Efficacy of topical local anesthetic, topical cooling spray, and audiovisual distraction on relief of needle-related pain during blood collection: A randomized controlled trial.
{"title":"Efficacy of topical local anesthetic, topical cooling spray, and audiovisual distraction on relief of needle-related pain during blood collection: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Siwatus Puangrab, Weeratian Tawanwongsri, Auemphon Mordmuang, Wiphada Khocharoen, Pimchanok Krainukun","doi":"10.17219/acem/188106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venipuncture is one of the most common invasive procedures in healthcare, often resulting in the experience of pain. While audiovisual distraction, topical anesthesia and cold spray application have been reported as methods to reduce pain, there is a lack of studies that focus on comparing their efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pain reduction during venipuncture using audiovisual distraction, topical anesthesia and cold spray application.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A randomized controlled study was conducted at Walailak University (Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand) from April 2023 to July 2023. Eligible adult participants voluntarily enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: group 1 (control), group 2 (topical anesthetic), group 3 (cooling spray), and group 4 (audiovisual distraction). Pain scores and satisfaction levels were assessed following the venipuncture procedure on the upper extremities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven participants were included in the final analysis. The participants had a mean age of 42.3 years (standard deviation (±SD): 13.1), with the majority being female (66.0%). The participants in the intervention groups reported lower pain scores than those in group 1. The mean differences were 2.67 points in group 2 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.49-3.84; p < 0.001), 1.56 points in group 3 (95% CI: 0.15-2.98; p = 0.077), and 1.67 points in group 4 (95% CI: 0.37-2.96; p = 0.042). However, the pain reduction did not reach statistical significance when comparing these 3 interventions. All groups reported a median satisfaction level of 3, with no significant difference among them (H(3) = 6.050, p = 0.109).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pain reduction interventions, including topical anesthetic, cooling spray and audiovisual distraction, are effective methods for alleviating pain during venipuncture. Participants who received a topical anesthetic reported the lowest pain scores and highest levels of satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/188106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Venipuncture is one of the most common invasive procedures in healthcare, often resulting in the experience of pain. While audiovisual distraction, topical anesthesia and cold spray application have been reported as methods to reduce pain, there is a lack of studies that focus on comparing their efficacy and safety.
Objectives: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pain reduction during venipuncture using audiovisual distraction, topical anesthesia and cold spray application.
Material and methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted at Walailak University (Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand) from April 2023 to July 2023. Eligible adult participants voluntarily enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: group 1 (control), group 2 (topical anesthetic), group 3 (cooling spray), and group 4 (audiovisual distraction). Pain scores and satisfaction levels were assessed following the venipuncture procedure on the upper extremities.
Results: Forty-seven participants were included in the final analysis. The participants had a mean age of 42.3 years (standard deviation (±SD): 13.1), with the majority being female (66.0%). The participants in the intervention groups reported lower pain scores than those in group 1. The mean differences were 2.67 points in group 2 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.49-3.84; p < 0.001), 1.56 points in group 3 (95% CI: 0.15-2.98; p = 0.077), and 1.67 points in group 4 (95% CI: 0.37-2.96; p = 0.042). However, the pain reduction did not reach statistical significance when comparing these 3 interventions. All groups reported a median satisfaction level of 3, with no significant difference among them (H(3) = 6.050, p = 0.109).
Conclusions: Pain reduction interventions, including topical anesthetic, cooling spray and audiovisual distraction, are effective methods for alleviating pain during venipuncture. Participants who received a topical anesthetic reported the lowest pain scores and highest levels of satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly.
Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff.
Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj.
Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker.
The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition.
In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus.
Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.