Cyberbullying and Suicidal Behavior, Self-Harm, and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Irene Morales-Arjona, Vivian Benítez-Hidalgo, Isabel Ruiz-Pérez, Camila Higueras-Callejón, Guadalupe Pastor-Moreno
{"title":"Cyberbullying and Suicidal Behavior, Self-Harm, and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.","authors":"Irene Morales-Arjona, Vivian Benítez-Hidalgo, Isabel Ruiz-Pérez, Camila Higueras-Callejón, Guadalupe Pastor-Moreno","doi":"10.1089/cyber.2024.0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Aim:</i></b> Identify and systematically review cohort studies examining the association between cyberbullying (CB) and suicidal ideation, attempted suicide, self-harm, and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines. Searches for relevant literature were conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, PsyINFO, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane up until July 2023. Cohort studies were included that provided information regarding the association between CB and different dimensions pertaining to self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) separately. Gathered information included data on study characteristics, sample characteristics, prevalence, and associations between CB and variables pertaining to SITB. Findings were synthesized, and grouping studies as a function of the outcome variable was analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 19 studies were included. Suicidal ideation was analyzed in 11 studies, with the majority (<i>n</i> = 8) reporting statistically significant positive associations (aOR = 1.88 [1.08, 3.29], β = 0.08 to 0.47). Only a single study conducted independent analysis of attempted suicide, finding a statistically significant association (aOR 1.88 [1.08, 3.29]). Outcomes regarding the self-harm variable were equivocal, with only two out of five studies finding a statistically significant association and one of these, which conducted a gender differentiated analysis, only finding a significant association in females. Studies that considered the NSSI dimension were also inconclusive, with only a limited number of studies (<i>n</i> = 5) producing contradictory outcomes. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> There is a need to continue exploring the relationship between CB and different dimensions within the spectrum of SITB through longitudinal studies. It is recommended that analyses adopt a new perspective in which short-term follow-up is prioritized or individualized follow-up periods are considered, given the rapidly changing nature of suicidal tendencies. It would be interesting to analyze the frequency, persistence, or severity of CB events and broaden research to include all age ranges. Special attention should also be given to potential gender differences and possible mediators or moderators.</p>","PeriodicalId":10872,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2024.0097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Identify and systematically review cohort studies examining the association between cyberbullying (CB) and suicidal ideation, attempted suicide, self-harm, and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). Methods: Systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines. Searches for relevant literature were conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, PsyINFO, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane up until July 2023. Cohort studies were included that provided information regarding the association between CB and different dimensions pertaining to self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) separately. Gathered information included data on study characteristics, sample characteristics, prevalence, and associations between CB and variables pertaining to SITB. Findings were synthesized, and grouping studies as a function of the outcome variable was analyzed. Results: A total of 19 studies were included. Suicidal ideation was analyzed in 11 studies, with the majority (n = 8) reporting statistically significant positive associations (aOR = 1.88 [1.08, 3.29], β = 0.08 to 0.47). Only a single study conducted independent analysis of attempted suicide, finding a statistically significant association (aOR 1.88 [1.08, 3.29]). Outcomes regarding the self-harm variable were equivocal, with only two out of five studies finding a statistically significant association and one of these, which conducted a gender differentiated analysis, only finding a significant association in females. Studies that considered the NSSI dimension were also inconclusive, with only a limited number of studies (n = 5) producing contradictory outcomes. Conclusion: There is a need to continue exploring the relationship between CB and different dimensions within the spectrum of SITB through longitudinal studies. It is recommended that analyses adopt a new perspective in which short-term follow-up is prioritized or individualized follow-up periods are considered, given the rapidly changing nature of suicidal tendencies. It would be interesting to analyze the frequency, persistence, or severity of CB events and broaden research to include all age ranges. Special attention should also be given to potential gender differences and possible mediators or moderators.

网络欺凌与自杀行为、自残和非自杀性自伤:纵向研究的系统回顾。
目的:确定并系统回顾研究网络欺凌(CB)与自杀意念、自杀未遂、自残和非自杀性自伤(NSSI)之间关系的队列研究。研究方法:按照 PRISMA 指南进行系统文献综述。在 Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed、PsyINFO、CINAHL、Embase 和 Cochrane 中检索相关文献,检索时间截至 2023 年 7 月。纳入的队列研究分别提供了有关 CB 与自我伤害想法和行为(SITB)不同维度之间关联的信息。收集的信息包括研究特征、样本特征、流行率以及 CB 与 SITB 相关变量之间的关联等数据。我们对研究结果进行了综合,并根据结果变量对研究进行了分组分析。结果:共纳入了 19 项研究。11 项研究对自杀意念进行了分析,其中大多数(n = 8)报告了具有统计学意义的正相关(aOR = 1.88 [1.08, 3.29],β = 0.08 至 0.47)。只有一项研究对自杀未遂进行了独立分析,发现两者之间有统计学意义的关联(aOR = 1.88 [1.08, 3.29])。有关自残变量的研究结果不明确,五项研究中仅有两项发现两者之间存在统计学意义上的显著关联,其中一项进行了性别差异分析,仅发现女性与自残存在显著关联。考虑到 NSSI 方面的研究也没有定论,只有少数研究(n = 5)得出了相互矛盾的结果。结论有必要通过纵向研究继续探索 CB 与 SITB 范围内不同维度之间的关系。鉴于自杀倾向的性质瞬息万变,建议采用新的视角进行分析,优先考虑短期随访或个性化随访期。对 CB 事件的频率、持续性或严重性进行分析,并将研究范围扩大到所有年龄段,将是非常有意义的。还应特别关注潜在的性别差异以及可能的中介或调节因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a leading peer-reviewed journal that is recognized for its authoritative research on the social, behavioral, and psychological impacts of contemporary social networking practices. The journal covers a wide range of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, internet gaming, and e-commerce, and examines how these digital environments shape human interaction and societal norms. For over two decades, this journal has been a pioneering voice in the exploration of social networking and virtual reality, establishing itself as an indispensable resource for professionals and academics in the field. It is particularly celebrated for its swift dissemination of findings through rapid communication articles, alongside comprehensive, in-depth studies that delve into the multifaceted effects of interactive technologies on both individual behavior and broader societal trends. The journal's scope encompasses the full spectrum of impacts—highlighting not only the potential benefits but also the challenges that arise as a result of these technologies. By providing a platform for rigorous research and critical discussions, it fosters a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信