Sung-Woon On, Dong-Kyu Kim, Min Hyuk Lee, Ji Hae Lee, Kyung Chul Lee, Soo-Hwan Byun, Seok Jin Hong
{"title":"Clinical efficacy study of position-responding mandibular advancement device in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.","authors":"Sung-Woon On, Dong-Kyu Kim, Min Hyuk Lee, Ji Hae Lee, Kyung Chul Lee, Soo-Hwan Byun, Seok Jin Hong","doi":"10.21053/ceo.2024.00124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although mandibular advancement device (MAD) treatment is effective in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there are still some concerns about its potential therapeutic and side effects. Thus, we developed a novel MAD that auto-titrates depending on its position in patients with OSA. Therefore, we conducted a clinical trial to determine the efficacy of an auto-titrating mandibular advancement device (AMAD) for treating OSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen patients with OSA were enrolled in this study. Polysomnography (PSG) was conducted at the start of the clinical trial, and PSG with AMAD in situ was performed after three months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and STOP-Bang scores were 8.21 ± 4.21 and 5.00 ± 1.00, respectively. After 3 months of treating AMAD, STOP-Bang scores improved to 3.75 ± 1.06; however, there was no significant change in ESS scores. Additionally, we found statistically significant improvements in several respiratory parameters in the PSG data after AMAD treatment. The AHI (32.85 ± 21.71 to 12.93 ± 10.70), supine AHI (45.91 ± 23.58 to 15.59 ± 12.76), lateral AHI (13.94 ± 10.95 to .49 ± 7.40), lowest O2 saturation (79.71 ± 6.22 to 84.00 ± 5.71), total arousal number (191.14 ± 112.07 to 86.57 ± 48.80), and arousal index (33.76 ± 21.00 to 15.05 ± 8.42) were recorded. However, there were no significant changes in total sleep time, sleep efficiency, or mean oxygen saturation. Additionally, we did not observe any major side effects during treatment, specifically related to tooth or jaw pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our clinical trial revealed that AMAD improved PSG parameters and reduced the incidence of common side effects. Therefore, AMAD may be an effective alternative treatment for OSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10318,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2024.00124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Although mandibular advancement device (MAD) treatment is effective in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there are still some concerns about its potential therapeutic and side effects. Thus, we developed a novel MAD that auto-titrates depending on its position in patients with OSA. Therefore, we conducted a clinical trial to determine the efficacy of an auto-titrating mandibular advancement device (AMAD) for treating OSA.
Methods: Fourteen patients with OSA were enrolled in this study. Polysomnography (PSG) was conducted at the start of the clinical trial, and PSG with AMAD in situ was performed after three months of treatment.
Results: The mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and STOP-Bang scores were 8.21 ± 4.21 and 5.00 ± 1.00, respectively. After 3 months of treating AMAD, STOP-Bang scores improved to 3.75 ± 1.06; however, there was no significant change in ESS scores. Additionally, we found statistically significant improvements in several respiratory parameters in the PSG data after AMAD treatment. The AHI (32.85 ± 21.71 to 12.93 ± 10.70), supine AHI (45.91 ± 23.58 to 15.59 ± 12.76), lateral AHI (13.94 ± 10.95 to .49 ± 7.40), lowest O2 saturation (79.71 ± 6.22 to 84.00 ± 5.71), total arousal number (191.14 ± 112.07 to 86.57 ± 48.80), and arousal index (33.76 ± 21.00 to 15.05 ± 8.42) were recorded. However, there were no significant changes in total sleep time, sleep efficiency, or mean oxygen saturation. Additionally, we did not observe any major side effects during treatment, specifically related to tooth or jaw pain.
Conclusion: Our clinical trial revealed that AMAD improved PSG parameters and reduced the incidence of common side effects. Therefore, AMAD may be an effective alternative treatment for OSA.
期刊介绍：
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology (Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, CEO) is an international peer-reviewed journal on recent developments in diagnosis and treatment of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery and dedicated to the advancement of patient care in ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders. This journal publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic researches, reviews, and clinical trials, encompassing the whole topics of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery.
CEO was first issued in 2008 and this journal is published in English four times (the last day of February, May, August, and November) per year by the Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. The Journal aims at publishing evidence-based, scientifically written articles from different disciplines of otorhinolaryngology field.
The readership contains clinical/basic research into current practice in otorhinolaryngology, audiology, speech pathology, head and neck oncology, plastic and reconstructive surgery. The readers are otolaryngologists, head and neck surgeons and oncologists, audiologists, and speech pathologists.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
