Strain surveillance during chemotherapy to improve cardiovascular outcomes: the SUCCOUR-MRI trial.

IF 37.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Thomas H Marwick, Elizabeth Dewar, Mark Nolan, Mitra Shirazi, Peter Dias, Leah Wright, Ben Fitzgerald, Leighton Kearney, Piyush Srivastava, John Atherton, Kazuaki Negishi, Aaron L Sverdlov, Sudhir Wahi, James Otton, Joseph Selvanayagam, Liza Thomas, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan
{"title":"Strain surveillance during chemotherapy to improve cardiovascular outcomes: the SUCCOUR-MRI trial.","authors":"Thomas H Marwick, Elizabeth Dewar, Mark Nolan, Mitra Shirazi, Peter Dias, Leah Wright, Ben Fitzgerald, Leighton Kearney, Piyush Srivastava, John Atherton, Kazuaki Negishi, Aaron L Sverdlov, Sudhir Wahi, James Otton, Joseph Selvanayagam, Liza Thomas, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehae574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The detection of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) by reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during chemotherapy usually triggers the initiation of cardioprotective therapy. This study addressed whether the same approach should be applied to patients with worsening of global longitudinal strain (GLS) without attaining thresholds of LVEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Strain surveillance during chemotherapy for improving cardiovascular outcomes (SUCCOUR-MRI) was a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial involving 14 sites. Of 355 patients receiving anthracyclines with normal baseline LVEF, 333 patients (age 59 ± 13 years, 79% women) with at least one other CTRCD risk factor, able to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), GLS, and three-dimensional echocardiography were tracked over 12 months. A total of 105 patients (age 59 ± 13 years, 75% women, 69% breast cancer) developing GLS-CTRCD (>12% relative reduction of GLS without a change in LVEF) were randomized to cardioprotection with neurohormonal antagonists vs. usual care. The primary endpoint was 12-month change in MRI-LVEF; the secondary endpoint was MRI-LVEF-defined CTRCD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During follow-up, two patients died, and two developed heart failure. Most patients were randomized at 3 months (62%). Median doses of angiotensin inhibition/blockade and beta-blockade were 75% and 50% of respective targets; 21 (43%) had side-effects attributed to cardioprotection. Due to a smaller LVEF change from baseline with cardioprotection than usual care (-2.5 ± 5.4% vs. -5.6 ± 5.9%, P = .009), follow-up LVEF was higher after cardioprotection (59 ± 5% vs. 55 ± 6%, P < .0001). After adjustment for baseline LVEF, the mean (95% confidence interval) difference in the change in LVEF between the two groups was -3.6% (-1.8% to -5.5%, P < .001). After cardioprotection, 1/49 patients developed 12-month LVEF-CTRCD, compared to 6/56 in usual care (P = .075). Global longitudinal strain improved at 3 months post-randomization in the cardioprotection group, with little change with usual care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with isolated GLS reduction after anthracyclines, cardioprotection is associated with better preservation of 12-month MRI-LVEF compared with usual care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"4414-4424"},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The detection of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) by reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during chemotherapy usually triggers the initiation of cardioprotective therapy. This study addressed whether the same approach should be applied to patients with worsening of global longitudinal strain (GLS) without attaining thresholds of LVEF.

Methods: Strain surveillance during chemotherapy for improving cardiovascular outcomes (SUCCOUR-MRI) was a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial involving 14 sites. Of 355 patients receiving anthracyclines with normal baseline LVEF, 333 patients (age 59 ± 13 years, 79% women) with at least one other CTRCD risk factor, able to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), GLS, and three-dimensional echocardiography were tracked over 12 months. A total of 105 patients (age 59 ± 13 years, 75% women, 69% breast cancer) developing GLS-CTRCD (>12% relative reduction of GLS without a change in LVEF) were randomized to cardioprotection with neurohormonal antagonists vs. usual care. The primary endpoint was 12-month change in MRI-LVEF; the secondary endpoint was MRI-LVEF-defined CTRCD.

Results: During follow-up, two patients died, and two developed heart failure. Most patients were randomized at 3 months (62%). Median doses of angiotensin inhibition/blockade and beta-blockade were 75% and 50% of respective targets; 21 (43%) had side-effects attributed to cardioprotection. Due to a smaller LVEF change from baseline with cardioprotection than usual care (-2.5 ± 5.4% vs. -5.6 ± 5.9%, P = .009), follow-up LVEF was higher after cardioprotection (59 ± 5% vs. 55 ± 6%, P < .0001). After adjustment for baseline LVEF, the mean (95% confidence interval) difference in the change in LVEF between the two groups was -3.6% (-1.8% to -5.5%, P < .001). After cardioprotection, 1/49 patients developed 12-month LVEF-CTRCD, compared to 6/56 in usual care (P = .075). Global longitudinal strain improved at 3 months post-randomization in the cardioprotection group, with little change with usual care.

Conclusions: In patients with isolated GLS reduction after anthracyclines, cardioprotection is associated with better preservation of 12-month MRI-LVEF compared with usual care.

化疗期间的应变监测以改善心血管预后:SUCCOUR-MRI 试验。
背景和目的:通过化疗期间左心室射血分数(LVEF)的降低发现癌症治疗相关心功能障碍(CTRCD),通常会启动心脏保护治疗。本研究探讨了是否应将同样的方法应用于全球纵向应变(GLS)恶化但未达到 LVEF 临界值的患者:化疗期间应变监测改善心血管预后(SUCCOUR-MRI)是一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验,共有14个研究机构参与。在基线 LVEF 正常的 355 名接受蒽环类药物治疗的患者中,有 333 名患者(年龄为 59±13 岁,79% 为女性)至少有一个其他 CTRCD 危险因素,能够接受磁共振成像 (MRI)、GLS 和三维超声心动图检查,并接受了 12 个月的跟踪随访。共有 105 名患者(年龄为 59±13 岁,75% 为女性,69% 为乳腺癌患者)出现 GLS-CTRCD (GLS 相对减少 >12%,但 LVEF 无变化),在神经激素拮抗剂心脏保护与常规治疗之间进行了随机分配。主要终点是12个月的MRI-LVEF变化;次要终点是MRI LVEF定义的CTRCD:随访期间,2 名患者死亡,2 名患者出现心力衰竭。大多数患者在 3 个月时接受了随机治疗(62%)。血管紧张素抑制/阻滞剂和β-受体阻滞剂的中位剂量分别为目标剂量的75%和50%;21例(43%)患者出现了心脏保护副作用。由于心脏保护后 LVEF 与基线相比的变化小于常规治疗(-2.5±5.4% vs -5.6±5.9%,p=0.009),心脏保护后的随访 LVEF 较高(59±5% vs 55±6%,p结论:在使用蒽环类药物后出现孤立 GLS 减少的患者中,与常规治疗相比,心脏保护能更好地保留 12 个月的 MRI LVEF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信