Neuroethics and AI ethics: a proposal for collaboration.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Arleen Salles, Michele Farisco
{"title":"Neuroethics and AI ethics: a proposal for collaboration.","authors":"Arleen Salles, Michele Farisco","doi":"10.1186/s12868-024-00888-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scientific relationship between neuroscience and artificial intelligence is generally acknowledged, and the role that their long history of collaboration has played in advancing both fields is often emphasized. Beyond the important scientific insights provided by their collaborative development, both neuroscience and AI raise a number of ethical issues that are generally explored by neuroethics and AI ethics. Neuroethics and AI ethics have been gaining prominence in the last few decades, and they are typically carried out by different research communities. However, considering the evolving landscape of AI-assisted neurotechnologies and the various conceptual and practical intersections between AI and neuroscience-such as the increasing application of AI in neuroscientific research, the healthcare of neurological and mental diseases, and the use of neuroscientific knowledge as inspiration for AI-some scholars are now calling for a collaborative relationship between these two domains. This article seeks to explore how a collaborative relationship between neuroethics and AI ethics can stimulate theoretical and, ideally, governance efforts. First, we offer some reasons for calling for the collaboration of the ethical reflection on neuroscientific innovations and AI. Next, we explore some dimensions that we think could be enhanced by the cross-fertilization between these two subfields of ethics. We believe that considering the pace and increasing fusion of neuroscience and AI in the development of innovations, broad and underspecified calls for responsibility that do not consider insights from different ethics subfields will only be partially successful in promoting meaningful changes in both research and applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9031,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neuroscience","volume":"25 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-024-00888-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scientific relationship between neuroscience and artificial intelligence is generally acknowledged, and the role that their long history of collaboration has played in advancing both fields is often emphasized. Beyond the important scientific insights provided by their collaborative development, both neuroscience and AI raise a number of ethical issues that are generally explored by neuroethics and AI ethics. Neuroethics and AI ethics have been gaining prominence in the last few decades, and they are typically carried out by different research communities. However, considering the evolving landscape of AI-assisted neurotechnologies and the various conceptual and practical intersections between AI and neuroscience-such as the increasing application of AI in neuroscientific research, the healthcare of neurological and mental diseases, and the use of neuroscientific knowledge as inspiration for AI-some scholars are now calling for a collaborative relationship between these two domains. This article seeks to explore how a collaborative relationship between neuroethics and AI ethics can stimulate theoretical and, ideally, governance efforts. First, we offer some reasons for calling for the collaboration of the ethical reflection on neuroscientific innovations and AI. Next, we explore some dimensions that we think could be enhanced by the cross-fertilization between these two subfields of ethics. We believe that considering the pace and increasing fusion of neuroscience and AI in the development of innovations, broad and underspecified calls for responsibility that do not consider insights from different ethics subfields will only be partially successful in promoting meaningful changes in both research and applications.

神经伦理学与人工智能伦理学:合作建议。
神经科学与人工智能之间的科学关系已得到普遍认可,它们之间的长期合作在推动这两个领域发展方面所发挥的作用也经常得到强调。除了合作发展提供的重要科学见解之外,神经科学和人工智能还提出了一些伦理问题,神经伦理学和人工智能伦理学一般都会对这些问题进行探讨。神经伦理学和人工智能伦理学在过去几十年中日益受到重视,它们通常由不同的研究团体开展。然而,考虑到人工智能辅助神经技术的不断发展,以及人工智能与神经科学在概念和实践上的各种交叉--如人工智能在神经科学研究中的应用日益增多、神经和精神疾病的医疗保健,以及将神经科学知识作为人工智能的灵感来源--一些学者现在呼吁在这两个领域之间建立合作关系。本文试图探讨神经伦理学与人工智能伦理学之间的合作关系如何能够促进理论研究,并在理想情况下促进治理工作。首先,我们提出了呼吁神经科学创新与人工智能伦理反思合作的一些理由。接下来,我们探讨了我们认为这两个伦理学子领域之间的交叉融合可以加强的一些方面。我们认为,考虑到神经科学和人工智能在创新发展中的步伐和日益融合,不考虑不同伦理学子领域见解的宽泛而不明确的责任呼吁,只能部分成功地促进研究和应用领域的有意义变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Neuroscience
BMC Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
16 months
期刊介绍: BMC Neuroscience is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of neuroscience, welcoming studies that provide insight into the molecular, cellular, developmental, genetic and genomic, systems, network, cognitive and behavioral aspects of nervous system function in both health and disease. Both experimental and theoretical studies are within scope, as are studies that describe methodological approaches to monitoring or manipulating nervous system function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信