Efficacy of topical local anesthetic, topical cooling spray, and audiovisual distraction on relief of needle-related pain during blood collection: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Siwatus Puangrab, Weeratian Tawanwongsri, Auemphon Mordmuang, Wiphada Khocharoen, Pimchanok Krainukun
{"title":"Efficacy of topical local anesthetic, topical cooling spray, and audiovisual distraction on relief of needle-related pain during blood collection: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Siwatus Puangrab, Weeratian Tawanwongsri, Auemphon Mordmuang, Wiphada Khocharoen, Pimchanok Krainukun","doi":"10.17219/acem/188106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venipuncture is one of the most common invasive procedures in healthcare, often resulting in the experience of pain. While audiovisual distraction, topical anesthesia and cold spray application have been reported as methods to reduce pain, there is a lack of studies that focus on comparing their efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pain reduction during venipuncture using audiovisual distraction, topical anesthesia and cold spray application.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A randomized controlled study was conducted at Walailak University (Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand) from April 2023 to July 2023. Eligible adult participants voluntarily enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: group 1 (control), group 2 (topical anesthetic), group 3 (cooling spray), and group 4 (audiovisual distraction). Pain scores and satisfaction levels were assessed following the venipuncture procedure on the upper extremities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven participants were included in the final analysis. The participants had a mean age of 42.3 years (standard deviation (±SD): 13.1), with the majority being female (66.0%). The participants in the intervention groups reported lower pain scores than those in group 1. The mean differences were 2.67 points in group 2 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.49-3.84; p < 0.001), 1.56 points in group 3 (95% CI: 0.15-2.98; p = 0.077), and 1.67 points in group 4 (95% CI: 0.37-2.96; p = 0.042). However, the pain reduction did not reach statistical significance when comparing these 3 interventions. All groups reported a median satisfaction level of 3, with no significant difference among them (H(3) = 6.050, p = 0.109).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pain reduction interventions, including topical anesthetic, cooling spray and audiovisual distraction, are effective methods for alleviating pain during venipuncture. Participants who received a topical anesthetic reported the lowest pain scores and highest levels of satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/188106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Venipuncture is one of the most common invasive procedures in healthcare, often resulting in the experience of pain. While audiovisual distraction, topical anesthesia and cold spray application have been reported as methods to reduce pain, there is a lack of studies that focus on comparing their efficacy and safety.

Objectives: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pain reduction during venipuncture using audiovisual distraction, topical anesthesia and cold spray application.

Material and methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted at Walailak University (Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand) from April 2023 to July 2023. Eligible adult participants voluntarily enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: group 1 (control), group 2 (topical anesthetic), group 3 (cooling spray), and group 4 (audiovisual distraction). Pain scores and satisfaction levels were assessed following the venipuncture procedure on the upper extremities.

Results: Forty-seven participants were included in the final analysis. The participants had a mean age of 42.3 years (standard deviation (±SD): 13.1), with the majority being female (66.0%). The participants in the intervention groups reported lower pain scores than those in group 1. The mean differences were 2.67 points in group 2 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.49-3.84; p < 0.001), 1.56 points in group 3 (95% CI: 0.15-2.98; p = 0.077), and 1.67 points in group 4 (95% CI: 0.37-2.96; p = 0.042). However, the pain reduction did not reach statistical significance when comparing these 3 interventions. All groups reported a median satisfaction level of 3, with no significant difference among them (H(3) = 6.050, p = 0.109).

Conclusions: Pain reduction interventions, including topical anesthetic, cooling spray and audiovisual distraction, are effective methods for alleviating pain during venipuncture. Participants who received a topical anesthetic reported the lowest pain scores and highest levels of satisfaction.

局部局麻药、局部降温喷雾和视听分散对缓解采血过程中与针头相关疼痛的效果:随机对照试验。
背景:静脉穿刺是医疗领域最常见的侵入性操作之一,通常会导致疼痛。虽然有报道称视听分散、局部麻醉和冷喷等方法可减轻疼痛,但缺乏对这些方法的有效性和安全性进行比较的研究:我们的目的是比较在静脉穿刺过程中使用视听分散法、局部麻醉法和冷喷法减轻疼痛的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照研究于 2023 年 4 月至 2023 年 7 月在瓦拉莱克大学(泰国那空四他玛拉省)进行。符合条件的成年参与者自愿报名参加研究,并被随机分配到 4 组中的 1 组:第 1 组(对照组)、第 2 组(局部麻醉剂组)、第 3 组(降温喷雾组)和第 4 组(视听分散组)。在上肢静脉穿刺后,对疼痛评分和满意度进行评估:最终分析包括 47 名参与者。参与者的平均年龄为 42.3 岁(标准差(±SD):13.1),大多数为女性(66.0%)。干预组参与者的疼痛评分低于第一组,第二组的平均差异为 2.67 分(95% 置信区间 (95% CI):1.49-3.84;p < 0.001),第三组为 1.56 分(95% CI:0.15-2.98;p = 0.077),第四组为 1.67 分(95% CI:0.37-2.96;p = 0.042)。然而,在对这三种干预措施进行比较时,疼痛减轻的程度并没有达到统计学意义。所有组的满意度中位数均为 3,无显著差异(H(3) = 6.050,P = 0.109):包括局部麻醉剂、冷却喷雾和视听转移在内的减轻疼痛干预措施是减轻静脉穿刺时疼痛的有效方法。接受局部麻醉的参与者疼痛评分最低,满意度最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信