Nature-based shoreline protection in newly formed tidal marshes is controlled by tidal inundation and sedimentation rate

IF 3.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 LIMNOLOGY
Marte M. Stoorvogel, Stijn Temmerman, Lotte Oosterlee, Ken Schoutens, Tom Maris, Johan van de Koppel, Patrick Meire, Tjeerd J. Bouma
{"title":"Nature-based shoreline protection in newly formed tidal marshes is controlled by tidal inundation and sedimentation rate","authors":"Marte M. Stoorvogel,&nbsp;Stijn Temmerman,&nbsp;Lotte Oosterlee,&nbsp;Ken Schoutens,&nbsp;Tom Maris,&nbsp;Johan van de Koppel,&nbsp;Patrick Meire,&nbsp;Tjeerd J. Bouma","doi":"10.1002/lno.12676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many tidal marshes have been lost by past land use changes, but are nowadays increasingly restored and created to provide valuable ecosystem services such as nature-based flood and erosion protection along estuarine shorelines. To be functional for flood and shoreline erosion protection, restored and created tidal marshes should develop erosion resistant sediment beds. Here, we investigated which factors drive the spatial variations in sediment strength and erosion resistance in a developing tidal marsh restoration site. Our results show that decreasing tidal inundation frequency, decreasing sedimentation rate, and better drainage led to stronger consolidation in deeper sediment layers. This consolidation resulted in greater sediment strength, quantified here by shear strength and penetration resistance. Generally, sediment strength was greater when sediment had higher bulk density, while a higher water and fine fraction (= clay and silt) content decreased sediment strength. Overall, all measurement locations were relatively erosion resistant, likely caused by the dense root network and cohesive sediment. To restore or create resilient tidal marshes for nature-based flood and shoreline erosion protection, we should thus aim for sites with relatively low tidal inundation frequency, moderate sedimentation rates, and cohesive sediment mixtures of clay, silt, and sand, which are well drained and have potential for vegetation establishment. These conditions have a high likelihood of resulting in restored or created tidal marshes that contribute to nature-based flood and shoreline erosion protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":18143,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography","volume":"69 10","pages":"2377-2390"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lno.12676","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lno.12676","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many tidal marshes have been lost by past land use changes, but are nowadays increasingly restored and created to provide valuable ecosystem services such as nature-based flood and erosion protection along estuarine shorelines. To be functional for flood and shoreline erosion protection, restored and created tidal marshes should develop erosion resistant sediment beds. Here, we investigated which factors drive the spatial variations in sediment strength and erosion resistance in a developing tidal marsh restoration site. Our results show that decreasing tidal inundation frequency, decreasing sedimentation rate, and better drainage led to stronger consolidation in deeper sediment layers. This consolidation resulted in greater sediment strength, quantified here by shear strength and penetration resistance. Generally, sediment strength was greater when sediment had higher bulk density, while a higher water and fine fraction (= clay and silt) content decreased sediment strength. Overall, all measurement locations were relatively erosion resistant, likely caused by the dense root network and cohesive sediment. To restore or create resilient tidal marshes for nature-based flood and shoreline erosion protection, we should thus aim for sites with relatively low tidal inundation frequency, moderate sedimentation rates, and cohesive sediment mixtures of clay, silt, and sand, which are well drained and have potential for vegetation establishment. These conditions have a high likelihood of resulting in restored or created tidal marshes that contribute to nature-based flood and shoreline erosion protection.

Abstract Image

在新形成的潮汐沼泽中,基于自然的海岸线保护受潮汐淹没和沉积速率的控制
许多潮汐沼泽已因过去的土地使用变化而消失,但如今,越来越多的潮汐沼泽得到恢复和营造,以提供宝贵的生态系统服务,如在河口海岸线提供基于自然的防洪和防侵蚀保护。为了发挥防洪和保护海岸线侵蚀的功能,恢复和创建的潮沼应形成抗侵蚀的沉积床。在此,我们研究了哪些因素会导致一个正在开发的潮汐沼泽恢复地点的沉积物强度和抗侵蚀性发生空间变化。我们的研究结果表明,潮汐淹没频率的降低、沉积速率的减小以及排水系统的改善会导致更深沉积层的更强固结。这种固结导致了沉积物强度的提高,在这里用剪切强度和抗穿透性来量化。一般来说,沉积物体积密度越高,沉积物强度越大,而含水量和细颗粒(=粘土和粉土)含量越高,沉积物强度越小。总体而言,所有测量点都具有较强的抗侵蚀能力,这可能是由密集的根系网络和粘性沉积物造成的。因此,为了恢复或创建具有弹性的潮汐沼泽地,以自然为基础保护洪水和海岸线侵蚀,我们应该选择潮汐淹没频率相对较低、沉积速率适中、粘土、粉土和沙子混合的粘性沉积物、排水良好且具有植被建立潜力的地点。在这些条件下,很有可能恢复或形成潮汐沼泽,为自然洪水和海岸线侵蚀提供保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Limnology and Oceanography
Limnology and Oceanography 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography (L&O; print ISSN 0024-3590, online ISSN 1939-5590) publishes original articles, including scholarly reviews, about all aspects of limnology and oceanography. The journal''s unifying theme is the understanding of aquatic systems. Submissions are judged on the originality of their data, interpretations, and ideas, and on the degree to which they can be generalized beyond the particular aquatic system examined. Laboratory and modeling studies must demonstrate relevance to field environments; typically this means that they are bolstered by substantial "real-world" data. Few purely theoretical or purely empirical papers are accepted for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信