Applying Engagement Marketing and Human-Centered Design to Cocreate a Digital Decision Support Tool for Research Participation with LGBTQIA+ Community Members.

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Jennifer D Uhrig, Allyson M Corbo, Jill A Brown, Katie Baker, Marcel Foster, Alyssa Jordan, Daniel Moretti, Ana Rescate, Chelsea Gieck, Julie Gras-Najjar, Alexa Ortiz, Schuyler DeBree, Megan A Lewis
{"title":"Applying Engagement Marketing and Human-Centered Design to Cocreate a Digital Decision Support Tool for Research Participation with LGBTQIA+ Community Members.","authors":"Jennifer D Uhrig, Allyson M Corbo, Jill A Brown, Katie Baker, Marcel Foster, Alyssa Jordan, Daniel Moretti, Ana Rescate, Chelsea Gieck, Julie Gras-Najjar, Alexa Ortiz, Schuyler DeBree, Megan A Lewis","doi":"10.1089/cyber.2023.0689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We used engagement marketing and human-centered design principles to cocreate a digital decision support tool for research participation with LGBTQIA+ community members to help them make an informed decision about joining the All of Us Research Program. Building on results from the research phase, we conducted eight problem validation and solutioning workshops with 48 LGBTQIA+ community members. Community members validated barriers to engagement with <i>All of Us</i> and brainstormed 47 potential digital solutions. We developed potential solutions into 27 concepts (descriptive text and visual storyboards) and assessed acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and engagement in a set of 10 concept testing workshops with 57 community members. We developed one of the highest rated concepts, the \"Decide Later Tool,\" into a prototype and tested it with 45 LGBTQIA+ community members and 14 community advisory group members to assess acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, usability, and engagement. Prototype testing participants indicated that the tool provides information to help with decision making, provides a clear value or benefit to them, was designed for someone like them, provides the right amount of information, and is easy to use; they also offered constructive feedback to improve it. Across the design and development phases, community members indicated that the process of engaging them demonstrated integrity, competence, dependability, trust, and collaboration; fostered a sense of connection to <i>All of Us</i>; and will enhance future engagement with <i>All of Us</i>. Our next steps are to develop the prototype into a fully functioning web tool and pilot test it in community and health care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10872,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","volume":" ","pages":"881-893"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We used engagement marketing and human-centered design principles to cocreate a digital decision support tool for research participation with LGBTQIA+ community members to help them make an informed decision about joining the All of Us Research Program. Building on results from the research phase, we conducted eight problem validation and solutioning workshops with 48 LGBTQIA+ community members. Community members validated barriers to engagement with All of Us and brainstormed 47 potential digital solutions. We developed potential solutions into 27 concepts (descriptive text and visual storyboards) and assessed acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and engagement in a set of 10 concept testing workshops with 57 community members. We developed one of the highest rated concepts, the "Decide Later Tool," into a prototype and tested it with 45 LGBTQIA+ community members and 14 community advisory group members to assess acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, usability, and engagement. Prototype testing participants indicated that the tool provides information to help with decision making, provides a clear value or benefit to them, was designed for someone like them, provides the right amount of information, and is easy to use; they also offered constructive feedback to improve it. Across the design and development phases, community members indicated that the process of engaging them demonstrated integrity, competence, dependability, trust, and collaboration; fostered a sense of connection to All of Us; and will enhance future engagement with All of Us. Our next steps are to develop the prototype into a fully functioning web tool and pilot test it in community and health care settings.

应用参与式营销和以人为本的设计,为 LGBTQIA+ 社区成员参与研究创造数字决策支持工具。
我们利用参与式营销和以人为本的设计原则,与 LGBTQIA+ 社区成员共同创建了一个用于参与研究的数字决策支持工具,帮助他们就加入 "我们所有人 "研究计划做出明智的决定。在研究阶段取得的成果基础上,我们与 48 名 LGBTQIA+ 社区成员开展了八次问题验证和解决方案研讨会。社区成员确认了参与 "我们所有人 "计划的障碍,并集思广益,提出了 47 个潜在的数字解决方案。我们将潜在解决方案发展成 27 个概念(描述性文本和视觉故事板),并在与 57 名社区成员进行的 10 次概念测试研讨会上评估了可接受性、适当性、可行性和参与度。我们将评分最高的概念之一 "稍后决定工具 "开发成原型,并与 45 名 LGBTQIA+ 社区成员和 14 名社区咨询小组成员进行了测试,以评估可接受性、适当性、可行性、可用性和参与度。原型测试参与者表示,该工具提供了有助于决策的信息,为他们带来了明确的价值或益处,是为他们这样的人设计的,提供了适量的信息,并且易于使用;他们还提出了建设性的反馈意见以改进该工具。在整个设计和开发阶段,社区成员都表示,让他们参与其中的过程体现了诚信、能力、可靠性、信任和协作;培养了与 "我们所有人 "的联系感;并将加强未来与 "我们所有人 "的联系。我们的下一步计划是将原型开发成功能完善的网络工具,并在社区和医疗机构进行试点测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a leading peer-reviewed journal that is recognized for its authoritative research on the social, behavioral, and psychological impacts of contemporary social networking practices. The journal covers a wide range of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, internet gaming, and e-commerce, and examines how these digital environments shape human interaction and societal norms. For over two decades, this journal has been a pioneering voice in the exploration of social networking and virtual reality, establishing itself as an indispensable resource for professionals and academics in the field. It is particularly celebrated for its swift dissemination of findings through rapid communication articles, alongside comprehensive, in-depth studies that delve into the multifaceted effects of interactive technologies on both individual behavior and broader societal trends. The journal's scope encompasses the full spectrum of impacts—highlighting not only the potential benefits but also the challenges that arise as a result of these technologies. By providing a platform for rigorous research and critical discussions, it fosters a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信