length is held responsible for the degree of the hypo-absorptive effect but the most appropriate or \"optimal\" length of the BPL remains debatable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following text is based on a comprehensive and meticulous selection of the most recent literature in Cochrane, Pubmed and Google Scholar using the search terms \"biliopancreatic limb\", \"biliopancreatic limb in one anastomosis gastric bypass\" in an attempt to define not only the most common used biliopancreatic limb length but also to find out If there is an \"ideal\" limb length not only to optimize the outcomes of the OAGB in terms of weight loss and resolution of obesity-related diseases but also to reduce the potential side-effects in particular nutritional deficiencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Until today there is no consensus about the \"standard\" or \"ideal\" length of the biliopancreatic limb in OAGB, a fixed length of 200 cm is still the most common used procedure although many reports and studies are in favour of shorter limb lengths adjusted to the BMI or the total small bowel length.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The \"ideal\" or \"optimal\" biliopancreatic limb length in OAGB still needs to be defined. There are different options and all of them have their credits, the question remains if a consensus can be reached regarding the best strategy to obtain the best outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1248744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), first published by Dr Rutledge in 1997 is now a well-established procedure in the bariatric-metabolic armamentarium. This procedure based on a (single) loop gastro-jejunal anastomosis (the biliopancreatic limb or BPL) with a long narrow gastric pouch combines restriction with hypo-absorption. The biliopancreatic limb and in particular its length is held responsible for the degree of the hypo-absorptive effect but the most appropriate or "optimal" length of the BPL remains debatable.

Methods: The following text is based on a comprehensive and meticulous selection of the most recent literature in Cochrane, Pubmed and Google Scholar using the search terms "biliopancreatic limb", "biliopancreatic limb in one anastomosis gastric bypass" in an attempt to define not only the most common used biliopancreatic limb length but also to find out If there is an "ideal" limb length not only to optimize the outcomes of the OAGB in terms of weight loss and resolution of obesity-related diseases but also to reduce the potential side-effects in particular nutritional deficiencies.

Results: Until today there is no consensus about the "standard" or "ideal" length of the biliopancreatic limb in OAGB, a fixed length of 200 cm is still the most common used procedure although many reports and studies are in favour of shorter limb lengths adjusted to the BMI or the total small bowel length.

Conclusion: The "ideal" or "optimal" biliopancreatic limb length in OAGB still needs to be defined. There are different options and all of them have their credits, the question remains if a consensus can be reached regarding the best strategy to obtain the best outcome.

单吻合胃旁路术中胆管胰管肢体的长度。
简介:单吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)由拉特里奇博士于 1997 年首次发表,现已成为减肥代谢手术中的一种成熟手术。该手术基于(单)环形胃空肠吻合(胆胰肢体或 BPL)和狭长胃袋,将限制和低吸收结合在一起。胆胰管肢体,尤其是其长度对低吸收效应的程度负有责任,但胆胰管肢体的最合适或 "最佳 "长度仍存在争议:以下内容基于对 Cochrane、Pubmed 和 Google Scholar 中最新文献的全面细致筛选,搜索关键词为 "biliopancreatic limb"、方法:以下文章基于 Cochrane、Pubmed 和 Google 学术中使用 "胆胰管肢体"、"单吻合胃旁路术中的胆胰管肢体 "等检索词对最新文献进行的全面、细致的筛选,不仅试图定义最常用的胆胰管肢体长度,还试图找出是否存在 "理想 "的肢体长度,以优化 OAGB 在减轻体重和解决肥胖相关疾病方面的效果,同时减少潜在的副作用,尤其是营养缺乏。结果:尽管许多报告和研究都支持根据体重指数(BMI)或小肠总长度调整更短的胆胰管肢体长度,但固定长度为 200 厘米的胆胰管肢体仍是最常用的手术方法:结论:OAGB 中 "理想 "或 "最佳 "的胆胰管肢体长度仍有待确定。有不同的选择,所有选择都有其优点,问题是能否就获得最佳结果的最佳策略达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信