Interfacing legitimacy - health and social care integration in Scotland.

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Anthropology & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1080/13648470.2024.2372164
Tamara Mulherin
{"title":"Interfacing legitimacy - health and social care integration in Scotland.","authors":"Tamara Mulherin","doi":"10.1080/13648470.2024.2372164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As people, particularly those ageing and living with disabilities, struggle with how care is enacted, integrated care has gained policy purchase in the United Kingdom. Despite integration's apparent popularity, its contribution to improved care for people has been questioned, exposing uncertainties about its associated benefits. Nonetheless, over decades a remarkably consistent approach to integrated care has advanced partnerships between the NHS and local government. Accordingly, in 2014 the Scottish Government mandated Health and Social Care Integration (HSCI) <i>via</i> the Scottish Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act. Emerging from an interorganisational ethnography of the implementation of a Health and Social Care Partnership in 2016, in a place I call 'Kintra', I interrogated what happened when NHS Kintra and Kintra Council endeavoured to implement HSCI according to the precepts of 'the Act'. Immersed in the everyday arrangements in the spaces of governance, I attended to how these policy actors worked to both (re)configure and held things together behind care frontiers, and away from the bodywork of direct care. I charted their efforts to comply with regulations, plan, and build governance apparatuses through documents. In following documents, I show the ways in which HSCI was materialised through documentation. I reveal how, in the mundane mattering of document manufacturing, possibilities for (re)forming the carescape emerged. I deploy a posthuman practice stance to show not only the way in which 'papery' partnerships between the NHS and local government 'enact' care, but also how they make worlds through a sociomaterial politics of anticipation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8240,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"69-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2024.2372164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As people, particularly those ageing and living with disabilities, struggle with how care is enacted, integrated care has gained policy purchase in the United Kingdom. Despite integration's apparent popularity, its contribution to improved care for people has been questioned, exposing uncertainties about its associated benefits. Nonetheless, over decades a remarkably consistent approach to integrated care has advanced partnerships between the NHS and local government. Accordingly, in 2014 the Scottish Government mandated Health and Social Care Integration (HSCI) via the Scottish Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act. Emerging from an interorganisational ethnography of the implementation of a Health and Social Care Partnership in 2016, in a place I call 'Kintra', I interrogated what happened when NHS Kintra and Kintra Council endeavoured to implement HSCI according to the precepts of 'the Act'. Immersed in the everyday arrangements in the spaces of governance, I attended to how these policy actors worked to both (re)configure and held things together behind care frontiers, and away from the bodywork of direct care. I charted their efforts to comply with regulations, plan, and build governance apparatuses through documents. In following documents, I show the ways in which HSCI was materialised through documentation. I reveal how, in the mundane mattering of document manufacturing, possibilities for (re)forming the carescape emerged. I deploy a posthuman practice stance to show not only the way in which 'papery' partnerships between the NHS and local government 'enact' care, but also how they make worlds through a sociomaterial politics of anticipation.

合法性的交融--苏格兰的医疗和社会护理一体化。
由于人们,尤其是老龄化人群和残疾人士,对如何提供护理感到纠结,综合护理在英国获得了政策支持。尽管整合护理显然很受欢迎,但它对改善人们护理的贡献却受到质疑,暴露了其相关益处的不确定性。尽管如此,几十年来,一种非常一致的整合护理方法推动了国家医疗服务体系与地方政府之间的合作。因此,2014 年,苏格兰政府通过《苏格兰公共机构(联合工作)(苏格兰)法案》授权实施医疗与社会护理一体化(HSCI)。2016 年,在一个我称之为 "金特拉 "的地方,我对医疗与社会护理合作伙伴关系的实施情况进行了组织间人种学调查,调查了金特拉国民医疗服务体系(NHS)和金特拉理事会根据 "法案 "的规定努力实施医疗与社会护理一体化时发生了什么。我沉浸在治理空间的日常安排中,关注这些政策参与者是如何在医疗保健的前沿阵地,以及远离直接医疗保健的身体工作的地方,努力(重新)配置和维系一切的。我通过文件记录了他们在遵守法规、制定计划和建立治理机构方面所做的努力。在接下来的文件中,我展示了通过文件具体化 HSCI 的方式。我揭示了在文件制作的平凡事务中,如何出现了(重新)形成护理景观的可能性。我采用后人类实践的立场,不仅展示了国家医疗服务体系与地方政府之间的 "纸质 "合作如何 "创造 "医疗服务,还展示了它们如何通过社会物质政治的预期来创造世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信