Use of pumice stone and silica fume as precursor material for the design of a geopolymer.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2024-08-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.147701.2
Alexis Iván Andrade Valle, Tito Oswaldo Castillo Campoverde, Cristian Andrés Marcillo Zapata, María Gabriela Zúñiga Rodríguez, Andrea Natalí Zárate Villacrés, Marcelo David Guerra Valladares, Mayte Lisbeth Mieles Mariño, Jefferson Javier Castillo Cevallos
{"title":"Use of pumice stone and silica fume as precursor material for the design of a geopolymer.","authors":"Alexis Iván Andrade Valle, Tito Oswaldo Castillo Campoverde, Cristian Andrés Marcillo Zapata, María Gabriela Zúñiga Rodríguez, Andrea Natalí Zárate Villacrés, Marcelo David Guerra Valladares, Mayte Lisbeth Mieles Mariño, Jefferson Javier Castillo Cevallos","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.147701.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geopolymers are alternative materials to cement because they require less energy in their production process; hence, they contribute to the reduction in CO <sub>2</sub> emissions. This study aims to evaluate the possibility of using industrial residues such as silica fume (SF) to improve the physical and mechanical properties of a pumice stone (PS)-based geopolymer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through an experimental methodology, the process starts with the extraction, grinding, and sieving of the raw material to carry out the physical and chemical characterization of the resulting material, followed by the dosage of the geopolymer mixture considering the factors that influence the resistance mechanical strength. Finally, the physical and mechanical properties of the geopolymer were characterized. This research was carried out in four stages: characterization of the pumice stone, design of the geopolymer through laboratory tests, application according to the dosage of the concrete, and analysis of the data through a multi-criteria analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was determined that the optimal percentage of SF replacement is 10%, which to improves the properties of the geopolymer allowing to reach a maximum resistance to compression and flexion of 14.10 MPa and 4.78 MPa respectively, showing that there is a direct relationship between the percentage of SF and the resistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Geopolymer preparation involves the use of PS powder with a composition rich in silicon and aluminum. The factors influencing strength include the ratio of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide, water content, temperature, curing time, molarity of sodium hydroxide, and binder ratio. The results showed an increase in the compression and flexural strength with 10% SF replacement. The geopolymer's maximum compressive strength indicates its non-structural use, but it can be improved by reducing the PS powder size.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.147701.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Geopolymers are alternative materials to cement because they require less energy in their production process; hence, they contribute to the reduction in CO 2 emissions. This study aims to evaluate the possibility of using industrial residues such as silica fume (SF) to improve the physical and mechanical properties of a pumice stone (PS)-based geopolymer.

Methods: Through an experimental methodology, the process starts with the extraction, grinding, and sieving of the raw material to carry out the physical and chemical characterization of the resulting material, followed by the dosage of the geopolymer mixture considering the factors that influence the resistance mechanical strength. Finally, the physical and mechanical properties of the geopolymer were characterized. This research was carried out in four stages: characterization of the pumice stone, design of the geopolymer through laboratory tests, application according to the dosage of the concrete, and analysis of the data through a multi-criteria analysis.

Results: It was determined that the optimal percentage of SF replacement is 10%, which to improves the properties of the geopolymer allowing to reach a maximum resistance to compression and flexion of 14.10 MPa and 4.78 MPa respectively, showing that there is a direct relationship between the percentage of SF and the resistance.

Conclusions: Geopolymer preparation involves the use of PS powder with a composition rich in silicon and aluminum. The factors influencing strength include the ratio of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide, water content, temperature, curing time, molarity of sodium hydroxide, and binder ratio. The results showed an increase in the compression and flexural strength with 10% SF replacement. The geopolymer's maximum compressive strength indicates its non-structural use, but it can be improved by reducing the PS powder size.

使用浮石和硅灰作为设计土工聚合物的前体材料。
背景:土工聚合物是水泥的替代材料,因为它们在生产过程中需要的能源较少,因此有助于减少二氧化碳排放。本研究旨在评估利用硅灰(SF)等工业残渣改善浮石(PS)基土工聚合物的物理和机械性能的可能性:通过实验方法,首先对原材料进行提取、研磨和筛分,对所得材料进行物理和化学特性分析,然后考虑影响抗性机械强度的因素,确定土工聚合物混合物的用量。最后,对土工聚合物的物理和机械性能进行表征。这项研究分四个阶段进行:浮石的特征描述、通过实验室测试设计土工聚合物、根据混凝土的用量进行应用,以及通过多标准分析对数据进行分析:结果:确定了最佳的 SF 替代比例为 10%,该比例可改善土工聚合物的性能,使其最大抗压和抗弯强度分别达到 14.10 兆帕和 4.78 兆帕,这表明 SF 的比例与抗压强度之间存在直接关系:土工聚合物的制备包括使用富含硅和铝的 PS 粉末。影响强度的因素包括硅酸钠与氢氧化钠的比例、含水量、温度、固化时间、氢氧化钠摩尔数和粘结剂比例。结果表明,硅酸钠替代率为 10%时,压缩强度和抗折强度都有所提高。土工聚合物的最大抗压强度表明其不具有结构用途,但可以通过减小 PS 粉的粒径来提高抗压强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信