A novel suturing technique for natural tissue repair in cystocele treatment.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Rahime Bedir Fındık, Melike Doğanay, Orhan Seyfi Aksakal, Zuhal Yapıcı Çoşkun, Jale Karakaya
{"title":"A novel suturing technique for natural tissue repair in cystocele treatment.","authors":"Rahime Bedir Fındık, Melike Doğanay, Orhan Seyfi Aksakal, Zuhal Yapıcı Çoşkun, Jale Karakaya","doi":"10.1186/s12905-024-03317-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, natural tissue repair has become popular in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapsed. In this study, we compared patients who underwent cystocele repair with the rug-weaving plication technique, a natural tissue repair method implemented since 2022 for anterior prolapse, with those treated using conventional colporrhaphy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the data of 65 patients who underwent anterior vaginal wall repair with the rug-weaving plication technique (n = 33, Group 1) or conventional colporrhaphy (n = 32, Group 2). We recorded the patients' clinicodemographic and surgical data. At the 6-month postoperative follow-up, we assessed patients' complaints, degree of prolapse (using the simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system), and pelvic floor muscle strength (using the Modified Oxford Score). Anterior vaginal wall thickness was measured using transvaginal ultrasonography. We compared clinicodemographic and surgical data and postoperative outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups were comparable in terms of age (p = 0.326), number of pregnancies (p = 0.307), number of parities (p = 0.555), preoperative anterior wall simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification grade (p = 0.380), preoperative apical prolapse simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification grade (p = 0.518), postoperative Modified Oxford Score (p = 0.857), operation time (p = 0.809), postoperative haemoglobin (p = 0.674), and amount of bleeding (p = 0.951). Compared with Group 2, Group 1 had significantly higher postoperative anterior vaginal wall thickness (p < 0.001) and significantly lower postoperative anterior wall simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification grade (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rug-weaving plication technique may offer a viable alternative for cystocele repair without mesh, using natural tissue and potentially reducing mesh-related complications and recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>NCT06410469 (03/05/2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03317-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recently, natural tissue repair has become popular in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapsed. In this study, we compared patients who underwent cystocele repair with the rug-weaving plication technique, a natural tissue repair method implemented since 2022 for anterior prolapse, with those treated using conventional colporrhaphy.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 65 patients who underwent anterior vaginal wall repair with the rug-weaving plication technique (n = 33, Group 1) or conventional colporrhaphy (n = 32, Group 2). We recorded the patients' clinicodemographic and surgical data. At the 6-month postoperative follow-up, we assessed patients' complaints, degree of prolapse (using the simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system), and pelvic floor muscle strength (using the Modified Oxford Score). Anterior vaginal wall thickness was measured using transvaginal ultrasonography. We compared clinicodemographic and surgical data and postoperative outcomes between the two groups.

Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of age (p = 0.326), number of pregnancies (p = 0.307), number of parities (p = 0.555), preoperative anterior wall simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification grade (p = 0.380), preoperative apical prolapse simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification grade (p = 0.518), postoperative Modified Oxford Score (p = 0.857), operation time (p = 0.809), postoperative haemoglobin (p = 0.674), and amount of bleeding (p = 0.951). Compared with Group 2, Group 1 had significantly higher postoperative anterior vaginal wall thickness (p < 0.001) and significantly lower postoperative anterior wall simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification grade (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The rug-weaving plication technique may offer a viable alternative for cystocele repair without mesh, using natural tissue and potentially reducing mesh-related complications and recurrence rates.

Clinical trial number: NCT06410469 (03/05/2024).

用于膀胱囊肿治疗中自然组织修复的新型缝合技术。
背景:最近,自然组织修复法在盆腔器官脱垂的治疗中开始流行起来。在这项研究中,我们比较了使用织毯成形术(一种自 2022 年开始用于治疗前脱垂的自然组织修复方法)进行膀胱阴道壁修复的患者和使用传统结肠成形术治疗的患者:我们回顾性地审查了65名患者的数据,这些患者均接受了织毯犁接技术阴道前壁修补术(第1组,33人)或传统结肠切除术(第2组,32人)。我们记录了患者的临床人口学和手术数据。在术后 6 个月的随访中,我们评估了患者的主诉、脱垂程度(使用简化的盆腔器官脱垂量化系统)和盆底肌肉力量(使用改良牛津评分)。阴道前壁厚度通过经阴道超声波检查进行测量。我们比较了两组患者的临床人口学和手术数据以及术后结果:结果:两组在年龄(p = 0.326)、妊娠次数(p = 0.307)、产次(p = 0.555)、术前前壁简化盆腔脏器脱垂量化分级(p = 0.380)、术前顶端脱垂简化盆腔脏器脱垂定量分级(p = 0.518)、术后改良牛津评分(p = 0.857)、手术时间(p = 0.809)、术后血红蛋白(p = 0.674)和出血量(p = 0.951)。与第 2 组相比,第 1 组术后阴道前壁厚度明显更高(p 结论:第 1 组术后阴道前壁厚度明显低于第 2 组:织毯植入技术可为无网片膀胱囊肿修复术提供一种可行的替代方法,它使用天然组织,有可能降低与网片相关的并发症和复发率:NCT06410469 (03/05/2024).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信