A decade of follow-up: atrial fibrillation, pulmonary pressure, and the progression of tricuspid regurgitation.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ranel Loutati, Asaf Katz, Amit Segev, Rafael Kuperstein, Avi Sabbag, Elad Maor
{"title":"A decade of follow-up: atrial fibrillation, pulmonary pressure, and the progression of tricuspid regurgitation.","authors":"Ranel Loutati, Asaf Katz, Amit Segev, Rafael Kuperstein, Avi Sabbag, Elad Maor","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Long-term data on atrial fibrillation (AF) impact on tricuspid regurgitation (TR) progression and its relation to pulmonary pressure are scant. We investigated this association in a study spanning over a decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with echocardiographic evaluation before 2014, free of significant TR, were included. Patients were dichotomized by baseline AF, followed by stratification according to systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP). The development of new significant TR and its impact on mortality were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study population included 21 502 patients (median age 65, 40% female), 13% had baseline AF. During a median follow-up of 12 years, 11% developed significant TR. Compared with patients free of AF, patients with baseline AF were 3.5 and 1.3 times more likely to develop significant TR in a univariate and multivariate models, respectively (95% CI 3.27-3.91, 1.18-1.44, p < 0.001 for both). The risk of TR progression was higher in patients with permanent AF and those treated with rate control strategy (HR 1.95 and 2.01, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). The association of AF with TR progression was sPAP-related, being more pronounced among patients with normal sPAP than among those with elevated sPAP (HR 1.5 vs. 1.18; p for interaction < 0.001). TR progression was independently linked to a two-fold higher mortality risk, consistent regardless of baseline AF (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AF is an independent predictor of TR progression, especially in patients with normal sPAP. Subsequent research on strategies to prevent TR progression in this patient population are warranted.This analysis investigated the association of AF with TR progression, and the interaction of pulmonary arterial pressure with this link. Among patients with AF (Left), progression to significant TR is highly prevalent, with higher risk among patients with permanent AF and lower risk in those treated with rhythm control strategy. Pulmonary arterial pressure interacts with this association (Right), such that among patients with normal sPAP, the link between AF and TR progression is stronger, suggesting that the importance of proactive AF management in this sugroup of patients. TR has important implications on mortality, regardless of AF status (Middle).AF = Atrial Fibrillation; A-STR = Atrial Secondary TR; CIED = cardiac implantable electronic device; TR = Tricuspid Regurgitation; V-STR = Ventricular Secondary TR.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Long-term data on atrial fibrillation (AF) impact on tricuspid regurgitation (TR) progression and its relation to pulmonary pressure are scant. We investigated this association in a study spanning over a decade.

Methods: Adults with echocardiographic evaluation before 2014, free of significant TR, were included. Patients were dichotomized by baseline AF, followed by stratification according to systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP). The development of new significant TR and its impact on mortality were studied.

Results: Study population included 21 502 patients (median age 65, 40% female), 13% had baseline AF. During a median follow-up of 12 years, 11% developed significant TR. Compared with patients free of AF, patients with baseline AF were 3.5 and 1.3 times more likely to develop significant TR in a univariate and multivariate models, respectively (95% CI 3.27-3.91, 1.18-1.44, p < 0.001 for both). The risk of TR progression was higher in patients with permanent AF and those treated with rate control strategy (HR 1.95 and 2.01, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). The association of AF with TR progression was sPAP-related, being more pronounced among patients with normal sPAP than among those with elevated sPAP (HR 1.5 vs. 1.18; p for interaction < 0.001). TR progression was independently linked to a two-fold higher mortality risk, consistent regardless of baseline AF (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: AF is an independent predictor of TR progression, especially in patients with normal sPAP. Subsequent research on strategies to prevent TR progression in this patient population are warranted.This analysis investigated the association of AF with TR progression, and the interaction of pulmonary arterial pressure with this link. Among patients with AF (Left), progression to significant TR is highly prevalent, with higher risk among patients with permanent AF and lower risk in those treated with rhythm control strategy. Pulmonary arterial pressure interacts with this association (Right), such that among patients with normal sPAP, the link between AF and TR progression is stronger, suggesting that the importance of proactive AF management in this sugroup of patients. TR has important implications on mortality, regardless of AF status (Middle).AF = Atrial Fibrillation; A-STR = Atrial Secondary TR; CIED = cardiac implantable electronic device; TR = Tricuspid Regurgitation; V-STR = Ventricular Secondary TR.

十年随访:心房颤动、肺动脉压力和三尖瓣反流的进展。
背景和目的:有关心房颤动(AF)对三尖瓣反流(TR)进展的影响及其与肺动脉压力关系的长期数据很少。我们在一项跨越十年的研究中调查了这种关联:方法:纳入 2014 年之前接受超声心动图评估、无明显三尖瓣反流的成年人。根据基线房颤对患者进行二分,然后根据肺动脉收缩压(sPAP)进行分层。研究了新出现的明显TR及其对死亡率的影响:研究对象包括 21 502 名患者(中位年龄 65 岁,40% 为女性),其中 13% 有基线房颤。在12年的中位随访期间,11%的患者出现了明显的TR。与无房颤的患者相比,在单变量和多变量模型中,基线房颤患者发生明显TR的几率分别是无房颤患者的3.5倍和1.3倍(95% CI 3.27-3.91, 1.18-1.44, p 结论:房颤是发生明显TR的独立预测因素:房颤是 TR 进展的独立预测因素,尤其是在 sPAP 正常的患者中。本分析调查了房颤与 TR 进展的关系,以及肺动脉压与这一关系的相互作用。在房颤患者(左侧)中,进展为明显TR的情况非常普遍,永久性房颤患者的风险较高,而接受节律控制策略治疗的患者风险较低。肺动脉压与这一关联相互影响(右图),因此在 sPAP 正常的患者中,房颤与 TR 进展之间的关联更强,这表明对这部分患者进行积极的房颤管理非常重要。无论房颤状态如何,TR 对死亡率都有重要影响(中)。AF = 心房颤动;A-STR = 心房继发性 TR;CIED = 心脏植入式电子装置;TR = 三尖瓣反流;V-STR = 心室继发性 TR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信